<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Dissecting the bad arguments on both sides of the climate debate.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/dissecting-the-bad-arguments-on-both-sides-of-the-climate-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/dissecting-the-bad-arguments-on-both-sides-of-the-climate-debate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:17:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Patrick Ritchie		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/dissecting-the-bad-arguments-on-both-sides-of-the-climate-debate/#comment-43383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick Ritchie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=15749#comment-43383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My favorite quote from the article:

&lt;blockquote cite=&quot;http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/climate_deniers_are_giving_us_skeptics_a_bad_name.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&#038;utm_medium=twitter&quot;&gt;
&quot;I have concluded that we can accomplish very little with convinced warmistas and probably even less with true deniers.  So we just make our measurements, perfect our theories, publish our work, and hope that in time the truth will out.&quot;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am very quickly reaching the same conclusion, having religious arguments is rarely productive. We need to fund the science to improve our understanding of our climate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite quote from the article:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/climate_deniers_are_giving_us_skeptics_a_bad_name.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter"><p>
&#8220;I have concluded that we can accomplish very little with convinced warmistas and probably even less with true deniers.  So we just make our measurements, perfect our theories, publish our work, and hope that in time the truth will out.&#8221;
</p></blockquote>
<p>I am very quickly reaching the same conclusion, having religious arguments is rarely productive. We need to fund the science to improve our understanding of our climate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Garry		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/dissecting-the-bad-arguments-on-both-sides-of-the-climate-debate/#comment-43321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Garry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=15749#comment-43321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s funny that the article ends with a quote from Paul Watson (&quot;It doesn&#039;t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true&quot;).  When I started reading the article it occurred to me that my reaction to warmistas is similar to my reaction to Whale Wars, starring the very same Paul Watson (in fairness, I should acknowledge that he eventually split with Greenpeace).

After watching several episodes of the show, I was so turned off by Watson and Company&#039;s reckless tactics, and above all their misplaced sense of moral superiority, that I found myself pulling for the whalers, even though I&#039;m not particularly pro-whaling and don&#039;t much care for the whalers&#039; hypocrisy; i.e., &quot;this is all for research.&quot;  

Similarly, I&#039;m very turned off by the warmistas&#039; reckless claims, and above all their misplaced sense of moral superiority, that in weaker moments I find myself readily swallowing the claims of the deniers.

As you keep reminding us, Bob, that&#039;s one of the most dangerous aspects of the warmistas crying wolf; nobody will believe them even if what they report is true.

Thanks for providing lots of articles on climate change that help keep us on the straight and narrow.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s funny that the article ends with a quote from Paul Watson (&#8220;It doesn&#8217;t matter what is true, it only matters what people believe is true&#8221;).  When I started reading the article it occurred to me that my reaction to warmistas is similar to my reaction to Whale Wars, starring the very same Paul Watson (in fairness, I should acknowledge that he eventually split with Greenpeace).</p>
<p>After watching several episodes of the show, I was so turned off by Watson and Company&#8217;s reckless tactics, and above all their misplaced sense of moral superiority, that I found myself pulling for the whalers, even though I&#8217;m not particularly pro-whaling and don&#8217;t much care for the whalers&#8217; hypocrisy; i.e., &#8220;this is all for research.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Similarly, I&#8217;m very turned off by the warmistas&#8217; reckless claims, and above all their misplaced sense of moral superiority, that in weaker moments I find myself readily swallowing the claims of the deniers.</p>
<p>As you keep reminding us, Bob, that&#8217;s one of the most dangerous aspects of the warmistas crying wolf; nobody will believe them even if what they report is true.</p>
<p>Thanks for providing lots of articles on climate change that help keep us on the straight and narrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
