Comments on: Today’s blacklisted Americans: All Republicans who questioned the November election count

By: Sam L.

Sam L. — Wed, 10 Feb 2021 20:11:51 +0000

I used to get missives for the SPLC, asking for “contributions”, until I returned one saying that I found them to be a hate group.

By: pzatchok

pzatchok — Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:06:34 +0000

If this does not scare someone them they are ignorant.

Ignorant of basic human rights, our constitution and history. Or just ignorant of the whole situation because of not being informed.

By: Luke

Luke — Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:20:09 +0000

I question that “too many Americans don’t care”.

The relatively apolitical moderate leftish folks I know are @#$&ing terrified.
They don’t want to attract attention, and have no idea what they can do to stop anything.
They care.
Their anger hasn’t overcome their fear, especially with no clear path forward.
But they care.

By: buddhahs

buddhahs — Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:41:48 +0000

The SPLC?

That’s the proper response to *anything* coming from that corrupt bunch of grifters.

The response to anyone citing them, however, should be immediate and forceful, showing their bias and their greed.

By: Ian C.

Ian C. — Wed, 10 Feb 2021 08:43:38 +0000

“you are by definition now a hater, a racist, and a bigot.”

Reads like my dating site profile. Chicks love it.

By: pzatchok

pzatchok — Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:34:49 +0000

Why do I get a happy feeling thinking that the left should run with this as fast and as far as possible.

It really is for our own safety and mental well being.

The re=education camps will be fun and just full of productive activities.

They really are smarter than the rest of us and we do need their leadership.

By: Edward

Edward — Wed, 10 Feb 2021 01:14:37 +0000

From the article: “The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has an answer, and it amounts to blacklisting more than half of the Republicans in Congress — if not expelling them altogether. For good measure, the SPLC also calls for the permanent social media ‘deplatforming’ of every ‘public figure’ who questioned the 2020 election results.”

Didn’t the Democrats insist upon and get four different investigations into the 2016 election results, based not upon evidence of any wrongdoing but upon innuendo and speculation? As I recall, each investigation came up with no evidence of wrongdoing. None at all.

It looks like actions by Democrats and The Party do not have to meet any standards. Democrats may question election results at a whim, but Republicans may not question election results even with eyewitness accounts, video recordings, and suspicious activities.

Indeed, the Democrats believe that the riot at the Capitol building was an insurrection against the government, but it was Trump’s government that was in power at the time, so the insurrection would have been against the Trump administration. Why would Trump supporters hold an insurrection against him? It happened at the very time that Congress was going through the procedure that Trump wanted to happen in order to give him a last chance to show that the election was fixed by Democrats. Why would Trump supporters want to disrupt this process? It would seem more likely that the Democrats would have staged such an action in order to disrupt the procedure and discredit Trump.

Oh, wait. That is exactly what happened.

Plus there is evidence that it was planned long in advance and that some Democrat Congressthings knew about it at least a week in advance.

We have seen countries before where there is one political party that may act freely and with impunity but all other political parties are either outlawed or severely restricted in their activities. None of them were the United States, and all were run badly and with terrible corruption.