Scroll down to read this post.

 

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon. from any other book seller, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News


February 19, 2025 Quick space links

Courtesy of BtB’s stringer Jay. This post is also an open thread. I welcome my readers to post any comments or additional links relating to any space issues, even if unrelated to the links below.

Readers!

 

Every February I run a fund-raising drive during my birthday month. This year I celebrate my 72nd birthday, and hope and plan to continue writing and posting on Behind the Black for as long as I am able.

 

I hope my readers will support this effort. As I did in my November fund-raising drive, I am offering autographed copies of my books for large donations. Donate $250 and you can have a choice of the hardback of either Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8 or Conscious Choice: The origins of slavery in America and why it matters today and for our future in outer space. Donate $200 and you can get an autographed paperback copy of either. IMPORTANT! If you donate enough to get a book, please email me separately to tell me which book you want and the address to mail it to.

 

Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black. My analysis of space, politics, and culture, taken from the perspective of an historian, is almost always on the money and ahead of the game. For example, in 2020 I correctly predicted that the COVID panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Every one of those 2020 conclusions has turned out right.

 

Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.

 

You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are four ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription:

 

4. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.

12 comments

  • Richard M

    Best for Bob to hold and wait until all this is official, but I think it is worth noting: It appears that Associate Administrator Jim Free – until a few weeks ago, the head honcho of Artemis – is leaving NASA this week.

    The report comes from Joey Roulette of Reuters: “NASA’s associate administrator Jim Free, a key figure who has defended the agency’s moon program, is leaving NASA on Saturday, per two people familiar with his plans.”

    Eric Berger replies: “Have heard this as well, but nice to have confirmation. Free was brought in to NASA to protect the old guard, and did so.”

    Link: https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/1892322679845179778

    But there’s more. From Roulette’s story up tonight on Reuters:

    NASA is losing four key senior officials close to its flagship moon program, according to people familiar with the changes, adding more uncertainty over the agency’s space exploration trajectory as Elon Musk and President Donald Trump play up missions to Mars.

    Jim Free, NASA’s associate administrator who has been a central voice defending the agency’s Artemis moon program, is planning to leave the agency by Saturday, two sources said.

    And in Huntsville, Alabama, three key officials at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center – one of the agency’s ten field centers and the epicenter of its Artemis moon program – had their retirements announced internally on Tuesday, according to a person familiar with the announcement.

    Those roles at MSFC – chiefs of procurement, finance and information – were filled in an acting capacity by deputies and other NASA officials, the source said. No replacement for Free was announced, the two sources said.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/us/key-nasa-officials-departure-casts-more-uncertainty-over-us-moon-program-2025-02-19/

    House cleaning appears to be underway at NASA, and so far, it seems to be at least *nominally* voluntary.

  • Richard M

    P.S. Dave Huntsman, a familiar name to many people here, was having none of Roulette’s framing:

    Let’s be clear: Jim Free did Not ‘defend the moon program’; America leading to the Moon, then Mars, & beyond IS the correct thing to do. Free was specifically brought in to protect the old way of doing things as the only possible way to get back to the moon; i.e..,….

    Continuing to use sloth-like legacy players like Boeing for highest cost/minimum flexibility. He convinced Congress of false meme that Only by giving monies to them & Not reforming NASA or how it does business was the only way we could we ‘beat the Chinese’ back to the moon- which is the opposite of reality. That is Not the future.

    https://x.com/davehuntsman/status/1892333123284709546

    Hard to disagree with any of that.

  • Dick Eagleson

    Excellent news if true. When rats leave a sinking ship it’s generally the most senior rats who depart first. I view this in the same light as the reported large uptick in self-deportations by illegal immigrants – jumping when it’s apparent the jig is up instead of waiting to be pushed. Not that Jared won’t still have a fair amount of clean-up to do when he arrives, but every old-school sow’s ear who jumps into the dustbin on his or her own first is one less to deal with before getting down to the real work of restoring NASA’s former silk purse status.

  • Stan Witherspoon

    As far as “privately owned launch facilities” go, does Boca Chica not count?

  • Stan Witherspoon: Of course Boca Chica counts, but it achieved its first launch after Rocket Lab. Rocket Lab’s spaceport in New Zealand was first.

  • Richard N

    Hello Dick,

    Can’t disagree with any of that (of course).

    As has been observed by better people than me, the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate’s major challenge has been getting multiple systems developed (shorthand for designed, built, tested, and integrated). Jim Free was a bad match for that challenge as the only prior systems-level development experience that he had was with Orion, which should be an MIT case study in how not to do systems development. The same is true of Cathy Koerner — her only major systems-level development experience was with Orion. Clearly, however, Bill Nelson felt more comfortable putting Artemis in the hands of Old Guard veterans like these than he did with Kathy Lueders.

    I have no idea what Koerner’s fate is, but it seems likely she will be moving on before long, too.

  • Richard M

    Speaking of Free, by the way, we shouldn’t forget that he was quite willing, over and over again, to try to shift blame for Artemis schedule delays on to SpaceX, at least at moments when it wasn’t completely untenable. Someone over at the NSF forums just pointed out that back in June 2023, he was quoted in a Jeff Foust story throwing shade at SpaceX after the Flight 1 test.

    [Free] reiterated those schedule concerns later in the meeting when asked about the schedule for Artemis 3. “With the difficulties that SpaceX has had, I think that’s really concerning,” he said. “You can think about that slipping probably into ’26.”

    He hasn’t been able to do that so readily lately, for obvious reasons.

    It’s not hard to feel the suspicion that had it been up to Jim Free, SpaceX would never have been given the HLS contract.

  • Richard M

    Elon gave us another earthquake today:

    In a remarkable statement Thursday, SpaceX founder Elon Musk said the International Space Station should be deorbited “as soon as possible.”

    This comment from Musk will surely set off a landmine in the global space community, with broad implications. And it appears to be no idle comment from Musk who, at times, indulges in deliberately provocative posts on the social media network X that he owns.

    https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/02/elon-musk-recommends-that-the-international-space-station-be-deorbited-asap/

    Eric Berger (who penned the article here) prodded Elon to ask him just when he had in mind. Elon replied, “The decision is up to the President, but my recommendation is as soon as possible. I recommend 2 years from now,” Musk replied.”

    As Berger notes, Ted Cruz is having kittens over this already. (Cruz is chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, so that kinda matters.) Congressional leadership has *always* gone to the mat to protect ISS every time it is even hinted that NASA might deorbit it early. Trump has great leverage over the GOP caucus in both houses, but I can’t help but think that this is a bridge too far even for Elon.

    That said, it could be that Elon ends up shaking some other tree loose by doing this. Maybe this ends up being a negotiating ploy to kill SLS and Orion faster? (“OK, you guys agree to let us nuke these white elephants tomorrow, and we’ll agree to keep ISS up until 2030. And we’ll throw in Space Command and Ames at Huntsville as a cherry topper.”) Stay tuned.

  • Richard M

    Elon found a way to completely melt down Space Twitter, er, Space X, twice in one day. Holy moley.

    Well…go read it all yourself.

    https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1892584783064052114
    https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1892617681796264436

    Would love to see full documentation on just exactly what SpaceX offered, and what NASA officials discussed in response.

  • mkent

    ”The most important point is that it is the first privately owned and operated launch facility in the history of orbital rocketry.”

    No, it isn’t.

    ”Of course Boca Chica counts, but it achieved its first launch after Rocket Lab. Rocket Lab’s spaceport in New Zealand was first.”

    Nope. Boeing’s Sea Launch beat them both by decades.

  • Richard M

    Nope. Boeing’s Sea Launch beat them both by decades.

    Interesting point.

    What if we qualified it as “the first privately owned and operated *land-based* launch facility in the history of orbital rocketry”?

    If I was being snarky, I might say that it was the first privately owned and operated launch facility to be free of violations of the Arms Export Control Act…

  • mkent: I forgot about Sea Launch. But then it wasn’t entirely private, as the Russian government was a major owner.

    It also moved. :) I think Richard M is right that “land-based” is important.

Readers: the rules for commenting!

 

No registration is required. I welcome all opinions, even those that strongly criticize my commentary.

 

However, name-calling and obscenities will not be tolerated. First time offenders who are new to the site will be warned. Second time offenders or first time offenders who have been here awhile will be suspended for a week. After that, I will ban you. Period.

 

Note also that first time commenters as well as any comment with more than one link will be placed in moderation for my approval. Be patient, I will get to it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *