This shows that when it comes to climate science, people are in a panic. But then again, when you lack good solid data to support the desired global action, what else is there to do?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKaQLYPf5hM#t=109

http://euanmearns.com/co2-the-view-from-space/

Would it not cost a lot less to buy the information from other satellites already in space?
http://blogs.edf.org/energyexchange/2017/10/17/innovative-satellite-launched-for-monitoring-global-methane-and-air-quality/

https://www.satelytics.com/resources/2017-infographic-detecting-methane-leaks-using-satellite-imagery-and-satelytics/

http://blogs.edf.org/energyexchange/2017/10/02/nasa-helped-locate-over-300-methane-hot-spots-across-california/

https://m.esa.int/Our_Activities/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Sentinel-5P/Tropomi

It would appear that they have their own agenda, they have a solution that needs a problem to solve.
Methane has no correlation with climate change or even weather change. At 1.8 ppm, it is one of the rarest gases in our atmosphere. It is 222 times less abundant than CO2. Four times less abundant than helium.
To make understanding of parts per million easier, think of $1 million dollars. That’s 100 stacks of $100 dollar bills, 100 bills high. Carbon dioxide, at 400 ppm, would be 4 bills off one stack… methane would be 1 dollar and .80 cents!
(by the way, cows cannot make methane, only anaerobic bacteria can. If cows did not eat hay and grass, the fields would die back in the winter and rot on the ground turning into methane anyway…)

It is impossible for methane to last very long in the presence of oxygen. It quickly oxidizes and turns into carbon dioxide and water. Anyone who has cooked on a gas stove is familiar with its properties. Your local natural gas company can give you accurate information on how long it takes for methane to disappear.
It has taken billions of years to reach 1.8 ppm, how many billions more will it take to reach 2 parts per million? The methane controversy is the pinnacle of junk science.

MarcusZ1967: Good catch. I am posting on the main page, giving you a hat tip.

I support the use of private funds to realize large projects, no matter the ideological bent. The process of convincing others to buy in to an idea empowers the individual, rather than transferring that power to the State. It’s the idea the United States was founded on, and we need more of it.

https://phys.org/news/2018-04-biologically-membrane-purges-coal-fired-greenhouse.html

Particularly, the last paragraph is very exciting.