<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: India&#8217;s 2019 space plans	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/indias-2019-space-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/indias-2019-space-plans/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:43:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dick Eagleson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/indias-2019-space-plans/#comment-1062861</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2019 19:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=55494#comment-1062861</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If SH-Starship development moves as quickly as current SpaceX plans call for, the first Starship landing on the Moon will happen years before even the first piece of Gateway is delivered to lunar orbit.  This will be true even if there are two or three years of schedule slippage for SH-Starship.  But I think SH-Starship will be pretty much on-time arrivals.  If this is even approximately true, I hope it results in the cancellation of Gateway - and of SLS and Orion, too, if both have not already been cancelled even earlier.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If SH-Starship development moves as quickly as current SpaceX plans call for, the first Starship landing on the Moon will happen years before even the first piece of Gateway is delivered to lunar orbit.  This will be true even if there are two or three years of schedule slippage for SH-Starship.  But I think SH-Starship will be pretty much on-time arrivals.  If this is even approximately true, I hope it results in the cancellation of Gateway &#8211; and of SLS and Orion, too, if both have not already been cancelled even earlier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: William Barton		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/indias-2019-space-plans/#comment-1062810</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William Barton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2019 20:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=55494#comment-1062810</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[India could, if it wanted, put a crew on the Moon before China, via a 4-launch scenario using GSLV mk. III. They&#039;re clearly capable of designing an Apollo LM-class lander to go with Gaganyaan. EOR for LM+transstage. EOR for Gaganyaan+transstage. Then LOR for LM+Gaganyaan. It&#039;d be little, but it&#039;d be done, and probably before the Chinese get to the Moon. Of course, a SpaceX Starship will probably get there first, and they can call be cheered on by the crew of the LOP-G.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>India could, if it wanted, put a crew on the Moon before China, via a 4-launch scenario using GSLV mk. III. They&#8217;re clearly capable of designing an Apollo LM-class lander to go with Gaganyaan. EOR for LM+transstage. EOR for Gaganyaan+transstage. Then LOR for LM+Gaganyaan. It&#8217;d be little, but it&#8217;d be done, and probably before the Chinese get to the Moon. Of course, a SpaceX Starship will probably get there first, and they can call be cheered on by the crew of the LOP-G.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
