Scroll down to read this post.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. I keep the website clean from pop-ups and annoying demands. Instead, I depend entirely on my readers to support me. Though this means I am sacrificing some income, it also means that I remain entirely independent from outside pressure. By depending solely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, no one can threaten me with censorship. You don't like what I write, you can simply go elsewhere.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.


Sierra Nevada protests NASA manned spacecraft contact award

The competition heats up: Sierra Nevada has formally protested NASA’s decision to award Boeing and SpaceX manned spacecraft contracts.

The company said late Friday that its bid in the NASA Commercial Crew Transportation Capability (CCTCap) was $900 million less than the bid submitted by Boeing, which won a contract worth as much as $4.2 billion to complete development, test fly and operate its CST-100 crew capsule. At the same time, SNC said, its proposal was “near equivalent [in] technical and past performance” source-selection scoring.

“[T]he official NASA solicitation for the CCtCap contract prioritized price as the primary evaluation criteria for the proposals, setting it equal to the combined value of the other two primary evaluation criteria: mission suitability and past performance,” the company stated. “SNC’s Dream Chaser proposal was the second lowest priced proposal in the CCtCap competition.”

In other words, they are challenging NASA’s decision to pick Boeing over them, as their proposal was far cheaper.

We all know that Boeing got the contract as much for its political clout as for its technical expertise. NASA wanted to make sure that members of Congress who promote the Boeing jobs in their districts would have nothing to complain about. Whether Sierra Nevada can get the government to look past that political clout is very doubtful, though I think I support them whole-heartedly in their effort.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 
The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

6 comments

  • Doug

    Then again they could just take all the money being spent on SLS and split it between SpaceX and Dream Chaser and actually have a working heavy lift vehicle by 2017.

  • Kelly Starks

    Reports I read were that they hadn’t stated which of the 2 competitors they were protesting? Protesting they had similar technical quality to Boeing seems laughable given what we’ve seen on the two programs here, or what they said? I.E. they expected Boeing would be the high cost, high quality option, but they could compete with acceptable quality at lower cost. So this confuses me.

    Also if both Boeing and SNCs CCDev projects are on hold due to legal conflicts this could hold up the program to the point the political interest in doing CCDev at all goes away. (at the least further layoffs on both Boeing and SNC teams [like the Boeing and Dream Chaser support contracts here at Orbitech] could shut down.)

  • Matt in AZ

    While I’m not a big fan of the current trend of filing protests in the wake of losing out in large government contracts, there is some irony here in that it was Boeing who kicked off that trend. In 2008, it lost out to EADS (Airbus) on a major USAF tanker fleet competition, and then used all its legal and political might to successfully have that decision overturned and the contract awarded to them. All this, despite having been involved in a major corruption scandal that sent the preceding tanker deal down in flames.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KC-X

  • geoffc

    To be fair, Dream Chaser is a space vehicle, not a booster (Relies on Atlas V, you may be thinking Blue Origin who want to build and orbital vehicle and a booster). However give SpaceX the money and they ought to be able to deliver a real heavy lift booster. Heck Falcon Heavy would suffice for most of the missions, and BFR for the rest. (Work on their 1+mLb thrust Raptor CH4/LOX is already underway on their own dime…)

  • Pzatchok

    Just cut the inflated Boeing budget by a third and give that cash to Dream Chaser.

    That way we stand a far better chance of actually getting a passenger craft into space.

    There is little hope Boeing would make its deadline anyways.
    It still doesn’t have a service module or rocket built so for all intents and purposes it should be a lot farther along than it is since all its building is a fancy dragon capsule.
    And since they are supposed to have all the capability and expertise they should be able to do it cheaper and faster than some small company doing this for the first time,

  • Kelly Starks

    Boeing wasn’t cutting as many quality corners as we were on SNC and SpaceX does. Which would drive costs up. Though being at least most of a year ahead of the others, I’ld think Boeing could do it cheaper since they were better able to make decisions and coordinate actions, so lower labor hours. Though they hired more experienced folks, which likely charged higher rtaes.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *