<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Haven-1 launch delayed until 2027	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/haven-1-launch-delayed-until-2027/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/haven-1-launch-delayed-until-2027/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:52:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dick Eagleson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/haven-1-launch-delayed-until-2027/#comment-1627804</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=120909#comment-1627804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Edward,

I don&#039;t think anything said publicly by a company CEO can fairly be considered &quot;rumor.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think anything said publicly by a company CEO can fairly be considered &#8220;rumor.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/haven-1-launch-delayed-until-2027/#comment-1627792</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 03:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=120909#comment-1627792</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robert Zimmerman&#039;s comment: &quot;&lt;em&gt;Up until this interview, the company had been claiming it would launch in the first half of ’26. Now it is aiming for the first quarter of ’27.&lt;/em&gt;&quot; 

As I post this comment, RocketLaunchLive still has the Haven-1 launch scheduled in May of this year.  
https://www.rocketlaunch.live 

I count that as being the latest announced (by press release) launch date.  I&#039;m not sure what we all would consider to be an official announcement, but I think that an interview is not as official as a press release announcement.  It may be reality, or closer to it, but is it a rumor, or is it more than a rumor?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert Zimmerman&#8217;s comment: &#8220;<em>Up until this interview, the company had been claiming it would launch in the first half of ’26. Now it is aiming for the first quarter of ’27.</em>&#8221; </p>
<p>As I post this comment, RocketLaunchLive still has the Haven-1 launch scheduled in May of this year.<br />
<a href="https://www.rocketlaunch.live" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.rocketlaunch.live</a> </p>
<p>I count that as being the latest announced (by press release) launch date.  I&#8217;m not sure what we all would consider to be an official announcement, but I think that an interview is not as official as a press release announcement.  It may be reality, or closer to it, but is it a rumor, or is it more than a rumor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard M		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/haven-1-launch-delayed-until-2027/#comment-1627773</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 17:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=120909#comment-1627773</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Haot had been talking along the lines of &quot;Summer 2026&quot; when I&#039;d been last tracking this. Now he says it&#039;s 1Q 2027, and further that this has really been their super secret internal timeline all along. That makes it closer to what Dick says -- 9 months -- but then that assumes no further schedule slips. Which is, well, hard to be sure of. 

I grok that what they&#039;re doing is hugely difficult and on a hugely accelerated timeline, and stuff happens. A failure of the station on orbit would be devastating, probably fatal for the company, so they need to be sure it&#039;s really in good order. But yeah, I think it would have been better to just be up front and say that &quot;2026&quot; ain&#039;t happening.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haot had been talking along the lines of &#8220;Summer 2026&#8221; when I&#8217;d been last tracking this. Now he says it&#8217;s 1Q 2027, and further that this has really been their super secret internal timeline all along. That makes it closer to what Dick says &#8212; 9 months &#8212; but then that assumes no further schedule slips. Which is, well, hard to be sure of. </p>
<p>I grok that what they&#8217;re doing is hugely difficult and on a hugely accelerated timeline, and stuff happens. A failure of the station on orbit would be devastating, probably fatal for the company, so they need to be sure it&#8217;s really in good order. But yeah, I think it would have been better to just be up front and say that &#8220;2026&#8221; ain&#8217;t happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dick Eagleson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/haven-1-launch-delayed-until-2027/#comment-1627756</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 05:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=120909#comment-1627756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Richard &#038; Robert,

I make the delay about 9 months.

A possible motivation for Vast&#039;s continuing with the mid-2026 story until recently is that this would have placed Haven-1&#039;s notional launch in an earlier calendar year than that of Axiom&#039;s first module.  Now that Axiom has officially slipped its own initial module launch until 2028, Vast can now acknowledge a 2027 launch date for Haven-1 and still preserve that earlier calendar year thing.  Both companies have, it would seem, been playing a game of chicken with schedules.  When neither could keep up the pretense that their originally announced schedules would hold, first one, then the other, elected to acknowledge reality - or at least something closer to it.  Venial sins at best in the space patch.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard &amp; Robert,</p>
<p>I make the delay about 9 months.</p>
<p>A possible motivation for Vast&#8217;s continuing with the mid-2026 story until recently is that this would have placed Haven-1&#8217;s notional launch in an earlier calendar year than that of Axiom&#8217;s first module.  Now that Axiom has officially slipped its own initial module launch until 2028, Vast can now acknowledge a 2027 launch date for Haven-1 and still preserve that earlier calendar year thing.  Both companies have, it would seem, been playing a game of chicken with schedules.  When neither could keep up the pretense that their originally announced schedules would hold, first one, then the other, elected to acknowledge reality &#8211; or at least something closer to it.  Venial sins at best in the space patch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Zimmerman		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/haven-1-launch-delayed-until-2027/#comment-1627751</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Zimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=120909#comment-1627751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/haven-1-launch-delayed-until-2027/#comment-1627750&quot;&gt;Richard M&lt;/a&gt;.

Richard M: It is actually a large schedule slide. Up until this interview, the company had been claiming it would launch in the first half of &#039;26. Now it is aiming for the first quarter of &#039;27. That&#039;s essentially a year delay, as far as I am concerned.

As I noted in my post, I instantly thought they have been hiding this launch date, giving out a fake earlier date when they knew the launch would be later. I understand why startups do this, but I still think it is a bad look.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/haven-1-launch-delayed-until-2027/#comment-1627750">Richard M</a>.</p>
<p>Richard M: It is actually a large schedule slide. Up until this interview, the company had been claiming it would launch in the first half of &#8217;26. Now it is aiming for the first quarter of &#8217;27. That&#8217;s essentially a year delay, as far as I am concerned.</p>
<p>As I noted in my post, I instantly thought they have been hiding this launch date, giving out a fake earlier date when they knew the launch would be later. I understand why startups do this, but I still think it is a bad look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard M		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/haven-1-launch-delayed-until-2027/#comment-1627750</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=120909#comment-1627750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Haot seemed at pains to emphasize that, as far as internal planning was concerned, nothing has changed: they have been &quot;tracking&quot; the 1Q 2027 time frame for launch for quite a while now. They&#039;re just making it public now, he seems to say.

Of course, that could be spin. But either way, it&#039;s a small schedule slide, so...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haot seemed at pains to emphasize that, as far as internal planning was concerned, nothing has changed: they have been &#8220;tracking&#8221; the 1Q 2027 time frame for launch for quite a while now. They&#8217;re just making it public now, he seems to say.</p>
<p>Of course, that could be spin. But either way, it&#8217;s a small schedule slide, so&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
