<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Astronomers successfully predict appearance of supernova	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/astronomers-successfully-predict-appearance-of-supernova/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/astronomers-successfully-predict-appearance-of-supernova/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:45:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Max		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/astronomers-successfully-predict-appearance-of-supernova/#comment-837644</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=37188#comment-837644</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[He is right to be skeptical of gravitational lensing.  Light bends differently at different wavelengths and is scattered.  Without a  correction lens to reestablish focus,  light is hopelessly scattered and defused.  Shine a light into a curved mirror or a prism...
  The new curved TVs scatter background reflections so it does not interfere with the movie picture.
    Any gravity field strong enough to bend light, will also have a time distortion. This will change the lights frequency to a lower level. (Blue light will be made red. Speed or direction does not change the frequency of light, just its amplitude) 
     Magnetism also causes resistance. A galaxy with the strong magnetic field would also distort light near it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He is right to be skeptical of gravitational lensing.  Light bends differently at different wavelengths and is scattered.  Without a  correction lens to reestablish focus,  light is hopelessly scattered and defused.  Shine a light into a curved mirror or a prism&#8230;<br />
  The new curved TVs scatter background reflections so it does not interfere with the movie picture.<br />
    Any gravity field strong enough to bend light, will also have a time distortion. This will change the lights frequency to a lower level. (Blue light will be made red. Speed or direction does not change the frequency of light, just its amplitude)<br />
     Magnetism also causes resistance. A galaxy with the strong magnetic field would also distort light near it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/astronomers-successfully-predict-appearance-of-supernova/#comment-837037</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2015 00:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=37188#comment-837037</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was going to ask the same thing.  One of Enstein&#039;s truly beautiful predictions confirmed extensively.  

This is quite an accomplishment.  I&#039;m wondering if they&#039;re getting useful spectra of the initial blast.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to ask the same thing.  One of Enstein&#8217;s truly beautiful predictions confirmed extensively.  </p>
<p>This is quite an accomplishment.  I&#8217;m wondering if they&#8217;re getting useful spectra of the initial blast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mpthompson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/astronomers-successfully-predict-appearance-of-supernova/#comment-836525</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mpthompson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 05:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=37188#comment-836525</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[When you say you have been skeptical of gravitational lensing, what are you skeptical about?  It seems that gravitational lensing is a fairly well understood phenomena with some spectacular photos of the effect captured by Hubble.  Dark matter on the other hand still seems very much a mystery.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you say you have been skeptical of gravitational lensing, what are you skeptical about?  It seems that gravitational lensing is a fairly well understood phenomena with some spectacular photos of the effect captured by Hubble.  Dark matter on the other hand still seems very much a mystery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
