Dr. Campbell reports on the reevaluated analysis of mRNA “Vaccine” trial data:

https://youtu.be/JYR1wz-Cf_M 14 min.

Dr. Campbell is the most objective, non-political medical professional who has been reporting on the Covid event, the “vaccine” and the good and bad that is the result of both. And over time he has IMO realized that what is going on between government and big pharma and their collusion, manipulations and censorship is something other than a concern for your health and safety. He is not happy at all, something else entirely is going on.

The old standards for the old vaccine technology science and the best medical practices for safety regarding the health risk to the public and adverse reactions to it. V The *NEW* science, *NEW* technology, and *NEW* *Best* medical practices regarding the health risk to the public and adverse reactions to it.

Swine Flu vaccine (1976)

1 serious adverse event per 100,000 people.

Result? Vaccine withdrawn.

Rotavirus vaccine (1999)

1 to 2 serious adverse events per 10,000 people.

Result? Vaccine withdrawn.

Covid mRNA “Vaccine” (2022)

1 serious adverse event per 800 people.

Result? “Vaccine” officially massively promoted.

Make sense to you?

What is this lowering of the established, proper and safe medical practices and standards in America and the world regarding the application of vaccines. V The *NEW* and *Improved* “vaccine” technology really about?

Are you paying attention yet?

https://s.yimg.com/uu/api/res/1.2/vmk2Jv6EPFueFOzY2MKZ2g–~B/aD0xMDAxO3c9MTQ0MDthcHBpZD15dGFjaHlvbg–/https://media.zenfs.com/en/the_conversation_us_articles_815/6ebde0a4a3b567848096bd1c8d1fe23a

Col Beausabre: Heh. I sat down many years ago. Note the conclusion of today’s blacklist column. The window for fixing things is rapidly closing, with no sign anyone in the right position is willing to push through that opening.

Headline from LA Times – Fauci’s warning to America: ‘We’re living in a progressively anti-science era and that’s a very dangerous thing”

Typical Left Wing deflection, accuse your opponents of practicing what you do

A 1999 translation reads “I have not as yet been able to discover the reason for these properties of gravity from phenomena, and I do not feign hypotheses. For whatever is not deduced from the phenomena must be called a hypothesis; and hypotheses, whether metaphysical or physical, or based on occult qualities, or mechanical, have no place in experimental philosophy. In this philosophy particular propositions are inferred from the phenomena, and afterwards rendered general by induction.”

I think Newton would concur with your emphasis on the supremacy of observable facts, especially since he had the experience of surviving a deadly plague himself.