<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Data leaks from particle hunters raise questions about controlling scientific secrecy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/data-leaks-from-particle-hunters-raise-questions-about-controlling-scientific-secrecy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/data-leaks-from-particle-hunters-raise-questions-about-controlling-scientific-secrecy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 20:14:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Blair Ivey		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/data-leaks-from-particle-hunters-raise-questions-about-controlling-scientific-secrecy/#comment-18081</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blair Ivey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2011 20:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=8953#comment-18081</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If a scientist is working for DoD or a similar agency, I can understand the need and desire to keep research findings secret: accept the King&#039;s coin and all that. In the civilian sector I don&#039;t really see this as problem. If the leakers are wrong, then they look foolish. If theyr&#039;e right and leak good data, so what? Especially in the case of the LHD, it&#039;s not like someone is going to use a similar machine to claim primacy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a scientist is working for DoD or a similar agency, I can understand the need and desire to keep research findings secret: accept the King&#8217;s coin and all that. In the civilian sector I don&#8217;t really see this as problem. If the leakers are wrong, then they look foolish. If theyr&#8217;e right and leak good data, so what? Especially in the case of the LHD, it&#8217;s not like someone is going to use a similar machine to claim primacy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
