<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: China considers moves against North Korea	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/china-considers-moves-against-north-korea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/china-considers-moves-against-north-korea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2016 20:26:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: pzatchok		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/china-considers-moves-against-north-korea/#comment-935615</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pzatchok]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2016 20:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=42120#comment-935615</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot; Dave Williams	
October 9, 2016 at 2:11 am

Probably a red herring (pun intended). The Peoples Liberation Army helped facilitate the N. Korean nuclear program. Any time they want regime change in N. Korea all they need do is cut off food, oil, and electricity, and give the N. Korean generals the go ahead. Little Kim Jong Un would be toast.&quot;



After NK has working nuclear weapons and a delivery system with holding food will not be an option.

Even China does not want to lose a million people plus a million solders if NK launches. Do you really think the NK government or military will tell their own brain washed people they were the ones to start the war?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Dave Williams<br />
October 9, 2016 at 2:11 am</p>
<p>Probably a red herring (pun intended). The Peoples Liberation Army helped facilitate the N. Korean nuclear program. Any time they want regime change in N. Korea all they need do is cut off food, oil, and electricity, and give the N. Korean generals the go ahead. Little Kim Jong Un would be toast.&#8221;</p>
<p>After NK has working nuclear weapons and a delivery system with holding food will not be an option.</p>
<p>Even China does not want to lose a million people plus a million solders if NK launches. Do you really think the NK government or military will tell their own brain washed people they were the ones to start the war?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dave Williams		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/china-considers-moves-against-north-korea/#comment-935492</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2016 09:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=42120#comment-935492</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Probably a red herring (pun intended). The Peoples Liberation Army helped facilitate the N. Korean nuclear program. Any time they want regime change in N. Korea all they need do is cut off food, oil, and electricity, and give the N. Korean generals the go ahead. Little Kim Jong Un would be toast.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably a red herring (pun intended). The Peoples Liberation Army helped facilitate the N. Korean nuclear program. Any time they want regime change in N. Korea all they need do is cut off food, oil, and electricity, and give the N. Korean generals the go ahead. Little Kim Jong Un would be toast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: INSOMNiUS		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/china-considers-moves-against-north-korea/#comment-935359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[INSOMNiUS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2016 00:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=42120#comment-935359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Who could or would stop China from taking action to depose Kim? 
Russia? no way.  UN sanctions? not likely...
Besides, does anybody remember the axis of evil that George Bush Jr. pointed out around 2003?  Libya and Syria were not on that list. It&#039;s interesting that within the last few days, China has stated their support for both Syria and Russia with their military, while at the same time floating the idea of asking for assistance and cooperation from the US in dealing with North Korea on top of that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who could or would stop China from taking action to depose Kim?<br />
Russia? no way.  UN sanctions? not likely&#8230;<br />
Besides, does anybody remember the axis of evil that George Bush Jr. pointed out around 2003?  Libya and Syria were not on that list. It&#8217;s interesting that within the last few days, China has stated their support for both Syria and Russia with their military, while at the same time floating the idea of asking for assistance and cooperation from the US in dealing with North Korea on top of that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blair Ivey		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/china-considers-moves-against-north-korea/#comment-935140</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blair Ivey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2016 02:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=42120#comment-935140</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tom Billings:

I&#039;d considered your second point, and as you rightfully point out there are some serious concerns about Chinese muscle-flexing. My consideration is that American power has been much reduced the last decade, and we can&#039;t be everywhere at once policing everything. That&#039;s what Democrats do. It may be that we should be seeking strategic partners at this point. 

On the other hand, if North Korea demonstrates a consistent ability to hit the US, I&#039;d support military action.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Billings:</p>
<p>I&#8217;d considered your second point, and as you rightfully point out there are some serious concerns about Chinese muscle-flexing. My consideration is that American power has been much reduced the last decade, and we can&#8217;t be everywhere at once policing everything. That&#8217;s what Democrats do. It may be that we should be seeking strategic partners at this point. </p>
<p>On the other hand, if North Korea demonstrates a consistent ability to hit the US, I&#8217;d support military action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phill O		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/china-considers-moves-against-north-korea/#comment-935112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phill O]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 23:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=42120#comment-935112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Orion314	
October 7, 2016 at 3:45 pm

Skirt? Skirt? not in this debate, pant suits only……&quot;


Good one!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Orion314<br />
October 7, 2016 at 3:45 pm</p>
<p>Skirt? Skirt? not in this debate, pant suits only……&#8221;</p>
<p>Good one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Orion314		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/china-considers-moves-against-north-korea/#comment-935107</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Orion314]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 22:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=42120#comment-935107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Skirt? Skirt? not in this debate, pant suits only......
;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skirt? Skirt? not in this debate, pant suits only&#8230;&#8230;<br />
;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Phill O		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/china-considers-moves-against-north-korea/#comment-935097</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phill O]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 22:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=42120#comment-935097</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[‘Some Chinese scholars and policy makers began to talk about supporting “surgical strikes” and “decapitation” by the U.S. and South Korea as one policy option,’

This option also allows the Chinese to observe the power of the most recent developments in the US arsenal!

What will be the responses in the next presidential debate.  Bet they try to skirt the issue!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>‘Some Chinese scholars and policy makers began to talk about supporting “surgical strikes” and “decapitation” by the U.S. and South Korea as one policy option,’</p>
<p>This option also allows the Chinese to observe the power of the most recent developments in the US arsenal!</p>
<p>What will be the responses in the next presidential debate.  Bet they try to skirt the issue!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Billings		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/china-considers-moves-against-north-korea/#comment-935084</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Billings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 21:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=42120#comment-935084</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;China has spent enormous sums of American trade money building a military and they expect the US to do their dirty work? &quot;

Sure! Squeeze a little more from the US is always an option. One option. An option that does the least to abandon the &quot;closer than lips and teeth&quot; relationship that China and the DPRK have had, even including plausible deniability.

&quot;...if China wants to be a strategic player they need to take care of their own back yard.&quot;

Yes, but do *we* want them to be that, rather than appear to be that? Not if the next place they &quot;help&quot; with is when the next elected President in the Philippines swerves away from President Duterte&#039;s current romance with the PRC, and the PLA decides they can and should prevent Duterte&#039;s policies from being reversed. At the present moment, the wrangling over bits of rock and coral in the seas East of China is a good way to distract a Chinese population from the agency costs of the governmental and Party hierarchies. We don&#039;t really want the PLAN, the PLAF, The PLA, the Military Affairs Comittee, and the Politburo to decide that this is a good general foreign policy, starting in the DPRK and expanding from there.

The PLA got a bloody nose when they invaded Vietnam in the late 1970s. I vote for keeping that as their most recent &quot;strategic experience&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;China has spent enormous sums of American trade money building a military and they expect the US to do their dirty work? &#8221;</p>
<p>Sure! Squeeze a little more from the US is always an option. One option. An option that does the least to abandon the &#8220;closer than lips and teeth&#8221; relationship that China and the DPRK have had, even including plausible deniability.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;if China wants to be a strategic player they need to take care of their own back yard.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, but do *we* want them to be that, rather than appear to be that? Not if the next place they &#8220;help&#8221; with is when the next elected President in the Philippines swerves away from President Duterte&#8217;s current romance with the PRC, and the PLA decides they can and should prevent Duterte&#8217;s policies from being reversed. At the present moment, the wrangling over bits of rock and coral in the seas East of China is a good way to distract a Chinese population from the agency costs of the governmental and Party hierarchies. We don&#8217;t really want the PLAN, the PLAF, The PLA, the Military Affairs Comittee, and the Politburo to decide that this is a good general foreign policy, starting in the DPRK and expanding from there.</p>
<p>The PLA got a bloody nose when they invaded Vietnam in the late 1970s. I vote for keeping that as their most recent &#8220;strategic experience&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Blair Ivey		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/china-considers-moves-against-north-korea/#comment-935073</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blair Ivey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 20:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=42120#comment-935073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[‘Some Chinese scholars and policy makers began to talk about supporting “surgical strikes” and “decapitation” by the U.S. and South Korea as one policy option,’

What the hell?

China has spent enormous sums of American trade money building a military and they expect the US to do their dirty work? While a nuclear-capable North Korea is of concern to everyone, if China wants to be a strategic player they need to take care of their own back yard.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>‘Some Chinese scholars and policy makers began to talk about supporting “surgical strikes” and “decapitation” by the U.S. and South Korea as one policy option,’</p>
<p>What the hell?</p>
<p>China has spent enormous sums of American trade money building a military and they expect the US to do their dirty work? While a nuclear-capable North Korea is of concern to everyone, if China wants to be a strategic player they need to take care of their own back yard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
