A sane, rational actor would take a step back and consider his own role in losing three branches of government, a majority of statehouses, and two-thirds of the Supreme Court. …

And so, the losing losers of the Democratic Party continue to lose. They can’t even counterpunch effectively, because they overreact to every feint. They’re so ridiculously undisciplined, they’re chasing shadows, following the champ around the ring like a puppy dog — eating a buffet of rights, jabs, and uppercuts.

It isn’t just the Democrat leadership that does this. Their voters do the same thing, thinking that Trump is stupid and that Musk is crazy, despite the evidence of their own eyes. These are emotional reactions, not rational ones.

Meanwhile, the most-vocal members of the liberal alliance are pleading for more theatrics, more fireworks, and more enraged opposition …

This is not a surprise. The Democrats feel as though they have the right solutions to everything, and when those solutions do now work out, then they feel that they need to apply more solution. This is what Obama did with his stimulus package, which was just amore massive increase in Keynesian Economics than had ever been tried before, resulting not in prosperity* but in the Great Recession of the 2010s. So, if they feel that theatrics, fireworks, and enraged opposition are the solutions, that is what they will continue doing, just more of them.

Robert wrote: “We must remember that though Trump won handily in November, he also did not win with that great a majority, only 49.9% to 48.3%. The victories in the battleground states were razor thin as well.”

That was the result after the cheating that the Democrat Party performed in 2024. They didn’t do it as openly as in 2020, but they did do it. Despite California taking 38 days to count votes, it does not take 38 days to count votes. But it could take that long to harvest ballots in order to change the outcome of a free and fair election — and ballot harvesting is legal in California, harvesters have one week after Election Day to turn in their harvested ballots. California was not trying to change the presidential vote, but it was trying to change the local votes and especially the representatives to the U.S. House.

“… a very large percentage of Americans still buy into their sales pitch of slander and lies. The Democrats have every reason to stick with this game plan, because it has worked in the past and almost worked in 2024.”

This is more of that emotional feelings that trump Democrats’ rationality. As Jonathan Gruber said, the Democrat Party relies upon the stupidity of the American voter, and since they don’t rely upon Republican or Conservative voters, they must only rely upon the other voters — whom they think are stupid enough to continue their emotional feelings, specifically the feelings that they must continue voting Democratic.

“Consider the commentary below by a woman who voted for Kamala Harris, but is enthused by Trump’s actions:”

She is still emotional: “I regret voting for Kamala. … has really put something on my heart … I’m glad of the results … ”

But she is now beginning to talk about being thoughtful and rational instead: “I don’t know what I was thinking, going in there and voting for Kamala in the first place … Do your research …”
_______________
* Zero percent interest rates should have brought us the biggest economic boom ever, and quantitative easing should have created an unhealthy boom to the economy, but they didn’t because Keynesian Economics cannot work, as it removes the very money from the economy that it relies upon to stimulate the economy. Keynesian Economics is also called demand-side economics, which is supposed to stimulate an economy by increasing the demand and encouraging companies to expand in order to meet that demand. However, increased demand results in increased prices (which should be encouraging businesses to expand) but the increased taxes to hand out to the populace to spend only removes discretionary spending money from the populace, negating the increase in demand; or government borrowing increases the interest rates, making it too expensive for businesses to expand and meet the increased demand; or the government printing money results in inflation and the inability for anyone to afford the goods and services that were going to save the economy.

Reaganomics (supply-side economics) reduced the government costs to doing business (e.g. taxes and costly regulations), resulting in businesses reducing prices, resulting in more people buying products and increasing demand, which the companies were able to afford to supply by expanding, which employed more people who also increased the demand. This worked so well that it took Bush and Clinton a dozen years to cause a recession.

Supply-side economics was what brought about the Roaring Twenties, a century ago. The Great Depression followed in the U.S., the following decade, because the U.S. government tried to intervene in a small downturn and created a huge economic depression. The rest of the world did not have a 1930s depression worth talking about, because those governments let their economies sort themselves out.

Oh, the humanity!

“The man running this badly needed governmental high colonic has released his computer genius minions on the system and they are all young and very driven. And the Democrat party machine is in high “Crush, Kill, Destroy” mode and are intently involved in muddying up these young D.O.G.E. computer genius minions. And we all know and understand that the truth of the matter lies buried deep within these computer systems. Computers don’t forget.”

“The desperate Democrats have now made this young man world famous and have set him on a “BIG BALLS” high trajectory of success!”

https://www.sigma3ioc.com/post/big-balls-flying-high

I agree we (independent freedom loving people) must stay on the offensive. At the current rate and implied depth of the work DOGE and the other (much younger by the way) members of the Trump Cabinet are doing there will be many moments where we are aghast at what is found, including nefarious Republicans. i think we will also be aghast at what is going to be changed – including some favorite programs etc.
.
The perception that the public has will be the reality and will shape the elections and the direction in the future.

So far it looks like power, but the house has to do something in order to keep the initiative and not let the lower courts let things be mired at the beachfront.

“An example of extreme politics in America that really began in earnest under the Barak Hussein Obama presidency. During the Obama presidency his Leftist handlers and insiders introduced the concept of “I have a pen” theory of presidential executive order dominance in leadership and forcing political agendas upon the people of America and the world.”

“The radical ideological Democrat zealots in leadership and in control went for the gold and have in fact accomplished the destruction of their political party by their extremism. Well, done!”

https://www.sigma3ioc.com/post/the-trump-authoritarian-take-over-of-america

In the past, it has often been the case that the ELECTION was considered the ultimate victory, rather than the important first step toward governing that it truly is. It had been enough to simply have “our team” win.