<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FBI accused of planting backdoor in OpenBSD IPSEC stack	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fbi-accused-of-planting-backdoor-in-openbsd-ipsec-stack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fbi-accused-of-planting-backdoor-in-openbsd-ipsec-stack/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:47:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kelly Starks		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fbi-accused-of-planting-backdoor-in-openbsd-ipsec-stack/#comment-6797</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Starks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=5333#comment-6797</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#062; I wonder what part of this sentence the FBI does not know how to read: “The right of the people to be secure
&#062;  in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be 
&#062;  violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and 
&#062;  particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”


I think its the &quot;..unreasonable ..&quot; part they are squishy on.

Did you hear a couple months ago that  the FBI announced that in cases that might involve terrorists, agents will at their discretion be allowed to take over corporate DB&#039;s and communications, without clearing it with the court - or allowing anyone to report it to the customers or general company personel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; I wonder what part of this sentence the FBI does not know how to read: “The right of the people to be secure<br />
&gt;  in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be<br />
&gt;  violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and<br />
&gt;  particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”</p>
<p>I think its the &#8220;..unreasonable ..&#8221; part they are squishy on.</p>
<p>Did you hear a couple months ago that  the FBI announced that in cases that might involve terrorists, agents will at their discretion be allowed to take over corporate DB&#8217;s and communications, without clearing it with the court &#8211; or allowing anyone to report it to the customers or general company personel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Trent Waddington		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/fbi-accused-of-planting-backdoor-in-openbsd-ipsec-stack/#comment-6732</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trent Waddington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=5333#comment-6732</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually no.  The guy making the accusations never worked on OpenBSD, didn&#039;t claim he did anything, and the people he accused have denied the allegations.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually no.  The guy making the accusations never worked on OpenBSD, didn&#8217;t claim he did anything, and the people he accused have denied the allegations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
