<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Amazon investors sue company for not considering SpaceX as potential launch provider	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/amazon-investors-sue-company-for-not-considering-spacex-as-potential-launch-provider/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/amazon-investors-sue-company-for-not-considering-spacex-as-potential-launch-provider/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2023 21:37:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Mike Borgelt		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/amazon-investors-sue-company-for-not-considering-spacex-as-potential-launch-provider/#comment-1426178</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike Borgelt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2023 21:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=98143#comment-1426178</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No way would Musk give Kuiper priority over Starlink, his cash cow. He&#039;d likely allocate some paying launches at a stiff premium.
Make money while shafting Bezos.
I sure wouldn&#039;t put money into Kuiper. Musk has first mover advantage, already has improved the satellites and when Starship flies, the ability to build out his constellation far faster than Bezos can.
I think the Amazon investors are going to lose their money on this one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way would Musk give Kuiper priority over Starlink, his cash cow. He&#8217;d likely allocate some paying launches at a stiff premium.<br />
Make money while shafting Bezos.<br />
I sure wouldn&#8217;t put money into Kuiper. Musk has first mover advantage, already has improved the satellites and when Starship flies, the ability to build out his constellation far faster than Bezos can.<br />
I think the Amazon investors are going to lose their money on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James Street		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/amazon-investors-sue-company-for-not-considering-spacex-as-potential-launch-provider/#comment-1426084</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Street]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Sep 2023 00:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=98143#comment-1426084</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Primary responsibility of a corporation: maximize profit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Primary responsibility of a corporation: maximize profit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BillB		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/amazon-investors-sue-company-for-not-considering-spacex-as-potential-launch-provider/#comment-1426071</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BillB]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 23:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=98143#comment-1426071</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It occurred to me while reading the post that Amazon’s Project Kuiper may just be a money laundering scheme.  What gives me that sense are the delays of all three launch providers having an orbital launch capability for Kuiper.  Maybe this will get Jeff to get over his ego and actually pay the going rate for Falcon 9 launches. As Diane Wilson pointed out, Kuiper will get launch priority over Starlink.  What better way to poke at Elon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It occurred to me while reading the post that Amazon’s Project Kuiper may just be a money laundering scheme.  What gives me that sense are the delays of all three launch providers having an orbital launch capability for Kuiper.  Maybe this will get Jeff to get over his ego and actually pay the going rate for Falcon 9 launches. As Diane Wilson pointed out, Kuiper will get launch priority over Starlink.  What better way to poke at Elon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Van Dune		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/amazon-investors-sue-company-for-not-considering-spacex-as-potential-launch-provider/#comment-1426052</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Van Dune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 18:21:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=98143#comment-1426052</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Maybe that would have given Musk the opportunity to charge Bezos a non-refundable cash-on-the-barrel deposit of 100%, plus a 100% priority-bump fee, also in cash?

Just kidding. Maybe.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe that would have given Musk the opportunity to charge Bezos a non-refundable cash-on-the-barrel deposit of 100%, plus a 100% priority-bump fee, also in cash?</p>
<p>Just kidding. Maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Diane Wilson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/amazon-investors-sue-company-for-not-considering-spacex-as-potential-launch-provider/#comment-1426046</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Diane Wilson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 17:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=98143#comment-1426046</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If Amazon really wanted to hurt Starlink, they could have bought all 83 launches on SpaceX, not only providing the least expensive launch service, but also ensuring that Kuiper launches would have priority over Starlink launches. SpaceX has always given priority to paying customers, as they did with OneWeb. Starlink gets the launch slots that aren&#039;t taken by paying customers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Amazon really wanted to hurt Starlink, they could have bought all 83 launches on SpaceX, not only providing the least expensive launch service, but also ensuring that Kuiper launches would have priority over Starlink launches. SpaceX has always given priority to paying customers, as they did with OneWeb. Starlink gets the launch slots that aren&#8217;t taken by paying customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jay		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/amazon-investors-sue-company-for-not-considering-spacex-as-potential-launch-provider/#comment-1426039</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 16:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=98143#comment-1426039</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Reading the contracts and lawsuit, it was discussed that a fourth launch provider&#039;s name was redacted.  Most likely that name was SpaceX.

All I can say is don&#039;t mess with the Teamsters, or Jeff Bezos will end up like Jimmy Hoffa.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading the contracts and lawsuit, it was discussed that a fourth launch provider&#8217;s name was redacted.  Most likely that name was SpaceX.</p>
<p>All I can say is don&#8217;t mess with the Teamsters, or Jeff Bezos will end up like Jimmy Hoffa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
