<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Greenland ice sheet not covered in soot	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/greenland-ice-sheet-not-covered-in-soot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/greenland-ice-sheet-not-covered-in-soot/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2015 17:15:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/greenland-ice-sheet-not-covered-in-soot/#comment-821009</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2015 17:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=36588#comment-821009</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I wish someone would keep a handy list of these stories to refer to when arguments arise over the validity of the &quot;science&quot; in regards to AGW.

WattsUpWithThat is a good resource, as is Roberts site here, but when engaging with people who just keep repeating &quot;the science is settled&quot; it would be nice to refer to a single, easy to read and search, site of the failings of AGW science....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish someone would keep a handy list of these stories to refer to when arguments arise over the validity of the &#8220;science&#8221; in regards to AGW.</p>
<p>WattsUpWithThat is a good resource, as is Roberts site here, but when engaging with people who just keep repeating &#8220;the science is settled&#8221; it would be nice to refer to a single, easy to read and search, site of the failings of AGW science&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
