<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A space journalist suddenly notices that the FCC has no legal authority to regulate space junk	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-space-journalist-suddenly-notices-that-the-fcc-has-no-legal-authority-to-regulate-space-junk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-space-journalist-suddenly-notices-that-the-fcc-has-no-legal-authority-to-regulate-space-junk/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 23:25:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: pawn		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-space-journalist-suddenly-notices-that-the-fcc-has-no-legal-authority-to-regulate-space-junk/#comment-1520051</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pawn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 23:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=108442#comment-1520051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;What this reporter should have known and reported is that both the House and the Senate have disgreed, forcefully. In the House one bill was introduced to give the de-orbit regulatory power to the FAA, while later rejecting a second bill that would have given that power to the FCC. The Senate meanwhile introduced its own bill giving this de-orbit regulatory power to the FAA and Commerce, not the FCC.&quot;

Thanks for pointing this out Bob. FCC needs to stay in it&#039;s wheelhouse.

Every bureaucrat want to be seen as relevant and Space is now sexy due to Elon.

The evolution of space law is going to be interesting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What this reporter should have known and reported is that both the House and the Senate have disgreed, forcefully. In the House one bill was introduced to give the de-orbit regulatory power to the FAA, while later rejecting a second bill that would have given that power to the FCC. The Senate meanwhile introduced its own bill giving this de-orbit regulatory power to the FAA and Commerce, not the FCC.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing this out Bob. FCC needs to stay in it&#8217;s wheelhouse.</p>
<p>Every bureaucrat want to be seen as relevant and Space is now sexy due to Elon.</p>
<p>The evolution of space law is going to be interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-space-journalist-suddenly-notices-that-the-fcc-has-no-legal-authority-to-regulate-space-junk/#comment-1520049</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 23:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=108442#comment-1520049</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robert, 
You are right.  I missed an entire paragraph!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,<br />
You are right.  I missed an entire paragraph!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Zimmerman		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-space-journalist-suddenly-notices-that-the-fcc-has-no-legal-authority-to-regulate-space-junk/#comment-1520042</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Zimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 22:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=108442#comment-1520042</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-space-journalist-suddenly-notices-that-the-fcc-has-no-legal-authority-to-regulate-space-junk/#comment-1520037&quot;&gt;Edward&lt;/a&gt;.

Edward: Thank you for providing a list of all my posts noting the FCC&#039;s illegal power grab. However, you did not read my post very carefully. I made it very clear I have been covering this subject for years, while Space News has not. To quote the 2nd paragraph after the blockquote: &quot;As an old-fashioned American who believes in freedom and limited government (as clearly established by our Constitution) I had recognized this legal fact immediately in January 2023, when the FCC first made its power grab.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-space-journalist-suddenly-notices-that-the-fcc-has-no-legal-authority-to-regulate-space-junk/#comment-1520037">Edward</a>.</p>
<p>Edward: Thank you for providing a list of all my posts noting the FCC&#8217;s illegal power grab. However, you did not read my post very carefully. I made it very clear I have been covering this subject for years, while Space News has not. To quote the 2nd paragraph after the blockquote: &#8220;As an old-fashioned American who believes in freedom and limited government (as clearly established by our Constitution) I had recognized this legal fact immediately in January 2023, when the FCC first made its power grab.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-space-journalist-suddenly-notices-that-the-fcc-has-no-legal-authority-to-regulate-space-junk/#comment-1520037</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 22:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=108442#comment-1520037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robert, 
Haven&#039;t you been pointing out for a few years that the FCC is overreaching its authority?  You didn&#039;t mention that in your post, making it sound as though Space News (which I have been reading for almost 30 years) is the first to notice.  This may be a partial list of the posts in which you noted the FCC&#039;s overreach: 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/fcc-decides-to-expand-its-power-in-space/ 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-proposes-new-regulation-requiring-satellites-to-be-de-orbited-five-years-after-mission-end/ 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-approves-new-regulation-requiring-defunct-satellite-deorbit-in-five-years/ 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/head-of-commerces-space-office-questions-new-fcc-regulations-on-space-junk/ 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-chief-proposes-agency-reorganization-of-its-space-related-bureaucracy/ 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/several-major-rocket-companies-to-the-fcc-stay-out/ 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-votes-to-create-its-own-space-bureaucracy-despite-lacking-statutory-authority/ 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/house-subcommittee-proposes-five-bills-that-would-change-fcc-operations/ 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-makes-official-its-regulatory-power-grab-beyond-its-statutory-authority/ 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/house-rejects-fcc-bill-because-the-bill-approved-fccs-recent-power-grab/ 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/senate-committee-gives-nasa-and-commerce-responsibility-for-removing-space-junk/ 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/unless-congress-truly-acts-soon-the-unelected-administrative-state-will-rule-unopposed/ 

https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/faa-and-fcc-now-competing-for-the-honor-of-regulating-commercial-space-more/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,<br />
Haven&#8217;t you been pointing out for a few years that the FCC is overreaching its authority?  You didn&#8217;t mention that in your post, making it sound as though Space News (which I have been reading for almost 30 years) is the first to notice.  This may be a partial list of the posts in which you noted the FCC&#8217;s overreach: </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/fcc-decides-to-expand-its-power-in-space/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/fcc-decides-to-expand-its-power-in-space/</a> </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-proposes-new-regulation-requiring-satellites-to-be-de-orbited-five-years-after-mission-end/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-proposes-new-regulation-requiring-satellites-to-be-de-orbited-five-years-after-mission-end/</a> </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-approves-new-regulation-requiring-defunct-satellite-deorbit-in-five-years/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-approves-new-regulation-requiring-defunct-satellite-deorbit-in-five-years/</a> </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/head-of-commerces-space-office-questions-new-fcc-regulations-on-space-junk/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/head-of-commerces-space-office-questions-new-fcc-regulations-on-space-junk/</a> </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-chief-proposes-agency-reorganization-of-its-space-related-bureaucracy/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-chief-proposes-agency-reorganization-of-its-space-related-bureaucracy/</a> </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/several-major-rocket-companies-to-the-fcc-stay-out/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/several-major-rocket-companies-to-the-fcc-stay-out/</a> </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-votes-to-create-its-own-space-bureaucracy-despite-lacking-statutory-authority/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-votes-to-create-its-own-space-bureaucracy-despite-lacking-statutory-authority/</a> </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/house-subcommittee-proposes-five-bills-that-would-change-fcc-operations/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/house-subcommittee-proposes-five-bills-that-would-change-fcc-operations/</a> </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-makes-official-its-regulatory-power-grab-beyond-its-statutory-authority/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fcc-makes-official-its-regulatory-power-grab-beyond-its-statutory-authority/</a> </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/house-rejects-fcc-bill-because-the-bill-approved-fccs-recent-power-grab/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/house-rejects-fcc-bill-because-the-bill-approved-fccs-recent-power-grab/</a> </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/senate-committee-gives-nasa-and-commerce-responsibility-for-removing-space-junk/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/senate-committee-gives-nasa-and-commerce-responsibility-for-removing-space-junk/</a> </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/unless-congress-truly-acts-soon-the-unelected-administrative-state-will-rule-unopposed/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/essays-and-commentaries/unless-congress-truly-acts-soon-the-unelected-administrative-state-will-rule-unopposed/</a> </p>
<p><a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/faa-and-fcc-now-competing-for-the-honor-of-regulating-commercial-space-more/" rel="ugc">https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/faa-and-fcc-now-competing-for-the-honor-of-regulating-commercial-space-more/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brewingfrog		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-space-journalist-suddenly-notices-that-the-fcc-has-no-legal-authority-to-regulate-space-junk/#comment-1520009</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brewingfrog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 18:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=108442#comment-1520009</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I believe &quot;thunk&quot; is acceptable for the past-tense of &quot;think&quot; in these present days. After all, Dizzy Dean used the word &quot;slud&quot; as a past-tense of &quot;slid&quot; fairly often, and who will object to what the estimable Mr. Dean has to say?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe &#8220;thunk&#8221; is acceptable for the past-tense of &#8220;think&#8221; in these present days. After all, Dizzy Dean used the word &#8220;slud&#8221; as a past-tense of &#8220;slid&#8221; fairly often, and who will object to what the estimable Mr. Dean has to say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chester Peake		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/a-space-journalist-suddenly-notices-that-the-fcc-has-no-legal-authority-to-regulate-space-junk/#comment-1519998</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chester Peake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2024 17:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=108442#comment-1519998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Addressing the orbital debris issue is something which really does need to be done.  The FCC is poorly qualified to do so, however.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Addressing the orbital debris issue is something which really does need to be done.  The FCC is poorly qualified to do so, however.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
