Leftist thugs harass conservative black woman and white man eating lunch


Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right or below. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

They’re coming for you next: Two of the leaders of the conservative Turning Point USA, Candace Owen and Charlie Kirk, were harassed today in Philadelphia by leftist antifa protesters, with one throwing a liquid on Kirk.

Police were required to prevent the protesters from getting violent.

It must be noted the Owens is black and Kirk is white. It appears that the leftists have a problem with them eating together. In fact, somehow this black activist is in favor of “white supremacy” according to these protesters.

This has only just begun. Should the Democrats make gains in the November elections, expect them to throw a great deal of financial support to these thugs, empowering them to do more violence against anyone who dissents from the leftist Democratic power structure.

Share

8 comments

  • Col Beausabre

    My take away on this is that it was not a random event. The couple was clearly tracked and a mob was on call once they were stationary – the attackers even designated someone to film what was going on. Question, what the bluidy hell was the restaurant management doing? If someone was harassing guests at my restaurant, the mob would be told to leave and if they didn’t, the police would be called in….was the restaurant in on it and they were the ones who called in the mob? Something is very fishy here

  • Michael

    As much as I hate to say it, you know exactly what management was doing.

    I think the technical term is ‘hiding’.

  • wodun

    My take away on this is that it was not a random event. The couple was clearly tracked and a mob was on call once they were stationary

    The militant left has a sort of policy in place where targets are identified that people are supposed to keep an eye out for. It is a popular tactic used at protest events but also something they use for direct actions like exhibited here.

    So, spotting Candace Owens could have been a random event but the response wasn’t. The tactic, targets, communication channels, and organizers are all in place and ready to go.

    Spot the target, send out the alert, mobilize the mob, and engage in direct action. It’s a canned response.

  • Ken Sears

    Antifa is fascist scum. Today’s Brownshirt totalitarians. Rich, pampered, full-of-themselves, congenital malcontents and mostly rich, white civil-rights-demigod-wannabes (Look at me, I’m Gandhi!) who would cower in terror at the genuine dangers faced by historical figures like Martin Luther King. Instead, they puerilely preen themselves on rabidly harassing and assaulting a perfectly innocent couple who have no power in society beyond the power of speech—a power Antifa venomously opposes for all but themselves. They are evil. Sick and evil. They will never forgive the universe for having dared to exist without consulting them first on the blueprints. Hence their ineradicable animus to all things not created in their image.

  • Edward

    In related news: apparently, some thugs do not like to be identified, especially those who wear masks to their disruptive protests:
    https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/08/06/berkeley-police-criticized-for-posting-identities-of-antifa-protesters-this-is-very-disturbing?utm_source=site_scout

    After about 20 people were arrested at a “No to Marxism in Berkeley” rally, most of them Antifa counterprotesters, the department publicized their names, photographs and cities of residence on social media.

    Strangely, these arrested protesters should have known that they would be published, because this is not a Marxist nation, where people are arrested in secret. As part of being an open society, with an eye on police activity, for a long, long time newspapers have had sections called the “Police Blotter.”

  • Cotour

    Wearing a face covering especially to a political demonstration indicates that those participating are attempting to hide their identities for potentially nefarious reasons. If you show up to an event like that it might be reasonable to be confronted and be asked to remove you disguise and or be arrested?

  • wodun

    Rich, pampered, full-of-themselves, congenital malcontents and mostly rich, white civil-rights-demigod-wannabes

    I am sure some are but when you see the arrest photos, many look like meth heads.

    Wearing a face covering especially to a political demonstration indicates that those participating are attempting to hide their identities for potentially nefarious reasons.

    For Antifa, yes. But for other people, many want to avoid Antifa taking the fight off the streets and to your place of employment and to your family.

    The current crop of lefties like to go after people’s families and employers.

  • Col Beausabre

    ‘Wearing a face covering especially to a political demonstration indicates that those participating are attempting to hide their identities for potentially nefarious reasons. If you show up to an event like that it might be reasonable to be confronted and be asked to remove you disguise and or be arrested?’

    New York State has a law on the books about wearing disguises dating back to the Rent Wars of the early Nineteenth
    Century and has used recently against people just like you describe – and such use has stood up in court

    https://thinkprogress.org/new-york-city-police-use-150-year-old-law-against-wearing-masks-to-arrest-wall-street-demonstrators-641e42aafd67/

    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/26/us/protests-masks-laws.html

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *