<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: It appears that Facebook has censored a post by the Navy Seals merely because it was critical of President Obama.	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/it-appears-that-facebook-has-censored-a-post-by-the-navy-seals-merely-because-it-was-critical-of-president-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/it-appears-that-facebook-has-censored-a-post-by-the-navy-seals-merely-because-it-was-critical-of-president-obama/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:01:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Blair Ivey		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/it-appears-that-facebook-has-censored-a-post-by-the-navy-seals-merely-because-it-was-critical-of-president-obama/#comment-68379</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blair Ivey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 07:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=20504#comment-68379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I looked up the Facebook Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. Although the the article doesn&#039;t say specifically why Facebook took down the content, they may have done so under Section 3, #6, which states:

&quot;You will not bully, intimidate, or harass any user.&quot;

And Section 5, #2:

&quot;We can remove any content or information you post on Facebook if we believe that it violates this Statement or our policies&quot;

President Obama does have a Facebook page, making him a user. Facebook has a legally defensible case for what they did, though perhaps not a morally defensible one.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked up the Facebook Statement of Rights and Responsibilities. Although the the article doesn&#8217;t say specifically why Facebook took down the content, they may have done so under Section 3, #6, which states:</p>
<p>&#8220;You will not bully, intimidate, or harass any user.&#8221;</p>
<p>And Section 5, #2:</p>
<p>&#8220;We can remove any content or information you post on Facebook if we believe that it violates this Statement or our policies&#8221;</p>
<p>President Obama does have a Facebook page, making him a user. Facebook has a legally defensible case for what they did, though perhaps not a morally defensible one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
