<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 72 absurd items Obamacare requires your health insurance to cover.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/72-absurd-items-obamacare-requires-your-health-insurance-to-cover/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/72-absurd-items-obamacare-requires-your-health-insurance-to-cover/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 03:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Cotour		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/72-absurd-items-obamacare-requires-your-health-insurance-to-cover/#comment-120936</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cotour]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2013 03:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=25878#comment-120936</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[One of the reasons that I tend to despise BS &quot;intellectuals&quot; like Thomas Freidman. In his latest article he seems willing to overthrow any hint of  American Constitutionality for the &quot;dream&quot; of Obamacare for HIS approximation of what HE believes the economy should or will look like. When do these people in their belief system attempt to express / articulate that the Constitution and its concepts are primary and then you figure out how the future will play out. 

Why? 

Because they do not think that way and have left the tenets of the Constitution behind long ago and trade them for their &quot;more informed&quot; interpretation of what America &quot;should be&quot;. What an un-American, globalist, elitest pile of crap Freidman! 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/10/opinion/sunday/friedman-why-i-still-support-obamacare.html?hpw&#038;rref=opinion&#038;_r=0]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the reasons that I tend to despise BS &#8220;intellectuals&#8221; like Thomas Freidman. In his latest article he seems willing to overthrow any hint of  American Constitutionality for the &#8220;dream&#8221; of Obamacare for HIS approximation of what HE believes the economy should or will look like. When do these people in their belief system attempt to express / articulate that the Constitution and its concepts are primary and then you figure out how the future will play out. </p>
<p>Why? </p>
<p>Because they do not think that way and have left the tenets of the Constitution behind long ago and trade them for their &#8220;more informed&#8221; interpretation of what America &#8220;should be&#8221;. What an un-American, globalist, elitest pile of crap Freidman! </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/10/opinion/sunday/friedman-why-i-still-support-obamacare.html?hpw&#038;rref=opinion&#038;_r=0" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/10/opinion/sunday/friedman-why-i-still-support-obamacare.html?hpw&#038;rref=opinion&#038;_r=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
