<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Dark energy evidence found to be uncertain	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/dark-energy-evidence-found-to-be-uncertain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/dark-energy-evidence-found-to-be-uncertain/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:31:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: PeterF		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/dark-energy-evidence-found-to-be-uncertain/#comment-746036</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PeterF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2015 13:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=33878#comment-746036</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/dark-energy-evidence-found-to-be-uncertain/#comment-744564&quot;&gt;Steven Mackelprang&lt;/a&gt;.

Wait. What? The primary data that spawned the &quot;Big Bang Theory&quot; might be flawed? Say it ain&#039;t so! If that was true then just about every new observation made would cause an &quot;adjustment&quot; to the theory, or the data would have to be &quot;adjusted&quot; to fit the theory.
But I&#039;ve always been told that a consensus of 97% of scientists agree that the theory is a true model...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/dark-energy-evidence-found-to-be-uncertain/#comment-744564">Steven Mackelprang</a>.</p>
<p>Wait. What? The primary data that spawned the &#8220;Big Bang Theory&#8221; might be flawed? Say it ain&#8217;t so! If that was true then just about every new observation made would cause an &#8220;adjustment&#8221; to the theory, or the data would have to be &#8220;adjusted&#8221; to fit the theory.<br />
But I&#8217;ve always been told that a consensus of 97% of scientists agree that the theory is a true model&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: D.K. Williams		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/dark-energy-evidence-found-to-be-uncertain/#comment-744594</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D.K. Williams]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 03:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=33878#comment-744594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This illustrates that scientists too often treat educated guesses as facts. It occurs frequently in cosmology when much theorizing rests on assumptions about data.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This illustrates that scientists too often treat educated guesses as facts. It occurs frequently in cosmology when much theorizing rests on assumptions about data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Mackelprang		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/dark-energy-evidence-found-to-be-uncertain/#comment-744564</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Mackelprang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2015 00:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=33878#comment-744564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Halton Arp was dismissed by the maintstream, but he called into question our interpretation of red shift years ago, and documented the reasons why.  If our understanding of red shift is wrong, then all the assumptions of how old and how fast the universe is expanding are out the window.  His books are available and are very interesting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Halton Arp was dismissed by the maintstream, but he called into question our interpretation of red shift years ago, and documented the reasons why.  If our understanding of red shift is wrong, then all the assumptions of how old and how fast the universe is expanding are out the window.  His books are available and are very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mpthompson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/dark-energy-evidence-found-to-be-uncertain/#comment-744472</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mpthompson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2015 21:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=33878#comment-744472</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hmmm.  Good thing science isn&#039;t governed by consensus, eh?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  Good thing science isn&#8217;t governed by consensus, eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
