<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Another two hard radical Sanders campaign field workers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-two-hard-radical-sanders-campaign-field-workers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-two-hard-radical-sanders-campaign-field-workers/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2020 01:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: wayne		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-two-hard-radical-sanders-campaign-field-workers/#comment-1076089</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2020 01:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63255#comment-1076089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Mitch--
Here we go....

Steven Crowder does Bernie doing Alice Cooper
&quot;Eighty&quot;
Show #620 Intro parody video
1-31-202
https://youtu.be/WDjqzF_FeTw?t=33]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch&#8211;<br />
Here we go&#8230;.</p>
<p>Steven Crowder does Bernie doing Alice Cooper<br />
&#8220;Eighty&#8221;<br />
Show #620 Intro parody video<br />
1-31-202<br />
<a href="https://youtu.be/WDjqzF_FeTw?t=33" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/WDjqzF_FeTw?t=33</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mitch S.		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-two-hard-radical-sanders-campaign-field-workers/#comment-1075967</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mitch S.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 23:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63255#comment-1075967</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Having deja vu.
Oh yeah 1968, when Bernie was still under 30 years old...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRLwV2xafpk

(PS remember who won that election)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having deja vu.<br />
Oh yeah 1968, when Bernie was still under 30 years old&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRLwV2xafpk" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rRLwV2xafpk</a></p>
<p>(PS remember who won that election)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cotour		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-two-hard-radical-sanders-campaign-field-workers/#comment-1075951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cotour]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 17:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63255#comment-1075951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I want to share a segment of a now week plus long conversation I am having with a committed Soros &quot;Open Society&quot; Liberal lawyer. It is very instructive. Two different realities? Or just two different strategic (S.O.M.) interpretations? The subjects run from Globalism to &quot;Progressive&quot;. Choose your side.

------------

And it continues, the battles rages: Word games when the definition of Globalism has been and is clearly understood in the context of this conversation.

-------------

My Friend: 

Define Globalist.

As I have explained to you before, your definition (the King Orange / Alex Jones definition) is a bunch of propaganda.  You cannot use the same word to describe two different concepts.  When I said there are no &quot;globalists&quot; I was using your definition.  

Here is a further explication on how your right wing propagandists use the word as a slur:  
Conversely, this is what it really means:  https://www.theglobalist.com/who-is-a-globalist-platform/
You cannot simplistically  prove that Soros is a &quot;globalist&quot; (Alex Jones slur) because he uses the word globalist.  

-----------------

My response: 

I have plainly and pretty concisely defined Globalism as &quot;I&quot; define it. I have been very specific in what I believe will be the resulting effects from Globalism&#039;s implementation and that would be the necessity of reworking or &quot;Improving&quot; (Subjective) of the American Constitution as it was intended. And IMO that would be deleterious to our country and the world for that matter. Mr. Soros himself has stated as much himself, this power transformation is &quot;necessary&quot;. I have been very, very clear and there can be no confusion on your part related to my thinking on the subject. None what so ever, and your continued rhetoric on the subject is just an attempt not to better understand but to obfuscate.

When I put the word Globalist in quotations that indicates what my interpretation of what Mr. Soros has subjectively transmitted to me about his intents through his own words and actions. This is based on the organizations and causes that he plainly and clearly supports so generously with his money, and his statements on the subject. Want to know what a man really thinks and is about? Learn what he spends his money on. And Mr. Soros has plainly indicated to me what the results of his activities will or must result in. 

So how the word Globalist is defined in the media is of no concern to me, you must by now clearly understand my definition and if it is a slur to you then so be it. The word is offensive to me also, but obviously for a different reason. Its all how you choose to see and interpret it. And that brings us to our next and related issue: &quot;Progressivism&quot;. What the hell is that?

And this conversation is a great example of how a segment of &quot;Progressivism&quot; operates. As in all Leftist oriented psychological operations words and terms are very important and are usurped and redefined to where up is down, left is right and good is bad. With only the best intentions of course.

The term itself is an example of how it operates, &quot;Progressive&quot;, who would not want to make progress? Or &quot;Democrat Socialist&quot;, who does not want to be Democratic? If your not for Democracy then you must be something else, maybe a Nazi? Maybe a White Supremacist? And in reality it is just the repackaging of Socialism in an attempt to make it more palatable for the young and pliable in the masses.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to share a segment of a now week plus long conversation I am having with a committed Soros &#8220;Open Society&#8221; Liberal lawyer. It is very instructive. Two different realities? Or just two different strategic (S.O.M.) interpretations? The subjects run from Globalism to &#8220;Progressive&#8221;. Choose your side.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>And it continues, the battles rages: Word games when the definition of Globalism has been and is clearly understood in the context of this conversation.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>My Friend: </p>
<p>Define Globalist.</p>
<p>As I have explained to you before, your definition (the King Orange / Alex Jones definition) is a bunch of propaganda.  You cannot use the same word to describe two different concepts.  When I said there are no &#8220;globalists&#8221; I was using your definition.  </p>
<p>Here is a further explication on how your right wing propagandists use the word as a slur:<br />
Conversely, this is what it really means:  <a href="https://www.theglobalist.com/who-is-a-globalist-platform/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.theglobalist.com/who-is-a-globalist-platform/</a><br />
You cannot simplistically  prove that Soros is a &#8220;globalist&#8221; (Alex Jones slur) because he uses the word globalist.  </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>My response: </p>
<p>I have plainly and pretty concisely defined Globalism as &#8220;I&#8221; define it. I have been very specific in what I believe will be the resulting effects from Globalism&#8217;s implementation and that would be the necessity of reworking or &#8220;Improving&#8221; (Subjective) of the American Constitution as it was intended. And IMO that would be deleterious to our country and the world for that matter. Mr. Soros himself has stated as much himself, this power transformation is &#8220;necessary&#8221;. I have been very, very clear and there can be no confusion on your part related to my thinking on the subject. None what so ever, and your continued rhetoric on the subject is just an attempt not to better understand but to obfuscate.</p>
<p>When I put the word Globalist in quotations that indicates what my interpretation of what Mr. Soros has subjectively transmitted to me about his intents through his own words and actions. This is based on the organizations and causes that he plainly and clearly supports so generously with his money, and his statements on the subject. Want to know what a man really thinks and is about? Learn what he spends his money on. And Mr. Soros has plainly indicated to me what the results of his activities will or must result in. </p>
<p>So how the word Globalist is defined in the media is of no concern to me, you must by now clearly understand my definition and if it is a slur to you then so be it. The word is offensive to me also, but obviously for a different reason. Its all how you choose to see and interpret it. And that brings us to our next and related issue: &#8220;Progressivism&#8221;. What the hell is that?</p>
<p>And this conversation is a great example of how a segment of &#8220;Progressivism&#8221; operates. As in all Leftist oriented psychological operations words and terms are very important and are usurped and redefined to where up is down, left is right and good is bad. With only the best intentions of course.</p>
<p>The term itself is an example of how it operates, &#8220;Progressive&#8221;, who would not want to make progress? Or &#8220;Democrat Socialist&#8221;, who does not want to be Democratic? If your not for Democracy then you must be something else, maybe a Nazi? Maybe a White Supremacist? And in reality it is just the repackaging of Socialism in an attempt to make it more palatable for the young and pliable in the masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phill O		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-two-hard-radical-sanders-campaign-field-workers/#comment-1075940</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phill O]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63255#comment-1075940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[General Mattis writes after the Obama administration did not follow through on the red line in Syria &quot;And America today lives with the consequences of embolden adversaries and shaken allies.&quot;

He also writes about taking out Osama bin Laden without telling the Pakistani government, that any chance at using the  Pakistanis as an ally was eliminated.

The Bernie people are a direct fallout of the Weather Underground with Bill Ayers, of which Obama was the next generation!

I have no hope for the free world if this is allowed to continue!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>General Mattis writes after the Obama administration did not follow through on the red line in Syria &#8220;And America today lives with the consequences of embolden adversaries and shaken allies.&#8221;</p>
<p>He also writes about taking out Osama bin Laden without telling the Pakistani government, that any chance at using the  Pakistanis as an ally was eliminated.</p>
<p>The Bernie people are a direct fallout of the Weather Underground with Bill Ayers, of which Obama was the next generation!</p>
<p>I have no hope for the free world if this is allowed to continue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phil Berardelli		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-two-hard-radical-sanders-campaign-field-workers/#comment-1075938</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil Berardelli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 14:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63255#comment-1075938</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been saying and writing this for several years now, and I will continue to do so until it gets beaten like a drum into the heads of these fools. It is reckless in the extreme to threaten violence against a population within which are more than 100 million armed individuals -- by far the largest in the world -- many of whom have been superbly trained in the arts of covert warfare. If they continue along this path, they will invite their own destruction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been saying and writing this for several years now, and I will continue to do so until it gets beaten like a drum into the heads of these fools. It is reckless in the extreme to threaten violence against a population within which are more than 100 million armed individuals &#8212; by far the largest in the world &#8212; many of whom have been superbly trained in the arts of covert warfare. If they continue along this path, they will invite their own destruction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-two-hard-radical-sanders-campaign-field-workers/#comment-1075931</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 05:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63255#comment-1075931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jerry I know your saying that in jest, but &quot;if Bernie pulls it off&quot; that would be the last of the American peoples problems to worry about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jerry I know your saying that in jest, but &#8220;if Bernie pulls it off&#8221; that would be the last of the American peoples problems to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jerry Greenwood		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/another-two-hard-radical-sanders-campaign-field-workers/#comment-1075926</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jerry Greenwood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2020 03:58:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=63255#comment-1075926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If Bernie pulls it off we might be looking at some future ambassadors for posting in South America.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Bernie pulls it off we might be looking at some future ambassadors for posting in South America.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
