<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: California&#8217;s Coastal Commission again rejects an increase in SpaceX&#8217;s launch rate at Vandenberg	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 06:11:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Blair Ivey		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1619072</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blair Ivey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2025 06:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=116357#comment-1619072</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was curious if there was a reason for the various design elements in the CCC logo, especially as it appears to depict a tri-sectioned tsunami evocative of Katsushika Hokusai&#039;s &#039;Great Wave&#039; print. Perhaps the three sections represent Complain-Coerce-Confiscate. The main element seems counterintuitive, as a &#039;Great Wave&#039; would (will) wipe out in seconds what the CCC spent decades regulating. 

As for design, there doesn&#039;t seem to be any specific intent outside &#039;There&#039;s water at the coast, let&#039;s use a wave.&#039; They couldn&#039;t show, like, some coast? I suspect someone saw the print, thought it was cool, and went with it. I hope the logo was sketched by a junior employee, and not something the CCC used taxpayer dollars to . . . yeah.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was curious if there was a reason for the various design elements in the CCC logo, especially as it appears to depict a tri-sectioned tsunami evocative of Katsushika Hokusai&#8217;s &#8216;Great Wave&#8217; print. Perhaps the three sections represent Complain-Coerce-Confiscate. The main element seems counterintuitive, as a &#8216;Great Wave&#8217; would (will) wipe out in seconds what the CCC spent decades regulating. </p>
<p>As for design, there doesn&#8217;t seem to be any specific intent outside &#8216;There&#8217;s water at the coast, let&#8217;s use a wave.&#8217; They couldn&#8217;t show, like, some coast? I suspect someone saw the print, thought it was cool, and went with it. I hope the logo was sketched by a junior employee, and not something the CCC used taxpayer dollars to . . . yeah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Wright		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618910</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=116357#comment-1618910</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Legal animism is the big threat now

https://www.space.com/astronomy/earth/how-the-nature-of-environmental-law-is-changing-in-defense-of-the-planet-and-the-climate

Chilling
https://phys.org/news/2025-08-global-sovereign-states-legally-responsible.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legal animism is the big threat now</p>
<p><a href="https://www.space.com/astronomy/earth/how-the-nature-of-environmental-law-is-changing-in-defense-of-the-planet-and-the-climate" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.space.com/astronomy/earth/how-the-nature-of-environmental-law-is-changing-in-defense-of-the-planet-and-the-climate</a></p>
<p>Chilling<br />
<a href="https://phys.org/news/2025-08-global-sovereign-states-legally-responsible.html" rel="nofollow ugc">https://phys.org/news/2025-08-global-sovereign-states-legally-responsible.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dick Eagleson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618831</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2025 17:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=116357#comment-1618831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Edward,

If the Coastal Commission staff are actually waiting on information from the &quot;Air Force,&quot; they&#039;ll have a long wait.  USAF doesn&#039;t run Vandy anymore, the Space Force does.  And, yes, the Space Force is technically a part of the Air Force in the same way the Marine Corps is part of the Navy, but the Coastal Commission wouldn&#039;t be asking the Navy about things that go on at Camp Pendleton.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward,</p>
<p>If the Coastal Commission staff are actually waiting on information from the &#8220;Air Force,&#8221; they&#8217;ll have a long wait.  USAF doesn&#8217;t run Vandy anymore, the Space Force does.  And, yes, the Space Force is technically a part of the Air Force in the same way the Marine Corps is part of the Navy, but the Coastal Commission wouldn&#8217;t be asking the Navy about things that go on at Camp Pendleton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Wright		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2025 03:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=116357#comment-1618546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To Cotour.

Calling today&#039;s Californians socialists/communists is a slap in the face of Cosmonauts, Chief Designers and MiG pilots who at least loved their country and embraced hardship and suffering in the name of cosmism and futurism.

These vegan HOA housewives and their ilk are the worst of humanity. 

Where revolutionaries announced their presence with the honest bark of the Kalashnikov--these worms want to smother exceptionalism with pillows and poisons.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Cotour.</p>
<p>Calling today&#8217;s Californians socialists/communists is a slap in the face of Cosmonauts, Chief Designers and MiG pilots who at least loved their country and embraced hardship and suffering in the name of cosmism and futurism.</p>
<p>These vegan HOA housewives and their ilk are the worst of humanity. </p>
<p>Where revolutionaries announced their presence with the honest bark of the Kalashnikov&#8211;these worms want to smother exceptionalism with pillows and poisons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Van Dune		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618474</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Van Dune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 23:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=116357#comment-1618474</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My above comment was only half joking, since I am sure the USSF does indeed have a preemptive launch option for priority military payloads, not (unfortunately) flatulent gasbags.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My above comment was only half joking, since I am sure the USSF does indeed have a preemptive launch option for priority military payloads, not (unfortunately) flatulent gasbags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618466</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 23:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=116357#comment-1618466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robert, 
You clearly missed the important part of the article, the part that gives the empirical evidence that SpaceX is bad for the California Coast: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;A staff report emphasized that SpaceX now “owns significantly more satellites than the combined total owned by every country and every other company in the world,” supporting the company’s recent $400-billion valuation.&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

It is the number of satellites owned by a single company that is the problem with the coast.  If there were fewer satellites owned by SpaceX, then the coastal environment would be ever so clean and quiet.  Instead, SpaceX owns and operates more satellites than the rest of the world combined, and that is a clear problem for the spotted owl -- I mean -- the plover bird.  Or maybe it is the seagulls, or the salmon.  It doesn&#039;t really matter, it is an obvious, self-evident problem, and nature would be so much better off if someone else owned all those satellites.  

Or maybe it is the high valuation of the company that is harming the environment.  If only SpaceX were worth less (or were worthless), then everything would be alright for the poor, harassed otters. 

Wait, wait.  Breaking news!  The last paragraph in the article: 
&lt;blockquote&gt;Commission staff concluded that the Air Force “has not provided sufficient information to enable the Commission to determine that the proposed project is consistent with the enforceable policies of the California Coastal Management Program.”&lt;/blockquote&gt; 

Doesn&#039;t this mean that the commission does not have any information to conclude that the project is &lt;em&gt;inconsistent &lt;/em&gt;with the enforceable policies of the CCMP?  If they did have that kind of information, then they would not need the information from the Air Force.  

So, really, this is not about SpaceX, it is about the Air Force.  The Air Force did not provide what the commission wanted.  

As one of my mentors taught me, read the end of an article (or annual report), because you can learn some interesting things there, at the end.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert,<br />
You clearly missed the important part of the article, the part that gives the empirical evidence that SpaceX is bad for the California Coast: </p>
<blockquote><p>A staff report emphasized that SpaceX now “owns significantly more satellites than the combined total owned by every country and every other company in the world,” supporting the company’s recent $400-billion valuation.</p></blockquote>
<p>It is the number of satellites owned by a single company that is the problem with the coast.  If there were fewer satellites owned by SpaceX, then the coastal environment would be ever so clean and quiet.  Instead, SpaceX owns and operates more satellites than the rest of the world combined, and that is a clear problem for the spotted owl &#8212; I mean &#8212; the plover bird.  Or maybe it is the seagulls, or the salmon.  It doesn&#8217;t really matter, it is an obvious, self-evident problem, and nature would be so much better off if someone else owned all those satellites.  </p>
<p>Or maybe it is the high valuation of the company that is harming the environment.  If only SpaceX were worth less (or were worthless), then everything would be alright for the poor, harassed otters. </p>
<p>Wait, wait.  Breaking news!  The last paragraph in the article: </p>
<blockquote><p>Commission staff concluded that the Air Force “has not provided sufficient information to enable the Commission to determine that the proposed project is consistent with the enforceable policies of the California Coastal Management Program.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t this mean that the commission does not have any information to conclude that the project is <em>inconsistent </em>with the enforceable policies of the CCMP?  If they did have that kind of information, then they would not need the information from the Air Force.  </p>
<p>So, really, this is not about SpaceX, it is about the Air Force.  The Air Force did not provide what the commission wanted.  </p>
<p>As one of my mentors taught me, read the end of an article (or annual report), because you can learn some interesting things there, at the end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Zimmerman		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618395</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Zimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 18:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=116357#comment-1618395</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618387&quot;&gt;Steve White&lt;/a&gt;.

Steve White: More precisely, the commission has no authority over what the Space Force decides to do at Vandenberg. The commission however has a great deal of authority -- all authoritarian -- over state and privately held coastal sites. If you own beachfront, the commission will have its hand in your wallet, and its regulators on your back, and it can hurt you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618387">Steve White</a>.</p>
<p>Steve White: More precisely, the commission has no authority over what the Space Force decides to do at Vandenberg. The commission however has a great deal of authority &#8212; all authoritarian &#8212; over state and privately held coastal sites. If you own beachfront, the commission will have its hand in your wallet, and its regulators on your back, and it can hurt you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve White		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618387</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve White]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 18:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=116357#comment-1618387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No one is required to listen to the California Coastal Commission, right?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one is required to listen to the California Coastal Commission, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cotour		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618382</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cotour]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 18:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=116357#comment-1618382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Did you say Communism?

DEMOCRAT, DEMOCRAT / SOCIALIST, SOCIALIST, COMMUNIST

What today do politically active and radical Democrats, Democrat / Socialists, Socialists and Communists in America all have in common?

What ALL of the politically active and radical above seek is to control what you can say, see, think and freely do because ALL Democrat associated politics today is some degree of aspirational authoritarian Socialism which must as a matter of course result in Communism. 

All in the pursuit of permanent political power and control. And that becomes clearer and clearer as the Democrats under increasing pressure are forced to reveal themselves and their agenda to the American people.

One of the above ideologies is just one degree from the other and they ALL exist on a slippery slope of political power acquisition.

A &quot;progressive&quot; Democrat will call themselves a Democrat / Socialist in order to distinguish themselves from the main body of the Democrat party which they rightly see as a liability. And they have modified their nomenclature in order to lessen your American natural Un comfortability with the term SOCIALISM. Many &quot;progressives&quot; through their &quot;higher&quot; education and indoctrination have developed a disdain for the founding of America and the existence of Capitalism. They have counter intuitively and intellectually developed a disdain for both America as it was founded, and Capitalism. The two things that every good thing in their lives sits upon and has allowed them their freedom of opinions based on their self-diagnosed moral and ideological superiority.

And where can we see this distinction between what some Democrats schizophrenically call themselves being revealed today? 

What does former Democrat party President, Barak Hussein Obama have to say about a self-identified Democrat / Socialist who talks very much like a Marxist and a Communist, Zohran Mamdani the Democrat party nominee for mayor of New York City:

https://dailycaller.com/2025/08/14/barack-obama-zohran-mamdani-socialist-democratic-party-democrats-embrace-radicals-far-left-shift/

Former President Barack Obama reportedly phoned New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, following Mamdani’s primary victory.

&quot;Democrats have a choice. “Put the woke away,” or put it front and center. If Obama publicly embraces Mamdani, it will be hard to read as anything but a hard swing towards the latter. &quot;

Obama advisor, David Axelrod: “What I found when I went over to that office was a familiar spirit that I hadn’t seen in a while of just determined, upbeat idealism,” Mr. Axelrod reportedly told the outlet. “You may not agree with every answer he’s giving, or every idea he has, but he’s certainly asking the right questions, which is how do we make the country work for working people?” 

He’s also asking questions like, &quot;How do we make life worse for white people?&quot; and &quot;How do we make life worse for smart people?&quot;

And what is the key in American Democrat, Democrat / Socialist, Socialist and Communist politics? Promote ignorance, racism, hatred and chaos, because that is exactly what they are all about. I can detect nothing other.

The Democrat party leadership need you to be full of hate and ignorance in order to further acquire and retain their political power. And the false promise of Socialism is their vehicle.

Are You Paying Attention Yet America?  JGL  8/15/25

https://www.sigma3ioc.com/post/democrat-democrat-socialist-socialist-communist]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you say Communism?</p>
<p>DEMOCRAT, DEMOCRAT / SOCIALIST, SOCIALIST, COMMUNIST</p>
<p>What today do politically active and radical Democrats, Democrat / Socialists, Socialists and Communists in America all have in common?</p>
<p>What ALL of the politically active and radical above seek is to control what you can say, see, think and freely do because ALL Democrat associated politics today is some degree of aspirational authoritarian Socialism which must as a matter of course result in Communism. </p>
<p>All in the pursuit of permanent political power and control. And that becomes clearer and clearer as the Democrats under increasing pressure are forced to reveal themselves and their agenda to the American people.</p>
<p>One of the above ideologies is just one degree from the other and they ALL exist on a slippery slope of political power acquisition.</p>
<p>A &#8220;progressive&#8221; Democrat will call themselves a Democrat / Socialist in order to distinguish themselves from the main body of the Democrat party which they rightly see as a liability. And they have modified their nomenclature in order to lessen your American natural Un comfortability with the term SOCIALISM. Many &#8220;progressives&#8221; through their &#8220;higher&#8221; education and indoctrination have developed a disdain for the founding of America and the existence of Capitalism. They have counter intuitively and intellectually developed a disdain for both America as it was founded, and Capitalism. The two things that every good thing in their lives sits upon and has allowed them their freedom of opinions based on their self-diagnosed moral and ideological superiority.</p>
<p>And where can we see this distinction between what some Democrats schizophrenically call themselves being revealed today? </p>
<p>What does former Democrat party President, Barak Hussein Obama have to say about a self-identified Democrat / Socialist who talks very much like a Marxist and a Communist, Zohran Mamdani the Democrat party nominee for mayor of New York City:</p>
<p><a href="https://dailycaller.com/2025/08/14/barack-obama-zohran-mamdani-socialist-democratic-party-democrats-embrace-radicals-far-left-shift/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://dailycaller.com/2025/08/14/barack-obama-zohran-mamdani-socialist-democratic-party-democrats-embrace-radicals-far-left-shift/</a></p>
<p>Former President Barack Obama reportedly phoned New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, a democratic socialist, following Mamdani’s primary victory.</p>
<p>&#8220;Democrats have a choice. “Put the woke away,” or put it front and center. If Obama publicly embraces Mamdani, it will be hard to read as anything but a hard swing towards the latter. &#8221;</p>
<p>Obama advisor, David Axelrod: “What I found when I went over to that office was a familiar spirit that I hadn’t seen in a while of just determined, upbeat idealism,” Mr. Axelrod reportedly told the outlet. “You may not agree with every answer he’s giving, or every idea he has, but he’s certainly asking the right questions, which is how do we make the country work for working people?” </p>
<p>He’s also asking questions like, &#8220;How do we make life worse for white people?&#8221; and &#8220;How do we make life worse for smart people?&#8221;</p>
<p>And what is the key in American Democrat, Democrat / Socialist, Socialist and Communist politics? Promote ignorance, racism, hatred and chaos, because that is exactly what they are all about. I can detect nothing other.</p>
<p>The Democrat party leadership need you to be full of hate and ignorance in order to further acquire and retain their political power. And the false promise of Socialism is their vehicle.</p>
<p>Are You Paying Attention Yet America?  JGL  8/15/25</p>
<p><a href="https://www.sigma3ioc.com/post/democrat-democrat-socialist-socialist-communist" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.sigma3ioc.com/post/democrat-democrat-socialist-socialist-communist</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Zimmerman		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618379</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Zimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 18:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=116357#comment-1618379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618375&quot;&gt;Ray Van Dune&lt;/a&gt;.

Ray Van Dune: That&#039;s quite funny. Almost spilled my lunch all over myself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618375">Ray Van Dune</a>.</p>
<p>Ray Van Dune: That&#8217;s quite funny. Almost spilled my lunch all over myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Van Dune		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/californias-coastal-commission-again-rejects-an-increase-in-spacexs-launch-rate-at-vandenberg/#comment-1618375</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Van Dune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 18:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=116357#comment-1618375</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think it is likely that the USSF has some rights of preemption as part of its agreement with SpaceX. That means it can bump a SpaceX payload for one of its own if it needs to get something into orbit RIGHT NOW. A higher launch cadence makes that ability more valuable and usable.

For example, say the USSF hypothetically wanted to place the entire California Coastal Commission into orbit RIGHT NOW, so that they could oversee the coast better... Elon would no doubt be the patriot he is and say &quot;Yes sir - how high sir?!&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is likely that the USSF has some rights of preemption as part of its agreement with SpaceX. That means it can bump a SpaceX payload for one of its own if it needs to get something into orbit RIGHT NOW. A higher launch cadence makes that ability more valuable and usable.</p>
<p>For example, say the USSF hypothetically wanted to place the entire California Coastal Commission into orbit RIGHT NOW, so that they could oversee the coast better&#8230; Elon would no doubt be the patriot he is and say &#8220;Yes sir &#8211; how high sir?!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
