Details revealed about Trump’s space policy?


Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

Detailed comments by former congressman Robert Walker, who is advising the Trump transition team on space policy, yesterday provided some further hints at what the space policy will be during a Trump administration.

Walker said that there is an intent that the National Space Council be re-instituted so as to guide all space activities. civilian, military, and commercial. Walker went on to say that the Trump team is looking for a space policy that is “disruptive, resilient, and enduring”.

For one thing, Walker said that they are looking for a much longer life for the ISS – and that it will need to be refurbished and upgraded. He speculated that it would need to be handed over to an organization or consortium eventually. They are also looking for opportunities to have the commercial sector backfill for NASA so that NASA can focus on deep space exploration. Walker was very clear on this point noting that there was an awareness of many government programs that “take a decade to do with technology that ends up being out of date”.

…Walker was asked several times about SLS/Orion – in the context of Trump’s recent comments about Boeing and Air Force One. Walker did not answer the questions specifically but went into a broader generalization that Trump is not a politician but rather that he is a deal maker. He also thought that Trump’s funding of an ice rink in New York a few years back was a good example of what kind of president he’d be. Walker went on to say that Vice President-elect Pence would be the de-facto “prime minister” and run the government while Donald Trump went out to cut deals.

The issue of Earth science eventually came up. Walker said that the Trump administration is not looking to cancel NASA climate science but rather that they wanted to transfer all of it to other agencies who might have greater expertise. Earth centric research would be transferred so as to allow NASA to focus on space exploration.

It remains unclear whether SLS/Orion will survive a Trump administration. I suspect that at this point they themselves don’t know. They intend to shift climate research from NASA to NOAA, cutting some of that funding as they do so while also changing the personnel that run the research (thus cleaning house). They also probably want to shift NASA’s publicly-stated deep space goals back to the Moon, but this will simply be the empty rhetoric of politicians. More important is the suggestion that they want to extend the life of ISS. Such an action will also require an extension of the commercial crew/cargo contracts, which will also help continue to fuel the new space industry.

Share

5 comments

  • LocalFluff

    The best thing that could happen would be that nuclear space is allowed. Everyone knows that it would make everything so much easier in space, but everyone is well trained to not even thinking about it, because the environmentalists and pacifists are against it. Another thought crime that Trump might want to declare amnesty for.

    There’s an enormous potential to be unleashed. The Trump administration needs to do nothing else than allowing nuclear space, and spaceflight would make its greatest progress since the 1960s. His energy growth idea and his including of nuclear power (plants on Earth) in it sounds promising. Didn’t Ronald Reagan revitalize the nuclear propulsion engines development for the SDI? The nuclear space lobby should be ready to sell this idea at every WH power shift.

  • Kirk

    “Walker said that they are looking for a much longer life for the ISS – and that it will need to be refurbished and upgraded.”

    Might we get something to replace the cancelled Centrifuge Accommodations Module?

  • Edward

    Walker was asked several times about SLS/Orion – in the context of Trump’s recent comments about Boeing and Air Force One. Walker did not answer the questions specifically but went into a broader generalization that Trump is not a politician but rather that he is a deal maker.

    Well, that is an answer suggesting that Trump is willing to use SLS/Orion to make a deal with Congress. As in, “OK, you can keep your SLS program if I can get rid of this other, more expensive, problem.”

    Please let it be the EPA, Department of Education, and the IRS. I could put up with SLS if we could get rid of these hideous organizations. Or am I hoping too big?

  • Steve Earle

    Edward said:
    “….I could put up with SLS if we could get rid of these hideous organizations. Or am I hoping too big?…”

    I am right there with you. If we have to keep a huge government sinkhole that we pour money into, at least let it be a huge space-related government sinkhole.

    Who knows, the money spent on SLS may at least have some positive outcomes, whereas the money for those other agencies is a textbook example of negative returns on tax-dollars. In all of those cases we are spending money to hurt our own people and economy!

  • ken anthony

    Trump has a balancing act to do when he finally gets into office. He has to go after the biggest budget items that don’t also tie him down. For momentum he has to continually win on smaller items. Either way he should be able to highlight what a disaster the last 8 years have been beyond the gas lighting medias ability to lie to us.

    Hopefully a lot of institutions will learn the lesson of Jericho’s walls in the next decade.

    The spin already is that Obama set up Trump for success!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *