<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Chang&#8217;e-4 launch set for December	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/change-4-launch-set-for-december/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/change-4-launch-set-for-december/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 06:23:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Localfluff		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/change-4-launch-set-for-december/#comment-1054589</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Localfluff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jun 2018 06:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=52201#comment-1054589</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Especially the ground penetrating radar on the rover will be great, if it rolls much further this time than last time.

To land at a pole, I would think that a s.k. Molniya orbit is preferred for a communications relay satellite. I.e. simply a highly eccentric polar orbit with apoapsis above the surface lander so that it only briefly disappears out of line of sight. The Chinese are using a halo orbit instead, which is great for the far side but not for the poles. But China clearly is the world leader in Moon exploration now. With LOP-G NASA has demonstrated that they don&#039;t have any interest in the Moon whatsoever. NASA&#039;s goal is literally to never ever land on the Moon. They are ashamed of the Apollo project or something.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Especially the ground penetrating radar on the rover will be great, if it rolls much further this time than last time.</p>
<p>To land at a pole, I would think that a s.k. Molniya orbit is preferred for a communications relay satellite. I.e. simply a highly eccentric polar orbit with apoapsis above the surface lander so that it only briefly disappears out of line of sight. The Chinese are using a halo orbit instead, which is great for the far side but not for the poles. But China clearly is the world leader in Moon exploration now. With LOP-G NASA has demonstrated that they don&#8217;t have any interest in the Moon whatsoever. NASA&#8217;s goal is literally to never ever land on the Moon. They are ashamed of the Apollo project or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
