Russia announces plans to build reusable rocket


Please consider donating to Behind the Black, by giving either a one-time contribution or a regular subscription, as outlined in the tip jar to the right. Your support will allow me to continue covering science and culture as I have for the past twenty years, independent and free from any outside influence.

I’ll believe it when I see it: Russia announced this week new plans to build a reusable smallsat rocket where the first stage would fly back and land vertically.

According to preliminary estimates, the reusable system will cut the cost of payload delivery by 1.5 or 2 times compared to traditional rockets. Every self-guided booster will be designed to fly 50 missions without replacement of its main engines burning a mix of cryogenic liquid oxygen and liquid methane. The system was expected to be based on mobile launchers and its maiden flight was scheduled for 2022, the FPI press release said.

If this project actually does happen, it will be because there has been a political shift within Russia’s government-run space industry. I suspect this because last week they cancelled plans to build a lightweight but expendable smaller version of Proton. Now they are aiming to build a reusable rocket instead. It appears that they have realized they need to cut their costs to compete, and the expendable Proton wasn’t doing it, while a reusable rocket might.

If this is true, then this is good news for Russia’s space future. At the same time, the slowness at which they have made this shift illustrates the disadvantage of their centralized government-run system. Instead of competition within Russia pushing many different independent companies to move forward quickly, all decisions must be made through political maneuvering within Roscosmos, a process that is always slower and more cumbersome.

Share

One comment

  • Tom Billings

    ” Instead of competition within Russia pushing many different independent companies to move forward quickly, all decisions must be made through political maneuvering within Roscosmos, a process that is always slower and more cumbersome.”

    “When a society moves from allocating resources by custom and tradition (modern read here, by politics) to allocating resources by markets, they may be said to have undergone an industrial revolution” Arnold Toynbee-1884

    Thus, Russia still struggles with her reversion to pre-industrial resource allocation, 100 years after they first turned away from the 30 years of industrial growth they had barely begun under the Tsars. While technology matters, it matters only at the tactical level most often, and seldom at the strategic level, and almost never at the policy level. It is in policy where the choice between industrial prosperity and pre-industrial poverty is first and foremost a choice between industrial society’s freedoms of action to grow and sustain the highly productive networks of industrial society around the world, and agrarian society’s elaborate hierarchies, distributing resources to keep the hierarchy in place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *