<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Another court rules against Obamacare subsidies	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-court-rules-against-obamacare-subsidies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-court-rules-against-obamacare-subsidies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:20:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Cotour		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-court-rules-against-obamacare-subsidies/#comment-330717</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cotour]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=31075#comment-330717</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-court-rules-against-obamacare-subsidies/#comment-330692&quot;&gt;Cotour&lt;/a&gt;.

Maybe they can change it back to a penalty instead of a tax? That has been done before you know.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-court-rules-against-obamacare-subsidies/#comment-330692">Cotour</a>.</p>
<p>Maybe they can change it back to a penalty instead of a tax? That has been done before you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cotour		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-court-rules-against-obamacare-subsidies/#comment-330692</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cotour]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 23:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=31075#comment-330692</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;The role of this Court is to apply the statute as it is written&quot;, what a concept!

Is this judge is actually saying that the words and their meaning that are contained within the law must be followed?  He or she must have had some sort of mental breakdown. They must not know how the Obama administration gets a pass on such ordinary and mundane details.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The role of this Court is to apply the statute as it is written&#8221;, what a concept!</p>
<p>Is this judge is actually saying that the words and their meaning that are contained within the law must be followed?  He or she must have had some sort of mental breakdown. They must not know how the Obama administration gets a pass on such ordinary and mundane details.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
