Scroll down to read this post.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


Sierra Nevada has successfully completed wind tunnel tests a several scale models of their winged spacecraft Dream Chaser.

The competition heats up: Sierra Nevada has successfully completed wind tunnel tests a several scale models of their winged spacecraft Dream Chaser.

It appears from these tests that the spacecraft’s design works better than expected during ascent and re-entry.

The article also gives a quick overview of the status of all three commercial companies, and from this it really looks to me as if Boeing is the least aggressive in pursuing its construction effort. This is merely an impression, and not to be taken too seriously, but it really does look like Boeing is playing the public relations game, doing as little work as possible while trying to garner the most publicity while waiting for the award of the contract.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

3 comments

  • Kelly Starks

    The opinion around here is that they have done a conservative NASA friendly design, in as NASA friendly (cut no corners) highests quality manor. And they are the most expensive which is a big plus for voter/congressional support.

    Dream Chasers a lot cheaper, and still built by reputable teams and high quality, but not as high so it costs significantly less. But the softer landing, more operationally flexible then the other two is a plus.

    SpaceX is the wild child spending ridiculously little, no experienced folk in the teams, no standard aerospace practices etc, and still kinda pricy; but huge political connections.

    Its a guess for everyone which way it will go.

  • Dick Eagleson

    The only voters who support the most expensive option are the ones employed in producing it. The rest of us wish you’d all go get real jobs.

    Also to be noted, the false conflation of cost and quality.

    I think you’ll find SpaceX has quite a few “experienced folk in the teams” including a few NASA veterans so ancient they actually worked there when the agency knew how to design and build stuff. That would exclude most anyone who has come aboard NASA in the last, say, three decades. Not surprising to me at all if SpaceX round-filed their resumes.

    Note: “no standard aerospace practices” = no bribing Congressmen to get cost-plus contracts with no hard performance requirements.

    :Huge political connections?” Surely you jest. I once called the local office of the Congresswoman who represents the district in which SpaceX’s Hawthorne, CA plant is located. The person who took my call seemed never to have heard of SpaceX despite it being one of the largest employers in the district.

  • Kelly Starks

    >..The only voters who support the most expensive option are the ones employed in producing it. ..

    Very very untrue. The vast bulk of public support for NASA has long been shown to be due to it spending money in the voters districts. Something like 90% of the folks who’d actually write to a congressman etc, are for the pork. No surprise why gov programs maximize pork. Its just worse for NASA, since unlike the mil or the huge welfare programs, their actual products gen very little interest.

    > … The rest of us wish you’d all go get real jobs…

    Don’t look at me dude, at the moment I’m doing Dream Chaser.
    ;)

    > Also to be noted, the false conflation of cost and quality.

    Yeah, lets just say when you say you can do things for 100 times cheaper then NASA and dozens of times cheaper then any commercials, people can pretty well expect their going to get a Trabant not a Caddy.

    >
    > I think you’ll find SpaceX has quite a few “experienced folk in the teams” including a few NASA veterans
    > so ancient they actually worked there when the agency knew how to design and build stuff.===

    Actually NASA never designed and built stuff, they ordered it from companies who did. Back in Von Brauns day they did excel at systems engineering, requirements analysis, traceability — all the plus side of paperwork [the major now “standard aerospace practices” that are why the – which are things engineering folks I know who toured SpaceX noted was seriously missing.

    Actually the low % of senior folks and expertice was long noted as a issue with SpaceX, as well as a high turn over rate of the prime folks. But as to teams.. compare that with SNC Dream Chaser Team

    Boeing Phantom Works – construction of some early[which?] test articles[12][dated info]
    Charles Stark Draper Laboratory – Guidance, Navigation and Control[12]
    Aerojet – reaction control system technology[12]
    University of Colorado – human-rating[12]
    AdamWorks – composites[12]
    MDA – systems engineering[12]
    Lockheed Martin – airframe construction and human rating of the spaceplane[44][45]

    And of course smaller groups like the Orbitek team I’m working on doing ECLSS, TCS, and possibly soon propulsion systems.

    >…Huge political connections?” Surely you jest. ..

    If you’ld noted here and other places. Musk has been very good about pouring money into the best hands.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply to Dick Eagleson

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *