Cruz’s pork/budget bill also adds new taxes to rocket launches
Ted Cruz, a typical “tax-and-spend” Republican
It appears the Senate appropriations bill that was put forth last week by senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas), head of the Senate’s commerce committee, was not simply filled with pork, it also establishes a new tax structure for rocket launches, with the money supposedly allocated to pay for the increased red tape required by the FAA.
Cruz’s section of the Senate reconciliation bill calls for the FAA to charge commercial space companies per pound of payload mass, beginning with 25 cents per pound in 2026 and increasing to $1.50 per pound in 2033. Subsequent fee rates would change based on inflation. The overall fee per launch or entry would be capped at $30,000 in 2026, increasing to $200,000 in 2033, and then adjusted to keep pace with inflation.
You can read the bill here [pdf].
In a statement by Cruz during a senate hearing last week, he justified these new taxes as follows:
Cruz said the rising number of space launches will “add considerable strain to the airspace system” in the United States. Airlines and their passengers pay FAA-mandated fees for each flight segment, and private owners pay the FAA a fee to register their aircraft. The FAA also charges overflight fees to aircraft traveling through US airspace, even if they don’t take off or land in the United States.
“Nearly every user of the National Airspace System pays something back into the system to help cover their operational costs, yet under current law, space launch companies do not, and there is no mechanism for them to pay even if they wish to,” Cruz said. “As commercial spaceflight expands rapidly, so does its impact on the FAA’s ability to operate the National Airspace System. This proposal accounts for that.”
All this may be true, but this new tax is just another way for the corrupt DC crowd to squeeze more money from American citizens without any real benefit, and at the same time abdicate Congress’s responsibilities to control spending and the federal bureaucracy.
First, the bill specifically creates a special FAA budget line item in which to dump these taxes, and then gives that 70% of that money forever to the FAA’s commercial space office (AST).
70 percent of the amounts deposited into the fund shall be available for such purposes and shall be available without further appropriation and without fiscal year limitation. [emphasis mine]
What a great system to grow government, divorced entirely from the legislative and elective process!
Second, the bill assumes that AST must grow exponentially to match the growth in launches, an assumption that is false. AST might need more staffing and money in the coming years to meet the increased number of launches, but there is no evidence it needs to grow this much. Once Trump took office and AST was no longer forced to do the scads of unnecessary paperwork forced on it by Biden it has not only had no problem meeting the increased launch rate in 2025, the red tape faced by rocket companies has actually gone down.
Like pigs at the trough
Cruz’s proposed taxes and fees will simply fund the endless growth of a new government bureaucracy that isn’t needed to this extent. Eventually this bloated bureaucracy is going to have to to justify its existence, and to do so I guarantee it will then lobby for more launch regulations. That is what has always happened when Congress has created these kinds of independently-funded bureaucracies, and I guarantee it will happen here again with the FAA.
Thank you Ted Cruz and our Republican-controlled Senate! And Republicans wonder why they have had difficulty getting the voters to support them enthusiastically. Why should we? We vote to have them shrink government, and all they ever do is grow it.
Elon Musk’s call for a new political party during his Trump kerfuffle two weeks ago amid his disgust at the budget proposal in Congress might very well make sense.
Readers!
My annual February birthday fund-raising drive for Behind the Black is now over. Thank you to everyone who donated or subscribed. While not a record-setter, the donations were more than sufficient and slightly above average.
As I have said many times before, I can’t express what it means to me to get such support, especially as no one is required to pay anything to read my work. Thank you all again!
For those readers who like my work here at Behind the Black and haven't contributed so far, please consider donating or subscribing. My analysis of space, politics, and culture, taken from the perspective of an historian, is almost always on the money and ahead of the game. For example, in 2020 I correctly predicted that the COVID panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Every one of those 2020 conclusions has turned out right.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:
4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.
Cruz is that most infuriating of Republicans, that can get in front of a camera and say great things, or write an op-ed, or do an interview, that make you think he’s actually a republican, and wants to get important things done, and is paying attention, etc. Then he goes into the back room and acts like a fully certified member of the uniparty/deep state.
Which is what makes Rubio a wonder at State. I thought he was the same way.
As the Psalm says, “Put not your faith in princes.”
I don’t have any ideological problem with space launch providers paying airspace usage fees of some sort, or even with basing them on payload weight – after all, a widebody airliner in revenue service pays a lot more FAA fees than a weekender recreational pilot with a Piper Cub. But Robert is correct that the way these fees are structured in Cruz’s legislation puts them on an open-ended escalator. One hopes someone with better sense introduces some amendments in committee to fix this but it never pays to be too hopeful anent such things.
It’s also worth noting that this is – to a first, and probably even a second, order basis – a tax that will fall almost entirely on SpaceX. SpaceX currently lofts more than 85% of all mass sent to space in a year’s time worldwide, and probably over 90% of all mass launched from US soil. So Elon and Gwynne definitely need to get their lobbyists busy on amending this proposal to keep its future exactions from ramping up unreasonably.
I think space outfits shouldn’t pay any taxes for a long while–it is a tough field and needs every advantage.
Sports team owners like Mark Cuban can be soaked for all I care.
I don’t grouse when I pay property tax because I drive on roads.
Ted’s background is that of an elite lawyer. (A pretty good one, I might add.)
One wonders how frequently you would see legislation like this advance in Congress if we had more business owners — especially small business owners — elected there, and fewer lawyers?
They shouldn’t be issuing individual permits in launches anymore than we do for individual aircraft flights.