Comments on: Iran deal “not legally binding”

By: Al

Al — Thu, 26 Nov 2015 12:01:00 +0000

The Iran deal was really about providing cover for Iran while they develop their bomb just like freeing Bowe Bergdahl was just an excuse to release terrorist leaders. Obama sympathizes with the Muslim cause and view western civilization as the font of all evil. Most of what he does makes perfect sense when viewed from this perspective.

By: Keith

Keith — Thu, 26 Nov 2015 05:26:12 +0000

Too bad the last two presidential elections were legally binding.

By: Phill O

Phill O — Wed, 25 Nov 2015 22:12:07 +0000

As we learn more and more about Hilliary and the Clinton Foundation, it would not surprise me if the only motivating factor behind Obama and the Iran Nuclear Deal is money in his pocket and those supporting him.

I believe what is morally offensive to Obama, is extortion money not going to him. A little harsh, but the reality I have come to a conclusion on.

By: Cotour

Cotour — Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:37:35 +0000

“and would probably include everyone here – including Bob.”

Everyone here STARTING with Bob!

By: hondo

hondo — Wed, 25 Nov 2015 19:32:47 +0000

He (they) do not see Iran as an immediate enemy. He (they) see those “bitter clingers” as the true immediate enemy. His (they) definition of a “bitter clinger” is extremely broad, and would probably include everyone here – including Bob.

Sad situation with ominous overtones. I have no idea how this will turn out. I am retired and relocating in a matter of weeks to “bitter clinger” territory in Pa. Eventually will end up in the Appalachians of W Va. Come a long way since Flatbush Brooklyn. Guess I’ll just have to sit back and watch from my front porch.

By: Cotour

Cotour — Wed, 25 Nov 2015 18:04:42 +0000

Is there a point where whether strategies applied to Iran over the years is morally offensive to Obama or not there comes a point where taking actions that may be intended to reconcile in someones personal opinion (Obama’s) those strategies boarders on treason?

I call Obama a moral litteralist, he seems unable or unwilling to see things in any other way other than from the point of view of his personal morality or belief system. And if you know anything about the administration of government, morality for the most part really has no place in the calculus. Morality in this core context is optional, more window dressing for public consumption than anything else.

He and his henchman, Kerry, another leftist, seems very focused on creating a power parity rather than acting in the interests of America. You do not empower an enemy government when it is not in any way necessary. When someone in power empowers an enemy for no good reason other than a personal opinion there is a name for that action.

We are all witness to the confusion and danger in the world when these weak idealistic thoughts are realized. Taking care of business sometimes means doing what is personally offensive to leadership.