Comments on: China commits to building its own SLS

By: wayne

wayne — Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:37:50 +0000

the sound-track to the annihilation strike:

U2
“Seconds”
https://youtu.be/XSl0W-NsL98
3:10

By: Jeff Wright

Jeff Wright — Fri, 26 Feb 2021 09:27:49 +0000

In China, space isn’t a red headed step-child. Here in the US, anti-military types, cost-cutting budget hawks and other branches of the service -who know rods from god make carriers and bombers obsolete-they all gang up on you. That’s why I’m so touchy on the subject of space.

By: bkivey

bkivey — Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:13:50 +0000

pzatchok noted: “The problem with NASA and many engineers in the US is that they over work a problem.”

How many times have I told an intern “Don’t overthink the problem.” Get to a robust, workable solution, and leave it alone.

By: Jeff Wright

Jeff Wright — Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:35:54 +0000

Something else- Earth is the US, Britain is Vulcan, NATO is the Fed, Russians are the Klingons-ESA is Romulus-and China is the Borg.

By: Jeff Wright

Jeff Wright — Fri, 26 Feb 2021 07:20:08 +0000

I seem to remember hearing that the Concorde plans were doctored with a Rogue One type flaw that led to the crash. But they came up with good rockets because they had no fear of size. While we were trying to shave off every ounce-they made the rockets bigger. China agrees. Reusability is not the same as sustainability. If China wants the Moon badly enough they aren’t above throwing five away-to fall atop the heads of their own subjects-to get one to Luna. We all know how the Great Wall was built. Still, it’s their easily siloed solids that are most concerning. Russia was about oppresion from above. In China-it is about orderliness…stability before justice…the nail that stands out will be hammered down. Culture allowed them to separate Glastnost from Perestroika where the rowdy Russians failed. The Long View. No talk of a ground zero mosque there-no Londonistan-no gangsta’ thugs running the schoolhouse-get the math question right-and we won’t cane you. I must give them that much.

By: pzatchok

pzatchok — Fri, 26 Feb 2021 04:44:23 +0000

I have always admired the Russian ability to copy and modify a design to make something workable.
But advancement and innovation are not their forte.

The problem with NASA and many engineers in the US is that they over work a problem. For the SLS instead of dropping back on old proven tech and just redesigning a main air-frame and using the old tanks and engines they got talked into using all new cutting edge manufacturing techniques at HUGE costs. Just to save a little weight.
On budget, on time and usable are not their goals.

By: Lee Stevenson

Lee Stevenson — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:39:10 +0000

All the funnies are very funny, but the US would be very complacent to disregard China in the current space race. They have advantages over the US in many ways right now…. Stolen access to all your stuff, a genuine long term plan that isn’t going to change every 4 years, and a seemingly genuine urge to become a dominant force in exploration of space. There is no doubt that they have become a real player in the game in a short amount of time. The Chinese government obviously has a plan, and while I wish any and everyone good luck in space exploration, and I can only agree that capitalism has driven massive advance in space technology in the last decades, it would be foolish to discount China….

By: jhonB

jhonB — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 22:21:47 +0000

Let’s hope they did steal this from NASA, they can blow billions and billions over the next 15 years and never get off the ground.

By: Andi

Andi — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 21:11:40 +0000

They’ve had more practice. Isn’t that what the lefties keep saying here – that we just haven’t tried it long enough.?

Course there is that small matter of tens of millions of deaths…

By: LocalFluff

LocalFluff — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:47:57 +0000

The Chinese build cities uninhabited and railroads to nowhere. And dams crashing. They could an SLS that either never flies, or blows up, they have a proven record of both.

I’ve repeated this several times. NASA, or anyone thrifty, should’ve bought or made a consortium with Roscosmos in the early 1990s to use their successful Energia launcher. The working SLS 30 years before the SLS. Thirty years. Russians are much much better at socialism than the Americans.

By: Blair K Ivey

Blair K Ivey — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:59:12 +0000

“China commits to building its own SLS”

Hey, we’ve got one we’re looking to get rid of, and the Chinese want one. Deal?

By: LocalFluff

LocalFluff — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:31:51 +0000

Here’s a clip of a FANTASTIC take off by the Tu-144!!! I went vertical before the runway ends.
And its crash on the Paris air show in 1973.
https://youtu.be/bEIAMM13RFQ?t=29

By: LocalFluff

LocalFluff — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:20:59 +0000

Perhaps it is counter infiltration? Nah, the Soviets used espionage on the Concorde super sonic passenger aircraft in the 1960s to build the Tupolev 144. After having crashed a few times, and always only carrying top party members, it was discontinued as a passenger aircraft.

Problems with the espionage of the Soviets were that they used non-inch standards on their tools. And otherwise had different standards. So they had to make the aluminium hull plates thicker, and smaller, and that affected the mass and aerodynamics. Together with the different characteristics of the engines, then the wings and nose had to be redesigned. And so on. It was a look-alike aircraft, but it performed differently. And not so good. Copying blueprints wasn’t so easy.

I’m sure it is much easier for China today since all they know is what Western industries have given them. But this obviously isn’t an SLS copy anyway. China socialists are wise enough to know to not believe their own propaganda lies, and do what works instead. Socialism is royalty. Emperor Xi Jinping has “cancelled” Winnie the Pooh, but not useful industry practices.

By: MDN

MDN — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:23:28 +0000

Sadly our greatest challenge is not to establish and protect civil liberties and the rule of law in outer space, it is simply to preserve it here on Earth. May God help us so so.

By: Ray Van Dune

Ray Van Dune — Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:33:14 +0000

They’ve obviously been tapping Sen. Shelby’s phone. Maybe we can help them steal Boeing’s Starliner software too!

But seriously, I’d like to suggest we need a debate about the value or wisdom of international cooperation in space going forward, especially in respect to China and Russia. The EU may be capable of making a net positive contribution, but the other two I think simply represent a risk of espionage, and even worse of the western world helping to propagate international communism and terrorism to other worlds! That’s how I see it… “change my mind!”