<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: After successfully completing its standard prelaunch static fire, SpaceX has delayed the Sunday Falcon 9 commercial launch at the request of its customer which wishes to do further tests of the six satellites on board.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/after-successfully-completing-its-standard-prelaunch-static-fire-spacex-has-delayed-the-sunday-falcon-9-commercial-launch-at-the-request-of-its-customer-which-wishes-to-do-further-tests-of-the-six-sa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/after-successfully-completing-its-standard-prelaunch-static-fire-spacex-has-delayed-the-sunday-falcon-9-commercial-launch-at-the-request-of-its-customer-which-wishes-to-do-further-tests-of-the-six-sa/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 22:48:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: geoffc		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/after-successfully-completing-its-standard-prelaunch-static-fire-spacex-has-delayed-the-sunday-falcon-9-commercial-launch-at-the-request-of-its-customer-which-wishes-to-do-further-tests-of-the-six-sa/#comment-171163</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[geoffc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 22:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28874#comment-171163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SpaceX only has room for one core at the Florida (LC-40) site, and apparently only room for one payload in the clean room.  Question is, will they expand for Falcon Heavy at LC40?  Or just launch it from LC-39A?

They need to increase their facilities there.  With LC-39A they will have a second site, but still needs to be room for more than one booster and payload at each site.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SpaceX only has room for one core at the Florida (LC-40) site, and apparently only room for one payload in the clean room.  Question is, will they expand for Falcon Heavy at LC40?  Or just launch it from LC-39A?</p>
<p>They need to increase their facilities there.  With LC-39A they will have a second site, but still needs to be room for more than one booster and payload at each site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mivenho		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/after-successfully-completing-its-standard-prelaunch-static-fire-spacex-has-delayed-the-sunday-falcon-9-commercial-launch-at-the-request-of-its-customer-which-wishes-to-do-further-tests-of-the-six-sa/#comment-171151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mivenho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2014 19:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=28874#comment-171151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hope SpaceX is charging the customer for all of this down time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope SpaceX is charging the customer for all of this down time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
