Cause of Progress failure unlikely to be found


Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

Not good: Sources in the Russian press say that it will likely be impossible to pinpoint precisely the cause of the Progress failure this week because of a lack of telemetry or data.

The causes of Thursday’s loss of the Progress cargo spacecraft are unlikely to be established, because neither telemetry data nor debris of the Soyuz-U rocket that was taking the cargo vehicle in orbit are available. “Telemetry transmission from the rocket was disrupted instantly, so it is practically impossible to establish the sequence of events to identify the causes of the emergency. As for material evidence, such as debris of the rocket’s third stage that might provide some clues, it is not available, either,” the source said.

They are still searching for debris but have so far come up empty.

Lacking data, they are now beginning to use computer modeling to try to figure out what happened. The prime suspect is the third stage engine.

Share

One comment

  • Stevem

    As I understand it, this is the same launch vehicle as used for manned Soyuz launches. This is not very good situation to be in for manned access to the ISS. Maybe NASA ought to be looking at ways of speeding up, if possible, development of Boeing and Spacex capsules. With what appear to be quality control issues with Russian launchers can we trust their reliability for manned launches? If they can’t explain with some certainty what happened with the third stage can we trust putting our astronauts on it?

    Hindsight is 20-20 but wonder why more importance wasn’t given to having two manned launch alternatives before retiring the space shuttle. It only seems prudent to have a backup in case the something goes wrong with Soyuz. Maybe the high reliability of Soyuz reduced apparent need for a backup. Most arguments for alternatives center around having Americans riding an American rocket and eliminating the gouging fees the Russians are charging for a ride.

    I’m thinking that we ought to get Spacex and Boeing delivery speeded up as much as practical.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *