Scroll down to read this post.

 

Readers!

 

The time has come for my annual short pre-Thanksgiving/Christmas fund drive for Behind The Black. I must do this every year in order to make sure I have earned enough money to pay my bills.

 

For this two-week campaign, I am offering a special deal to encourage donations. Donations of $200 will get a free autographed copy of the new paperback edition of Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8, while donations of $250 will get a free autographed copy of the new hardback edition. If you desire a copy, make sure you provide me your address with your donation.

 

As I noted in July, the support of my readers through the years has given me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Only now does it appear that Washington might finally recognize this reality.

 

In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.

 

Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:

 

4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


Bigelow proposes extending life of its ISS module beyond its two year demo

Bigelow Aerospace is in negotiations with NASA to allow use on ISS of its demonstration inflatable BEAM module beyond its planned two year test mission.

BEAM is designed for a two-year mission on the ISS. The module is closed off from the rest of the station most of the time, with astronauts periodically entering BEAM to check the status of the module and instruments mounted inside.

NASA has previously indicated that it would dispose of BEAM at the end of its two-year mission, using the station’s robotic arm to detach the module and allow it to burn up in the atmosphere. There are no immediate plans, though, for use of the docking port where BEAM is installed after that two-year mission ends, opening the possibility for an extended mission.

Robert Bigelow has previously suggested there was commercial interest in the module. As a NASA press conference in April 2016 prior to the launch of BEAM, he said there were four different groups, both countries and companies, interested in flying experiments in BEAM. “We’re hoping that, maybe in half a year or something, we can get permission from NASA to accommodate these people in some way,” he said then.

It is typical NASA behavior to throw this module out after two years, rather than find a way to use it.

Posted from a hotel room in St. Louis, Missouri.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. from any other book seller, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

9 comments

  • ken anthony

    Their behavior denotes their real mission… justify and spend a budget. Everything else is subordinate to that goal.

  • wayne

    ken– good stuff.

    Q: What percentage of the NASA budget is used for pure operating expenses?

  • Wayne asked, “What percentage of the NASA budget is used for pure operating expenses?”

    Too much.

  • wayne

    Yarrrrr. (That’s sorta what I thought.)

    But seriously– how much does it cost NASA to “turn the lights on” every day?
    How much of their (roughly) $20 billion/year budget, is available to actually spend on “stuff,” vs. all their fixed-costs and whatever else they do?

    Armageddon
    “You guys are NASA” scene
    https://youtu.be/_B7MzBmjaJ8
    (0:32)

  • Wayne: Someone would need to do a very detailed and careful analysis to answer your question. It has been done piecemeal for a variety of NASA departments, but as far as I know, no one has ever done it for the entire agency.

    My own rough guess would be that NASA spends about 60% for overhead.

  • wayne

    Thanks Mr. Z.

    I don’t expect NASA to run at a “profit” per-se, but 60% for overhead, is way too much.
    (and I realize “government-accounting” is its own specialty, and they have historically built a lot of one-off infrastructure.)

    I’ll do some digging myself into some of this…just thinking out loud.

    How much does a SpaceX , pay the government, to utilize government-owned infrastructure & services, for any given rocket launch? (I’m thinking ground-support & tracking

  • Edward

    Part of the difficulty in figuring out the overhead costs is determining just what is meant by the word.

    I have worked for companies that charged the government only for the people who worked directly on a project, and the secretaries, payroll, and other support staff were considered overhead. Thus the charge to the government customer was significantly more than my pay.

    I had a university customer, once (actually, it was the customer of the company I worked for), whose customer was the government, and at the university, everyone involved was directly charged to the government customer, including secretaries, etc. Thus the overhead charge was much less than charged by the company that I worked for at that time.

    With my limited experience in what is meant by overhead, I will agree with Robert’s guess of 60%, if various support staff are considered overhead, but I will guess that it is only half that, if facility construction, maintenance, lighting, etc. is what is considered overhead.

    I suspect that the long-time government-vendor companies (e.g. the famed military-industrial complex, and NASA and its vendors) use the first model in order to get along with each other’s accounting and auditing departments, but that universities tend to use the latter model, in order to look cheaper.

  • wodun

    @ Wayne

    Good question. I am not sure what government resources SpaceX uses on any given launch. Surely there are some. I did some brief googling and it was hard to find any information. There is probably something out there, either in the press or in an interview, at least what resources are used if not their costs.

    On Wikipedia and other sites that talked about SpaceX leasing NASA facilities, the price was never mentioned. It sounds like the lease allows SpaceX to maintain the launch sites and make renovations/improvements. But who knows what they pay NASA for the privilege? There are probably numbers out there someplace.

  • Vladislaw

    NASA space side gets about half the 20 billion? Aeronautics the the other half?

    10 NASA centers? One NASA insider once posted that the shuttle workforce cost almost 200 million a month. 2.4 billion if it flew or not…

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *