the galaxy is probably a few billion years old, rather than one billion

timescape says observers in voids experience ~30% faster passage of time

the upshot is that our distance/time measurements based on the flat FLRW equations need to be adjusted for inhomogeneities

these adjustments were small enough in the pre-Webb era that they could not be distinguished from LCDM

but at high redshift the oddities start to crop up in galaxies that appear mature right after reionization, with oxygen and mature formations

last year the PANTHEON database provided a pretty good fit to timescape predictions… the Euclid results are sufficiently detailed to either rule it out or make timescape the new standard model, hopefully within the next year or two (QR1 might not be enough but the first full release is 30x larger)

The political correctness makes my teeth hurt. If the Chinese want to name discoveries, they can put up their own telescopes.