To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers!

 

It is now July, time once again to celebrate the start of this webpage in 2010 with my annual July fund-raising campaign.

 

This year I celebrate the fifteenth anniversary since I began Behind the Black. During that time I have done more than 33,000 posts, mostly covering the global space industry and the related planetary and astronomical science that comes from it. Along the way I have also felt compelled as a free American citizen to regularly post my thoughts on the politics and culture of the time, partly because I think it is important for free Americans to do so, and partly because those politics and that culture have a direct impact on the future of our civilization and its on-going efforts to explore and eventually colonize the solar system.

 

You can’t understand one without understanding the other.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent independent analysis you don’t find elsewhere. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn’t influenced by donations by established companies or political movements. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:

 

4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


Coalition of space companies begs Congress to fund office designed to track satellites

A coalition of 450 space companies has now submitted letters to both the House and Senate begging Congress to not kill the funding for an office in NOAA created during the first Trump administration and designed to help manage satellite traffic in orbit.

A coalition of space industry associations representing hundreds of companies is urging Congress to reject Trump Administration plans to kill the nascent Traffic Coordination System for Space (TraCSS). Developed through NOAA’s Office of Space Commerce, TraCSS began beta testing last fall to provide data to civil and commercial satellite operators to avoid collisions. Just as the system is finally taking shape, it is targeted for elimination in the FY2026 budget request. The Senate Appropriations Committee takes up that proposal on Thursday when it marks up the Commerce-Justice-Science (CJS) bill that includes NOAA.

This new office was first conceived as a replacement for the tracking that the U.S. military has been doing since Sputnik was launched in 1957, information that it provides free to the industry. It appears Trump in his second administration has now concluded this new NOAA office is essentially redundant and therefore unnecessary.

The letters to the House [pdf] and Senate [pdf] urge Congress to reinstate the $65 million in spending for this NOAA office, but offer no suggestions on what to cut to fund this extra cost. Instead, like all such lobbying efforts, it expects Congress to simply print money to pay for the expense.

Meanwhile, it remains a valid question why this additional office is needed if the military has been doing the job quite successfully for the last three-quarters of a century. The letters argue this is a job better suited to a civil agency, but why? The military has to do it anyway for security reasons. Why waste money on a duplicate effort?

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. from any other book seller, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

5 comments

  • J Fincannon

    “The letters argue this is a job better suited to a civil agency, but why? The military has to do it anyway for security reasons. Why waste money on a duplicate effort?”

    Maybe because the military does not report some things. Like its own secret satellites.

    “Uncorrelated targets” are another bugaboo. They only report things they can trace back to when and who launched it. How many such “targets” are there? A lot.

    They used to list the radar cross-sectional area, no more starting a while back..

    Also, orbital position accuracy is limited for national security purposes.

  • J Fincannon: In other words, the military tracking system has all the information required. It seems to me a simple matter for the White House to establish policies that allow the military’s system to be used more effectively for commercial purposes without threatening military security.

    Moreover, are you suggesting the commercial system should be allowed to publish information about military classified satellites that might be useful to hostile foreign powers? This information is better controlled by the military.

  • J Fincannon

    Of course the military can limit the distribution of data to any extent they desire. But I am saying maybe this is why companies do not like it. It is sort of like the old GPS inaccuracy. Yes, GPS needed to be less accurate to avoid being misused by bad actors. Yes, orbits need to be less accurate to prevent the data from being misused to target satellites. But companies may feel they need this data to be accurate and complete. Will the military provide the accurate uncorrelated target data to companies? I do not know.

    Also, you seem to know about the military tracking to say it is successful. What data is this based on? My gut says the hardware is old and clunky and understaffed. That we have so many uncorrelated targets is a sign that there is not enough analysts. Without transparency (which normally is the price of doing things through the military) it is hard to understand the problems or limits.

  • Jeff Wright

    NORAD is doing a fine job.

    This is just another accu-weather deal there, a private firm said that they can do things cheaper but in reality couldn’t–it is just NOAA this time.

    Over at stormtrack.org is an individual who talks about how tornado warnings that should have been issued weren’t…Mike Smith at “Weather in the news.”

    He has some real horror stories.

  • Edward

    Robert asked: “The letters argue this is a job better suited to a civil agency, but why?

    Could it be that the military does not update the orbital elements (the numbers that describe a satellite’s orbit and position within that orbit) often enough for the companies to be able to accurately predict collisions? The military’s use of the orbital elements are not for collision avoidance but for information such as the general tracking of which satellite is which and when it can be expected to overfly sensitive areas.

    It is difficult to predict the position of an object in an elliptical orbit, and perturbations* do not help. Perturbations can be difficult to predict, making it much more difficult to predict a satellite in even a circular orbit. Timely updates to orbital elements help to predict the future location of satellites, reducing the unknowns of perturbations.

    Currently, satellites are considered collision risks when they come within a kilometers-large “keep away” zone (an oblong bubble). This may seem adequate, but the 2009 collision between Iridium 33 the dead Kosmos 2251 had not been predicted, suggesting that the method of collision avoidance needed updating for better accuracy. We do not want to risk going back to this inadequate method.
    ____________
    * In another thread, yesterday, I mentioned perturbations as being able to be used for an advantage, but there are still some perturbations, such as atmospheric drag, that make orbital prediction difficult.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *