<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Biggest black hole merger yet detected by gravitational waves	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/biggest-black-hole-merger-yet-detected-by-gravitational-waves/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/biggest-black-hole-merger-yet-detected-by-gravitational-waves/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:28:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: wayne		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/biggest-black-hole-merger-yet-detected-by-gravitational-waves/#comment-1087786</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2020 12:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=68924#comment-1087786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is very informative, although way too short-&#062;

Stan Woosley: 
&quot;Pair-Instability Supernovae&quot;
Sackler Conference 2016 
 https://youtu.be/0seHmcpg3gY
34:01]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very informative, although way too short-&gt;</p>
<p>Stan Woosley:<br />
&#8220;Pair-Instability Supernovae&#8221;<br />
Sackler Conference 2016<br />
 <a href="https://youtu.be/0seHmcpg3gY" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/0seHmcpg3gY</a><br />
34:01</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: wayne		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/biggest-black-hole-merger-yet-detected-by-gravitational-waves/#comment-1087668</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wayne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 11:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=68924#comment-1087668</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Pair Instability Supernova&quot;
Anton Petrov  -&#062;August 2019
https://youtu.be/WqDI4ojw-94
11:08]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pair Instability Supernova&#8221;<br />
Anton Petrov  -&gt;August 2019<br />
<a href="https://youtu.be/WqDI4ojw-94" rel="nofollow ugc">https://youtu.be/WqDI4ojw-94</a><br />
11:08</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Max		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/biggest-black-hole-merger-yet-detected-by-gravitational-waves/#comment-1087654</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Max]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2020 03:15:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=68924#comment-1087654</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The uncertainty of science: 

&quot;The signal, resembling about four short wiggles, is extremely brief in duration, lasting less than one-tenth of a second. From what the researchers can tell, GW190521 was generated by a source that is roughly 5 gigaparsecs away, when the universe was about half its age, making it one of the most distant gravitational-wave sources detected so far.&quot;

“This doesn’t look much like a chirp, which is what we typically detect,” says Virgo member Nelson Christensen, a researcher at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), comparing the signal to LIGO’s first detection of gravitational waves in 2015. “This is more like something that goes ‘bang,’ and it’s the most massive signal LIGO and Virgo have seen.”

&quot;But what if something entirely new produced these gravitational waves? It’s a tantalizing prospect, and in their paper the scientists briefly consider other sources in the universe that might have produced the signal they detected. For instance, perhaps the gravitational waves were emitted by a collapsing star in our galaxy. The signal could also be from a cosmic string produced just after the universe inflated in its earliest moments — although neither of these exotic possibilities matches the data as well as a binary merger.&quot;
  https://www.ligo.org/detections/GW190521/files/pr-english.pdf]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The uncertainty of science: </p>
<p>&#8220;The signal, resembling about four short wiggles, is extremely brief in duration, lasting less than one-tenth of a second. From what the researchers can tell, GW190521 was generated by a source that is roughly 5 gigaparsecs away, when the universe was about half its age, making it one of the most distant gravitational-wave sources detected so far.&#8221;</p>
<p>“This doesn’t look much like a chirp, which is what we typically detect,” says Virgo member Nelson Christensen, a researcher at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS), comparing the signal to LIGO’s first detection of gravitational waves in 2015. “This is more like something that goes ‘bang,’ and it’s the most massive signal LIGO and Virgo have seen.”</p>
<p>&#8220;But what if something entirely new produced these gravitational waves? It’s a tantalizing prospect, and in their paper the scientists briefly consider other sources in the universe that might have produced the signal they detected. For instance, perhaps the gravitational waves were emitted by a collapsing star in our galaxy. The signal could also be from a cosmic string produced just after the universe inflated in its earliest moments — although neither of these exotic possibilities matches the data as well as a binary merger.&#8221;<br />
  <a href="https://www.ligo.org/detections/GW190521/files/pr-english.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.ligo.org/detections/GW190521/files/pr-english.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
