Comments on: The corruption of medical science is surges on

By: Blair Ivey

Blair Ivey — Wed, 27 Jul 2022 11:28:19 +0000

Jester Naybor observed: “Putting the “non-profit” on a pedestal is one of the fallacies underlying our social technocracy.”

I do not think there is anything inherently wrong with altruistic motives. And if those motivations require funding; sure. But please keep in mind that your desires require excess effort (beyond requirements) on the part of others. Maybe a little more humility, here.

By: Jester Naybor

Jester Naybor — Wed, 27 Jul 2022 07:15:56 +0000

And his experience also explains the temptation of fraud to a more desperate and less scrupulous researcher–massage the data to get positive results to get published which will lead to getting grants and moving up the career ladder.

But I was told that in our social technocracy, such Men of Science …. as long as they are not on the payroll of an entity that publicly states its intent to make a profit … are immune to the profit motive, and therefore more noble and trustworthy than the known profit-seekers!

Where is Sarah Hoyt’s shocked face when you need it ???

EVERYONE is susceptible to the profit motive … from the researcher described above, to the activist who moves the goalposts and sensationalizes their “cause” to keep the donations flowing in, to the bureaucrat firmly in the grip of Pournelle’s Iron Law of Bureaucracy and is focused upon the care-and-feeding of his specific empire at the expense of the mission of his agency.

Putting the “non-profit” on a pedestal is one of the fallacies underlying our social technocracy.

By: Alton

Alton — Tue, 26 Jul 2022 20:41:47 +0000

Well I thought I remembered from several of Michael Fumento interviews on Coast To Coast AM…….Here is a pdf of his article:

*****
Michael Fumento: Why is HIV So
Prevalent in Africa?

Sep 19, 2013 — Massive airdrops of condoms, won’t stop African AIDS. Ninety-nine percent of AIDS and HIV cases in Africa come…….

http://hedrick.ucsd.edu/BICD136/PDF-links/Fumento-HIVPrevalent.pdf

By: tlnyc

tlnyc — Tue, 26 Jul 2022 18:22:34 +0000

Not surprised that no one tried to replicate the Alzheimer’s study. It doesn’t pay, both literally and metaphorically. Almost two decades ago, an up-and-coming molecular biologist studying Parkinson’s told me that negative results don’t get published and don’t generate grants. That is, demonstrating that a line of research or a hypothesis is wrong, and scientists need to look elsewhere, may seem important and worthwhile to a layperson but is a disaster for the lab researcher. He spent months running some experiments only to confirm that the mechanism he was looking at was not involved in Parkinson’s. And now was faced with the results not being publishable and a stalled career progression before it even really began. And his experience also explains the temptation of fraud to a more desperate and less scrupulous researcher–massage the data to get positive results to get published which will lead to getting grants and moving up the career ladder.

By: RCMoeur

RCMoeur — Tue, 26 Jul 2022 15:47:14 +0000

As a peer reviewer, I’ll note that what I’m reviewing is the submitted manuscript, not the raw data. And in the time frame allotted for the review, a request for the data (which is typically only triggered if there’s something seriously amiss in the methodology or the findings) likely won’t be fulfilled until well after the review deadline (if the data is even shared – which in a truly functional system would trigger automatic rejection if it isn’t, but it doesn’t always work that way). Also, most of the figures and images in a typical review manuscript are of a detail that wouldn’t typically reveal manipulation.

The bigger problems are: 1. “studies” designed in a way as to inevitably lead to the desired conclusion through invalid control groups or comparisons, or declining/refusing to look at important factors, and 2. favoritism in the review committee; e.g. good studies rejected prior to peer review because the conclusions contradict the opinions or “consensus” of the research committee. And if you are impertinent enough to keep pointing this out, eventually you’re not getting manuscripts of that type for review anymore, or you’re “dropped” from the review pool.

By: Jeff Wright

Jeff Wright — Tue, 26 Jul 2022 13:18:36 +0000

I wonder if Fumento ever heard of the AIDS Highway…I think truckers spread that off-shoot…no bubonic-resistant genes? Medical fields generate the most retractions-every person is different. Gays hated Fauci…but meds were more simple then. I wonder about biting flys…

By: GWB

GWB — Tue, 26 Jul 2022 12:42:00 +0000

One also wonders why no one ever tried to independently confirm his results, something that used to be a requirement before any new discovery was considered firm.
Actually, they did. There have been studies come out over the last 2 decades saying they don’t think beta-amyloids were the problem. They then seem to get steam-rolled and the “culprit” is once again the focus of every piece of drug research.

“new modes of transmission.”
Well, they’re new if you mean “human with human sex” instead of “human with monkey sex”. I think that is what is hinted at with “areas where it is traditionally found.”
Also, there’s now “adult with child sex” possibly. So, sorta new modes.

Once again, the lust for money
Actually, I think “power” is more the aim on that one. (But, in the corrupt corporatism we currently have, power leads to money. Which leads to more power.)

“If we can’t get people to act [without] a new Greek name, that’s a problem.”
Here, again, it’s the power that is desired. For most of them it’s the power to act as benevolent dictators, guaranteeing the safety of all humans so they can… [insert path to progressive utopia here]. Some just want the power because (as above) it leads to more money, which leads to more power, which leads to more money….

“Take two aspirins and drink a lot of water.”
Or, “Here’s your HCQ and zinc. Make sure you take the whole course of it.”

Instead, it publishes a screed designed to instill fear
Because they have indoctrinated the people into Safetyism, one of the pillars of Progressivism. “We can – with SCIENCE! – stop all sickness and death!” It’s a way of making themselves gods, since they are the ones providing immortality.

Peter Gent
July 26, 2022 at 3:32 am

For $10-12 a year (cost of 10,000 IU capsules on Amazon) everyone could have been protected.
Not just that, but HCQ and zinc is a cheap treatment. Of course, it has no patent on it, so it makes no real money for anyone. And who wants that when we have a Brand New Disease out there? (Even though coronaviruses regularly infect children and thereby help build their immune systems as they grow.)

By: Peter Gent

Peter Gent — Tue, 26 Jul 2022 10:32:13 +0000

From the beginning they knew D3 would prevent or mitigate COVID. Current research shows as blood levels of D go to 50 ng/ml COVID goes to zero. Being above 60 is a good margin of safety. Fauci accidently let out he has been taking 6,000 IU of D3 from the beginning. For $10-12 a year (cost of 10,000 IU capsules on Amazon) everyone could have been protected. Their response has been criminal and it would be fair to go as far as saying they are accessories to mass murder.

By: t-dub

t-dub — Tue, 26 Jul 2022 04:43:40 +0000

Also: What You Don’t Know Could Hurt You: Novavax’s ‘Loud-and-Clear’ Nanoparticle Adjuvant . . .

This is the “New” vaxx with “Matrix M”

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/novavax-covid-vaccine-nanoparticle-adjuvant/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=c585fc23-f20f-4634-890c-446577b56a5b

By: t-dub

t-dub — Tue, 26 Jul 2022 04:35:07 +0000

From opiates, to SSRI’s, to Alzheimer’s drugs to the mRNA poison, Tucker sums up all of the big pharma graft over the years very well in his monologue tonight.

https://youtu.be/dE7VAuhooUo

By: t-dub

t-dub — Mon, 25 Jul 2022 23:55:49 +0000

Cotour: I appreciate reading your wit and analysis here, thank you.

pzatchok: There will never be an end to the vaxxes and boosters, if not for covid it’ll be for monkey pox or something else, until the people say “Enough!” and put an end to this nonsense. Unfortunately, there are enough “sheeple” that will go along with the “program” that it could very well take a while. It will be interesting to see how many people have to get hurt before something is done.

By: Col Beausabre

Col Beausabre — Mon, 25 Jul 2022 23:55:22 +0000

“Monkeypox is not spreading through “new modes of transmission.” New peer-review research unequivocally confirms it remains a sexually transmitted disease almost exclusively limited to the homosexual community, a fact that has been known for years.” Well, that explains why it’s an international crisis – it predominately affects a sacred minority. Remember Michael Fumento being denounced as a bigoted idiot when he wrote “The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS”……”The belief that AIDS is poised to break out widely among non-drug-abusing heterosexuals is a myth created by the media and public health officials, charges Fumento. This former AIDS analyst for the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights contends that estimates of the number of infected people, and of the risks to heterosexuals, have been grossly exaggerated, arguing further that the epidemic appears to be peaking. According to Fumento, two groups have fueled the alarmist myth: prudish conservative moralists and liberal “democratizers” eager to demonstrate that AIDS is not a “gay plague.” His allegation that AIDS research has drained funds from the fight against cancer will outrage activists who want more federal dollars spent on AIDS. Among this polemic’s more controversial or startling contentions is the assertion that the incidence of AIDS in Africa has been greatly overstated, and the claim that bisexuality among U.S. blacks and Hispanics, far more than that among whites, has played a major role in AIDS transmission.”

By: pzatchok

pzatchok — Mon, 25 Jul 2022 23:23:38 +0000

When they called for the second shot I knew that the first did not do anything. And then they called for a booster just 2 months later. Basically a third shot.

Its the new flu.

By: Cotour

Cotour — Mon, 25 Jul 2022 21:47:04 +0000

t-dub:

That would never happen “In a Democracy”. (Sarcasm)

By: t-dub

t-dub — Mon, 25 Jul 2022 21:20:40 +0000

Biden is taking a statin drug, Crestor, along with The Pfizer medication Paxlovid and several other medications. He is in more danger from the side effects of and drug interactions between the statin drug and Paxlovid then he is at risk from covid.

Also of interest, the “infamous” Dr. Brix just released her new book, which many people are calling a confessional, since she admits that they knew all along that the mRNA “vaccines” would not prevent transmission and contraction of covid. She then went on FOX news with Neil Cavuto to shill for Pfizer and Paxlovid which studies up to this point reveal that is has no discernable, beneficial, impact on covid cases.

The corruption will not change until people start going to jail.