<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How the Earth gave the Moon a lemon shape	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/how-the-earth-gave-the-moon-a-lemon-shape/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/how-the-earth-gave-the-moon-a-lemon-shape/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:39:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: mpthompson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/how-the-earth-gave-the-moon-a-lemon-shape/#comment-199571</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mpthompson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2014 00:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=29899#comment-199571</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve always wondered if the maria which dominate the near side of the moon were essentially caused by tidal action on the young Moon whereby the Earth&#039;s gravity literally pulled an ocean of liquid magma up through fissures on the young thin crust.  This magma would have pooled and formed the maria floors.  Given the Moon was much closer to the Earth during its formation, Earth&#039;s gravity was probably one of the dominating factors that give the Moon a number of odd characteristics.

I&#039;ve read other theories regarding the maria that internal radioactivity that kept the Moon&#039;s interior on the near side hotter than on the far side, but I&#039;m don&#039;t see a mechanism by which radioactive elements wouldn&#039;t generally be evenly distributed within the Moon&#039;s interior.   Or other theories that the Earth somehow steered large objects to predominantly strike the near side of the moon, but this doesn&#039;t seem to make much sense either.  Finally, I&#039;ve seen other theories that the young Earth&#039;s surface was so hot that it heated up the near surface of the Moon and filled the maria with magma from this heat, but I don&#039; think the Moon was ever close enough for heat that radiated from Earth to have much impact on the moon.

Anyway, fun stuff to think about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always wondered if the maria which dominate the near side of the moon were essentially caused by tidal action on the young Moon whereby the Earth&#8217;s gravity literally pulled an ocean of liquid magma up through fissures on the young thin crust.  This magma would have pooled and formed the maria floors.  Given the Moon was much closer to the Earth during its formation, Earth&#8217;s gravity was probably one of the dominating factors that give the Moon a number of odd characteristics.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read other theories regarding the maria that internal radioactivity that kept the Moon&#8217;s interior on the near side hotter than on the far side, but I&#8217;m don&#8217;t see a mechanism by which radioactive elements wouldn&#8217;t generally be evenly distributed within the Moon&#8217;s interior.   Or other theories that the Earth somehow steered large objects to predominantly strike the near side of the moon, but this doesn&#8217;t seem to make much sense either.  Finally, I&#8217;ve seen other theories that the young Earth&#8217;s surface was so hot that it heated up the near surface of the Moon and filled the maria with magma from this heat, but I don&#8217; think the Moon was ever close enough for heat that radiated from Earth to have much impact on the moon.</p>
<p>Anyway, fun stuff to think about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
