<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A close review of the sources cited in the four studies that claimed a 97% scientific consensus supporting global warming has found that claim to be false.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-close-review-of-the-sources-cited-in-the-four-studies-that-claimed-a-97-scientific-consensus-supporting-global-warming-has-found-that-claim-to-be-false/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-close-review-of-the-sources-cited-in-the-four-studies-that-claimed-a-97-scientific-consensus-supporting-global-warming-has-found-that-claim-to-be-false/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:56:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ed		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-close-review-of-the-sources-cited-in-the-four-studies-that-claimed-a-97-scientific-consensus-supporting-global-warming-has-found-that-claim-to-be-false/#comment-143303</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Feb 2014 18:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=27285#comment-143303</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But 97% sure sounds good, doesn&#039;t it.  That&#039;s all that matters.  At least they allowed for a few dissenter, or I guess they are called deniers.  They could have gone with 99 44/100% pure.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But 97% sure sounds good, doesn&#8217;t it.  That&#8217;s all that matters.  At least they allowed for a few dissenter, or I guess they are called deniers.  They could have gone with 99 44/100% pure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
