<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: India to build a smallsat rocket	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/india-to-build-a-smallsat-rocket/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/india-to-build-a-smallsat-rocket/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 23:02:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/india-to-build-a-smallsat-rocket/#comment-1031521</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2017 23:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=49253#comment-1031521</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Localfluff wrote: &quot;&lt;i&gt;I like bigger rockets more than small rockets. Small sats replacing big sats with constellations should be able to launch en masse at once on the same big launcher.&lt;/i&gt;&quot; 

Agreed.  

Bigger rockets just have more excitement to them.  

Initial placement of constellations and replacement constellations would likely best be done on bigger rockets, one for each orbital plane.  Replacement of individual satellites in the constellation would likely best be done on smaller rockets.  Theoretically, a smaller rocket can be made ready for launch faster than a big rocket, thus have a faster turnaround time from order to launch.  Smaller rockets should also be less expensive per launch, so launching a single satellite on a small racket should also be the less expensive choice.  

I do not see larger rockets going out of style, but I see smaller rockets coming into style.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Localfluff wrote: &#8220;<i>I like bigger rockets more than small rockets. Small sats replacing big sats with constellations should be able to launch en masse at once on the same big launcher.</i>&#8221; </p>
<p>Agreed.  </p>
<p>Bigger rockets just have more excitement to them.  </p>
<p>Initial placement of constellations and replacement constellations would likely best be done on bigger rockets, one for each orbital plane.  Replacement of individual satellites in the constellation would likely best be done on smaller rockets.  Theoretically, a smaller rocket can be made ready for launch faster than a big rocket, thus have a faster turnaround time from order to launch.  Smaller rockets should also be less expensive per launch, so launching a single satellite on a small racket should also be the less expensive choice.  </p>
<p>I do not see larger rockets going out of style, but I see smaller rockets coming into style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Localfluff		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/india-to-build-a-smallsat-rocket/#comment-1030598</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Localfluff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 06:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=49253#comment-1030598</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like bigger rockets more than small rockets. Small sats replacing big sats with constellations should be able to launch en masse at once on the same big launcher. A dedicated launcher requires either a pretty valuable small sat or really low reusability costs. It better work as regularly as a space elevator using a refueled rocket engine instead of a string. Btw, last weeks FISO was about space debris. It seems a single incident today could turn this threat into a real problem.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like bigger rockets more than small rockets. Small sats replacing big sats with constellations should be able to launch en masse at once on the same big launcher. A dedicated launcher requires either a pretty valuable small sat or really low reusability costs. It better work as regularly as a space elevator using a refueled rocket engine instead of a string. Btw, last weeks FISO was about space debris. It seems a single incident today could turn this threat into a real problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Edward		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/india-to-build-a-smallsat-rocket/#comment-1030478</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=49253#comment-1030478</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Robert wrote: &quot;&lt;i&gt;I predict that in ten years most unmanned satellites launched to circle the Earth will be tiny and launched on tiny rockets, while simultaneously we will see a new generation of giant rockets putting manned spacecraft into orbit and beyond.&lt;/i&gt;&quot; 

I would not bet against that.  Even the US Air Force is realizing that a small number of large satellites are more vulnerable than a large number of small satellites, so they are seriously considering moving much of their current capability to future small satellite constellations.  

Considering the very large number of cubesats placed in orbit over the past three years, the first part of the prediction is close to being realized already.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert wrote: &#8220;<i>I predict that in ten years most unmanned satellites launched to circle the Earth will be tiny and launched on tiny rockets, while simultaneously we will see a new generation of giant rockets putting manned spacecraft into orbit and beyond.</i>&#8221; </p>
<p>I would not bet against that.  Even the US Air Force is realizing that a small number of large satellites are more vulnerable than a large number of small satellites, so they are seriously considering moving much of their current capability to future small satellite constellations.  </p>
<p>Considering the very large number of cubesats placed in orbit over the past three years, the first part of the prediction is close to being realized already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
