Comments on: To environmentalists no warming and more bears means global warming and an endangered species https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/to-environmentalists-no-warming-and-more-bears-means-global-warming-and-an-endangered-species/ Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:44:39 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Edward https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/to-environmentalists-no-warming-and-more-bears-means-global-warming-and-an-endangered-species/#comment-141869 Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:44:39 +0000 http://behindtheblack.com/?p=27060#comment-141869 One has to wonder which climate the environmentalists want to have for the various species of the Earth.

Today’s environment? Al Gore’s 2006 environment? The Kyoto Agreement’s 1992 environment? The environment of 1900, 1850, 1600, 1000, or even Egypt’s 4000 BC (they had so much prosperity that they were able to expend resources to build several pyramids)?

How about the environment of 20000 BC? That was the midst of an ice age, and ice ages seem to be the normal climate on Earth, since they last longer than the interglacial periods.

]]> By: Cotour https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/to-environmentalists-no-warming-and-more-bears-means-global-warming-and-an-endangered-species/#comment-141756 Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:46:59 +0000 http://behindtheblack.com/?p=27060#comment-141756 Is it reasonable to see the earth and the life forms that live upon it and the universe as a whole for that matter as static systems? Because if you were to plug into the logic of some of the people that prognosticate on such things you might come to that conclusion.

]]>