To read this post please scroll down.

 

Readers! A November fund-raising drive!

 

It is unfortunately time for another November fund-raising campaign to support my work here at Behind the Black. I really dislike doing these, but 2025 is so far turning out to be a very poor year for donations and subscriptions, the worst since 2020. I very much need your support for this webpage to survive.

 

And I think I provide real value. Fifteen years ago I said SLS was garbage and should be cancelled. Almost a decade ago I said Orion was a lie and a bad idea. As early as 1998, long before almost anyone else, I predicted in my first book, Genesis: The Story of Apollo 8, that private enterprise and freedom would conquer the solar system, not government. Very early in the COVID panic and continuing throughout I noted that every policy put forth by the government (masks, social distancing, lockdowns, jab mandates) was wrong, misguided, and did more harm than good. In planetary science, while everyone else in the media still thinks Mars has no water, I have been reporting the real results from the orbiters now for more than five years, that Mars is in fact a planet largely covered with ice.

 

I could continue with numerous other examples. If you want to know what others will discover a decade hence, read what I write here at Behind the Black. And if you read my most recent book, Conscious Choice, you will find out what is going to happen in space in the next century.

 

 

This last claim might sound like hubris on my part, but I base it on my overall track record.

 

So please consider donating or subscribing to Behind the Black, either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. I could really use the support at this time. There are five ways of doing so:

 

1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.

 

2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation. Takes about a 10% cut.
 

3. A Paypal Donation or subscription, which takes about a 15% cut:

 

4. Donate by check. I get whatever you donate. Make the check payable to Robert Zimmerman and mail it to
 
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652

 

You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above.


February 19, 2025 Quick space links

Courtesy of BtB’s stringer Jay. This post is also an open thread. I welcome my readers to post any comments or additional links relating to any space issues, even if unrelated to the links below.

Genesis cover

On Christmas Eve 1968 three Americans became the first humans to visit another world. What they did to celebrate was unexpected and profound, and will be remembered throughout all human history. Genesis: the Story of Apollo 8, Robert Zimmerman's classic history of humanity's first journey to another world, tells that story, and it is now available as both an ebook and an audiobook, both with a foreword by Valerie Anders and a new introduction by Robert Zimmerman.

 

The print edition can be purchased at Amazon or from any other book seller. If you want an autographed copy the price is $60 for the hardback and $45 for the paperback, plus $8 shipping for each. Go here for purchasing details. The ebook is available everywhere for $5.99 (before discount) at amazon, or direct from my ebook publisher, ebookit. If you buy it from ebookit you don't support the big tech companies and the author gets a bigger cut much sooner.


The audiobook is also available at all these vendors, and is also free with a 30-day trial membership to Audible.
 

"Not simply about one mission, [Genesis] is also the history of America's quest for the moon... Zimmerman has done a masterful job of tying disparate events together into a solid account of one of America's greatest human triumphs."--San Antonio Express-News

12 comments

  • Richard M

    Best for Bob to hold and wait until all this is official, but I think it is worth noting: It appears that Associate Administrator Jim Free – until a few weeks ago, the head honcho of Artemis – is leaving NASA this week.

    The report comes from Joey Roulette of Reuters: “NASA’s associate administrator Jim Free, a key figure who has defended the agency’s moon program, is leaving NASA on Saturday, per two people familiar with his plans.”

    Eric Berger replies: “Have heard this as well, but nice to have confirmation. Free was brought in to NASA to protect the old guard, and did so.”

    Link: https://x.com/SciGuySpace/status/1892322679845179778

    But there’s more. From Roulette’s story up tonight on Reuters:

    NASA is losing four key senior officials close to its flagship moon program, according to people familiar with the changes, adding more uncertainty over the agency’s space exploration trajectory as Elon Musk and President Donald Trump play up missions to Mars.

    Jim Free, NASA’s associate administrator who has been a central voice defending the agency’s Artemis moon program, is planning to leave the agency by Saturday, two sources said.

    And in Huntsville, Alabama, three key officials at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center – one of the agency’s ten field centers and the epicenter of its Artemis moon program – had their retirements announced internally on Tuesday, according to a person familiar with the announcement.

    Those roles at MSFC – chiefs of procurement, finance and information – were filled in an acting capacity by deputies and other NASA officials, the source said. No replacement for Free was announced, the two sources said.

    https://www.reuters.com/world/us/key-nasa-officials-departure-casts-more-uncertainty-over-us-moon-program-2025-02-19/

    House cleaning appears to be underway at NASA, and so far, it seems to be at least *nominally* voluntary.

  • Richard M

    P.S. Dave Huntsman, a familiar name to many people here, was having none of Roulette’s framing:

    Let’s be clear: Jim Free did Not ‘defend the moon program’; America leading to the Moon, then Mars, & beyond IS the correct thing to do. Free was specifically brought in to protect the old way of doing things as the only possible way to get back to the moon; i.e..,….

    Continuing to use sloth-like legacy players like Boeing for highest cost/minimum flexibility. He convinced Congress of false meme that Only by giving monies to them & Not reforming NASA or how it does business was the only way we could we ‘beat the Chinese’ back to the moon- which is the opposite of reality. That is Not the future.

    https://x.com/davehuntsman/status/1892333123284709546

    Hard to disagree with any of that.

  • Dick Eagleson

    Excellent news if true. When rats leave a sinking ship it’s generally the most senior rats who depart first. I view this in the same light as the reported large uptick in self-deportations by illegal immigrants – jumping when it’s apparent the jig is up instead of waiting to be pushed. Not that Jared won’t still have a fair amount of clean-up to do when he arrives, but every old-school sow’s ear who jumps into the dustbin on his or her own first is one less to deal with before getting down to the real work of restoring NASA’s former silk purse status.

  • Stan Witherspoon

    As far as “privately owned launch facilities” go, does Boca Chica not count?

  • Stan Witherspoon: Of course Boca Chica counts, but it achieved its first launch after Rocket Lab. Rocket Lab’s spaceport in New Zealand was first.

  • Richard N

    Hello Dick,

    Can’t disagree with any of that (of course).

    As has been observed by better people than me, the Exploration Systems Mission Directorate’s major challenge has been getting multiple systems developed (shorthand for designed, built, tested, and integrated). Jim Free was a bad match for that challenge as the only prior systems-level development experience that he had was with Orion, which should be an MIT case study in how not to do systems development. The same is true of Cathy Koerner — her only major systems-level development experience was with Orion. Clearly, however, Bill Nelson felt more comfortable putting Artemis in the hands of Old Guard veterans like these than he did with Kathy Lueders.

    I have no idea what Koerner’s fate is, but it seems likely she will be moving on before long, too.

  • Richard M

    Speaking of Free, by the way, we shouldn’t forget that he was quite willing, over and over again, to try to shift blame for Artemis schedule delays on to SpaceX, at least at moments when it wasn’t completely untenable. Someone over at the NSF forums just pointed out that back in June 2023, he was quoted in a Jeff Foust story throwing shade at SpaceX after the Flight 1 test.

    [Free] reiterated those schedule concerns later in the meeting when asked about the schedule for Artemis 3. “With the difficulties that SpaceX has had, I think that’s really concerning,” he said. “You can think about that slipping probably into ’26.”

    He hasn’t been able to do that so readily lately, for obvious reasons.

    It’s not hard to feel the suspicion that had it been up to Jim Free, SpaceX would never have been given the HLS contract.

  • Richard M

    Elon gave us another earthquake today:

    In a remarkable statement Thursday, SpaceX founder Elon Musk said the International Space Station should be deorbited “as soon as possible.”

    This comment from Musk will surely set off a landmine in the global space community, with broad implications. And it appears to be no idle comment from Musk who, at times, indulges in deliberately provocative posts on the social media network X that he owns.

    https://arstechnica.com/space/2025/02/elon-musk-recommends-that-the-international-space-station-be-deorbited-asap/

    Eric Berger (who penned the article here) prodded Elon to ask him just when he had in mind. Elon replied, “The decision is up to the President, but my recommendation is as soon as possible. I recommend 2 years from now,” Musk replied.”

    As Berger notes, Ted Cruz is having kittens over this already. (Cruz is chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, so that kinda matters.) Congressional leadership has *always* gone to the mat to protect ISS every time it is even hinted that NASA might deorbit it early. Trump has great leverage over the GOP caucus in both houses, but I can’t help but think that this is a bridge too far even for Elon.

    That said, it could be that Elon ends up shaking some other tree loose by doing this. Maybe this ends up being a negotiating ploy to kill SLS and Orion faster? (“OK, you guys agree to let us nuke these white elephants tomorrow, and we’ll agree to keep ISS up until 2030. And we’ll throw in Space Command and Ames at Huntsville as a cherry topper.”) Stay tuned.

  • Richard M

    Elon found a way to completely melt down Space Twitter, er, Space X, twice in one day. Holy moley.

    Well…go read it all yourself.

    https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1892584783064052114
    https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1892617681796264436

    Would love to see full documentation on just exactly what SpaceX offered, and what NASA officials discussed in response.

  • mkent

    ”The most important point is that it is the first privately owned and operated launch facility in the history of orbital rocketry.”

    No, it isn’t.

    ”Of course Boca Chica counts, but it achieved its first launch after Rocket Lab. Rocket Lab’s spaceport in New Zealand was first.”

    Nope. Boeing’s Sea Launch beat them both by decades.

  • Richard M

    Nope. Boeing’s Sea Launch beat them both by decades.

    Interesting point.

    What if we qualified it as “the first privately owned and operated *land-based* launch facility in the history of orbital rocketry”?

    If I was being snarky, I might say that it was the first privately owned and operated launch facility to be free of violations of the Arms Export Control Act…

  • mkent: I forgot about Sea Launch. But then it wasn’t entirely private, as the Russian government was a major owner.

    It also moved. :) I think Richard M is right that “land-based” is important.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *