<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Globular clusters not as old as universe?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/globular-clusters-not-as-old-as-universe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/globular-clusters-not-as-old-as-universe/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 15:06:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Phill O		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/globular-clusters-not-as-old-as-universe/#comment-1053735</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phill O]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2018 15:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=51966#comment-1053735</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Were some globular clusters not home for some blue stars: which are quite young?

I am reminded of Linus Pauling&#039;s &quot;Valence bond&quot; theory ( a Nobel Laureate) which has been replace by molecular orbital theory.  Yes, there is uncertainty in science.  The key is &quot;always&quot; indicating that this is a &quot;theory&quot;.    Those from the AGW model would do well to practice this (as well as the ozone hole theorists).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Were some globular clusters not home for some blue stars: which are quite young?</p>
<p>I am reminded of Linus Pauling&#8217;s &#8220;Valence bond&#8221; theory ( a Nobel Laureate) which has been replace by molecular orbital theory.  Yes, there is uncertainty in science.  The key is &#8220;always&#8221; indicating that this is a &#8220;theory&#8221;.    Those from the AGW model would do well to practice this (as well as the ozone hole theorists).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
