I figure both COVID and the vaccine are causing the same or similar problems. I didn’t get the jab, but I did get COVID three weeks ago. I thought the CDC guidelines were written like a bad joke so I followed the Zelenko and i-Mask+ protocols. Being in my early 40s and in good health, I had a fever for a few days, a dry cough, runny nose, and was tired. That was it. It ended up being the most restful vacation I’ve been on in years. Of course I have no idea if I have permanent internal damage and that’s worrisome, but dealing with the symptoms was about 10% as bad as having the flu and that made me furious about the lockdowns. I think the Great Barrington Declaration is the way to go.

Lujan: 50

Ridge: 77

The potential irony is massive.

“Leading Pennsylvania Democrat Candidate for U.S. Senate John Fetterman Suffers Stroke” 2022

“Democratic Sen. Ben Ray Lujan suffered a stroke, which could complicate Biden’s Supreme Court plans” 2022

“Spokesman: Tom Ridge hospitalized with a stroke. Former PA governor in stable but critical condition” 2021

Now three strokes among politicians does not a trend make, but this and other related health issues might be an interesting thing to keep watching.

They are all shot up, but then again, they all breath air and drink water also.

I might expect that the number of stroke stats along with deaths would increase in both year 2021 and 2022 if the “Vaccine” was involved in any negative manner. (???????)

Time will tell the tale, the numbers will be the numbers.

There is a belief that the political reaction to the Wuhan flu caused a serious disruption in the societal interactions that we humans have with each other. These drastic changes seem to have had serious impacts on happiness, healthiness, and the ability to cope. Overdose deaths increased, access to healthcare was denied to many, and many people lived in fear. The quality of life decreased immensely during the Great Oppression (which is not entirely over, but is mostly so). Many people believe that this had a terrible effect on the death rates across all age groups.

The third quarter of 2021 is when booster shots started being recommended or mandated. Some of the adverse reactions to these shots seemed to occur at a higher rate to younger people and sometimes to women. The shots seemed to be best for the older people, those over 75, and seemed to be of little harm to that same group, but we see great harm to younger people, especially athletic people (generally younger).

I suspect that as we stop the panic, return to normal pre-2020 lives, and the younger people stop taking the vaxxination and its boosters, we will finally get back to normal death rates again.

The government’s reaction to the Wuhan flu, overbearing tyranny, has been a complete cluster bleep.

Welcome to Obama’s fundamentally transformed America, land of the formerly free.

Anecdotally, among my co-workers, we believe we are seeing a large increase in strokes and stroke-like conditions. COVID causes blood clots, and most COVID cases are mild or completely asymptomatic, which doesn’t mean it isn’t causing some damage! The vax seems also to cause clots, and even vaxed people easily catch COVID even if they are less likely to die from it.

The uptick in overall deaths is completely unsurprising given the above. Even before COVID we dealt with the occasional heart attack or stroke in a younger person. Vaxed or not vaxed, I expect to continue seeing a lot more of these. I have not personally had a patient with an unexplained loss of immune function. So far at least, the excess deaths seem perfectly explainable by the increase in blood clots.

The shots are considered dangerous and unavailable to the public until vigorous experimentation can be performed, but this was rushed to human experimentation, bypassing the normal testing on animals due to “emergency authorization” in “operation warp speed”. The need to do “something” even if it was the wrong thing, throwing caution to the wind with the aid of unlimited funds greasing the wheels.

An experimental vaccine, that under normal circumstances would not be allowed unless it was “end of life treatment”, no hope of recovery.
All such treatments are closely watched and documented with regular follow ups by the doctors and the pharmaceuticals that provided the experimental treatment… This is strictly regulated by law. If you received an experimental vaccine, and received no follow up examinations, bloodwork, and consultation… All parties involved in your treatment can be held responsible.
“Under normal conditions”, but all parties involved have been given a license to kill, no responsibility for any deaths due to a bad product!
They didn’t care what their product did as long as they couldn’t be held liable for the results. They even omit that they had no clue what the long-term ramifications would be, or how long it would last… Or if it would work at all.
The recent data dump of 80,000 pages revealed that they knew it was no better than 12% effective for seven days. But they falsified data because they had an Iron clad agreement that they could not be held liable. The government and its representatives who have been receiving their payments are complicit and refuse to drop the liability claim even though fraud has been proven.
“It’s good to be king”

The most recent concession to the overwhelming evidence…
https://newstarget.com/2022-05-10-fda-admits-covid-vaccines-cause-blood-clots.html

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/coronavirus-covid-19-update-fda-limits-use-janssen-covid-19-vaccine-certain-individuals

And the running tally on athletes having heart attacks in the prime of their lives.
https://goodsciencing.com/covid/athletes-suffer-cardiac-arrest-die-after-covid-shot/

What her initial findings show is that there is an increase in overall mortality among those who take the mRNA based vaccines vs the adenovirus based vaccines. The video is 35 minutes and worth watching.

More importantly, tying these particular deaths to overall mortality does not really hold up. If we ascribe every single one to the 55-64 age group, where 50,000 or so people die of coronary heart disease and >300K every year for all causes, those 700 deaths are really not moving the needle much.

700 additional deaths is still very bad news. I completely agree with Dr. S regarding mass experimentation on human subjects without informed consent. And the government is obviously not being transparent about any of this.

https://www.soa.org/48ff80/globalassets/assets/files/resources/research-report/2022/group-life-covid-19-mortality.pdf

Well, well, well, “Note that since the July 2021 iteration of this report, the CDC has made a change to their methodology of estimating
excess deaths to use six years of prior historical data rather than four. This change resulted in an increase in the weekly expected number
of deaths by an average of 2% throughout the pandemic, which, in turn, decreased the estimates of total excess deaths.”

“In other words, since the deed has been done, why scare yourself? Make believe the problem doesn’t exist. Things will be far better that way, even as governments and businesses continue to insist that people get jabbed.” Nothing to see here…move along.

With the so-called vaccines, full informed consent should have included the admonition “long-term adverse side effects of this new treatment are unknown.”

Instead what we got was, in effect, “it’s the safest and most secure election, er, vaccine, ever!”

Interesting that the bad effects of the jab are grouped together. I wonder whether the mRna jab and the J&J versions would show up differently on the above graphs if they were differentiated.

Also I wonder whether there are some self treatments to prevent the long term side effects.

First, this appears to be begging the question when it says ‘and it’s not due to Covid because this group isn’t particularly vulnerable.’ 25-54 year olds generally don’t drop dead so a small increase in mortality in numbers can lead to a big increase in percentage rate.

Second, I can’t find the original study so I can’t tell if this accounts for people who may have had Covid without knowing it. While Covid generally manifests as a mild illness particularly in younger people, there is considerable evidence that it does lasting damage to the circulatory system in a significant percentage of otherwise mild cases. Given that many people who had Covid were never diagnosed as such, there is a lot of room for causality here.

Third, I would want to see this data split out between all-cause mortality and suicide/drug ODs, given what we know about those, especially in younger people.

Last, I am deeply skeptical of vaccine narratives from partisan sources on both sides. The dynamic of our culture today is intellectually decadent in that we are so rich and secure that we can afford to be wrong about a great many things. People are more concerned about being seen as being on their team than they are with being right.

This means that the minute any issue emerges, we can depend on our political dynamic to almost immediately fracture into “A” and “Not A” sides. While this has some utility as a search algorithm for finding the truth at a societal scale, it is very inefficient, particularly at an individual level. It is very obvious to me that if Covid had blown up in 2019, then vaccine skepticism (particularly among black Americans) would have been the Left’s issue. We know this because it was for a brief moment during the election when notable leftists were declaring they weren’t going to take any “Trump shots.”

I refer to all that as decadence because it is a luxury to be able to indulge in that kind of partisanship on an issue which is not fundamentally political. In a truly existential crisis, one cannot afford to be anything other than pragmatic and evidence-based.

I think in the end the insurance companies will be the final indicator about what is what related to Covid, deaths and the “Vaccine”.

And it is still an unknown whether there will be increased deaths over time and not just in the year the “Vaccine” was initially taken.