<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Chicago police must pay 330k for killing dog in home raid	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/chicago-police-must-pay-330k-for-killing-dog-in-home-raid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/chicago-police-must-pay-330k-for-killing-dog-in-home-raid/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:45:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Federalist		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/chicago-police-must-pay-330k-for-killing-dog-in-home-raid/#comment-24713</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Federalist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=11352#comment-24713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think a study needs to be made comparing 1.) the loss of evidence due to lack of no-knock raids and the dangers from sieges that may result from that lack of a no-knock entry to 2) the dangers that result from using no-knock entries. My guess is that empirical evidence will have long ago swung decisively against the no-knock. 

This survey would be above and beyond whatever corrosive effects increased use of no-knocks has on the mentality of police, as well as the implied relationship between citizen and government.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a study needs to be made comparing 1.) the loss of evidence due to lack of no-knock raids and the dangers from sieges that may result from that lack of a no-knock entry to 2) the dangers that result from using no-knock entries. My guess is that empirical evidence will have long ago swung decisively against the no-knock. </p>
<p>This survey would be above and beyond whatever corrosive effects increased use of no-knocks has on the mentality of police, as well as the implied relationship between citizen and government.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DDZ		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/chicago-police-must-pay-330k-for-killing-dog-in-home-raid/#comment-24662</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DDZ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=11352#comment-24662</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s about time that the courts punished the police for breaking into innocent people&#039;s homes and killing their pet dogs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s about time that the courts punished the police for breaking into innocent people&#8217;s homes and killing their pet dogs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
