<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: December 31, 2024 Quick space links	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/december-31-2024-quick-space-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/december-31-2024-quick-space-links/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 16:10:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: pzatchok		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/december-31-2024-quick-space-links/#comment-1540699</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pzatchok]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 16:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=111142#comment-1540699</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Back ups are always good.

But think of it this way.
Starship is huge. Docking it to a smaller massed station could be a problem. Its reaction jets could actually push the station away instead of just slowing down the Starship.

Plus there will be far more customers for a smaller ship for the next decade. All of the smaller nations or anyone who wants to go to smaller stations could use the Falcon insted of waiting for a seat on the big rocket.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back ups are always good.</p>
<p>But think of it this way.<br />
Starship is huge. Docking it to a smaller massed station could be a problem. Its reaction jets could actually push the station away instead of just slowing down the Starship.</p>
<p>Plus there will be far more customers for a smaller ship for the next decade. All of the smaller nations or anyone who wants to go to smaller stations could use the Falcon insted of waiting for a seat on the big rocket.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ray Van Dune		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/december-31-2024-quick-space-links/#comment-1540688</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ray Van Dune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2025 15:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=111142#comment-1540688</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;SpaceX remember is hoping Starship will replace the capsules in the future. Why build more in that case?&quot;

I foresee an opportunity to accelerate the man-rating of Starship by ferrying crew to and from it via Dragon capsules, rather than launching or landing with crew aboard, but no escape system. This also has implications for the continued use of the proven Falcon 9.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;SpaceX remember is hoping Starship will replace the capsules in the future. Why build more in that case?&#8221;</p>
<p>I foresee an opportunity to accelerate the man-rating of Starship by ferrying crew to and from it via Dragon capsules, rather than launching or landing with crew aboard, but no escape system. This also has implications for the continued use of the proven Falcon 9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
