Scroll down to read this post.

 

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. from any other book seller, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News


ExoMars2020 passes new parachute tests

Revisions to Europe’s ExoMars2020 parachutes have successfully passed tests at JPL in California.

Working with Nasa, ESA made modifications to the way the parachutes are released from the bag, which avoids creating so much friction. Using a special rig at JPL, the parachutes have now been tested up to their expected extraction speed of just over 200km/h with no sign of damage. Further confirmatory tests will now take place.

Time remains very short however. The launch window for ExoMars2020 is this coming summer.

The support of my readers through the years has given me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Four years ago, just before the 2020 election I wrote that Joe Biden's mental health was suspect. Only in the past two weeks has the mainstream media decided to recognize that basic fact.

 

Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Even today NASA and Congress refuses to recognize this reality.

 

In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.

 

Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation:

4. A Paypal subscription:


5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.

9 comments

  • Richard M

    Hope they can make it.

    I’d hate to see the Rosalind Franklin reduced to a pile of rubbish on the Martian landscape, given its amazing capabilities.

    Whereas I would love to see both it and Mars 2020 landing around the same time, and both sending back images and data every day.

  • Lee S

    I would like …. No…. Love, to see a successful landing of this massively capable, and to be honest, more adventurous than anything NASA has launched since the Viking missions regarding the search for life on Mars, to achieve a successful landing and mission…. But I am deeply skeptical…
    The ESA couldn’t get the parachutes right after almost 20 years (perhaps 15 years… But this mission has been in “development” for decades…) , We had to come and get some tips off NASA before passing the test… And this is just a couple of months before packing up the thing ready for launch.
    I’ve mentioned this before here, but I remember watching a TV program when Steve Squires went to have a look…. His advice was ” give it 6 wheel turning…. If we hadn’t had that on my 2 rovers, they would both be dead now..”… This was early in the development…. And entirely ignored.
    I wish this mission the very best of luck… I will watch the few minuets of terror live with a bottle of bubbly, as I do for every Mars mission… And pop the cork if it lands safely…. But given the rushing for this launch window, and the success rate for European landing on Mars…. I will also have a bottle of scotch ready for when contact gets lost and doesn’t resume….
    I wish I could be optimistic…. But I just can’t be … Too late in development, too fast in pretended everything is ready…
    I won’t eat my hat, but I will eat some form of horrible Swedish fish if this manages to land successfully!

  • Richard M

    “…more adventurous than anything NASA has launched since the Viking missions”

    I love the Rosalind Franklin and the scientific promise it brings, but…surely this is slightly excessive praise? It’s hard to say it’s more advernturous than Curiosity, but perhaps you have a different definition of the word than I do.

  • Lee S

    Sorry Richard… But you missed the “regarding the search for life on Mars ” bit of what I said…. The only mission to actively search for “life” on the red planet since was the bargain basement ESA Beagle 2, which came so close to working, but failed to deploy it’s solar panels.
    NASA has consistently refused to do a real search for extinct or extant life since the ambiguity of the Viking results.

  • Dick Eagleson

    Lee S,

    You are, lamentably, spot on anent NASA’s longstanding aversion to actively seeking martian life. And yet NASA still periodically trumpets various half-baked “indications” of its possible presence on Mars. It’s as though the agency fears it will be shut down if it definitively fails to find extraterrestrial life in this “most likely” place.

    As to a suitable sackcloth-and-ashes meal in the event of ExoMars’s possible failure, it’s too bad you don’t live one country over – you could have lutefisk.

  • Richard M

    Hello Lee,

    I think Curiosity/MSL deserves more credit on this front. Three of its eight key science objectives are, after all: Determine the nature and inventory of organic carbon compounds; Investigate the chemical building blocks of life (carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus, and sulfur); and Identify features that may represent the effects of biological processes (biosignatures and biomolecules).

    Of course, Mars 2020 is going to be even more astrobiology focused (not least in its choice of landing site).

    I’ll be honest: I do not think there is, or ever was, life on Mars of any sort. It’s worth looking anyway, to be sure, though I start to wonder about how much the search for life or life precursors is crowding out other Martian science.

  • Diane Wilson

    What NASA learned from Viking was that the question of life on Mars was more complicated than they knew at the time, and to be more circumspect about what they looked for, what they might find, and what those findings might mean. The “follow the water” strategy in recent decades has been both a search of possible sites for human use as well as for possible origins of life.

    I could consider the possibility of simple single-celled life during Mars’ warmer and wetter past, probably more like prokaryotes (no nucleus) than eukaryotes. I’m much less sanguine about anything still surviving, or any reliable and conclusive evidence.

  • Col Beausabre

    And what did the ESA pay NASA for the use of taxpayer funded facilities?

  • David M. Cook

    Col B, the payment was the ESA folks promised not to laugh when the SLS fails.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *