<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: January 29, 2026 Quick space links	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 02:45:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Wright		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628122</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2026 02:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=121103#comment-1628122</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Before it was ISS, it was called Freedom...box frame or dual keel.

I liked Bush 41...he was pro-space]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Before it was ISS, it was called Freedom&#8230;box frame or dual keel.</p>
<p>I liked Bush 41&#8230;he was pro-space</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: F		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628092</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[F]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 18:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=121103#comment-1628092</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SpaceX and xAI news:

https://nypost.com/2026/01/29/business/elon-musks-spacex-in-merger-talks-with-xai-ahead-of-potential-blockbuster-ipo-report/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SpaceX and xAI news:</p>
<p><a href="https://nypost.com/2026/01/29/business/elon-musks-spacex-in-merger-talks-with-xai-ahead-of-potential-blockbuster-ipo-report/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://nypost.com/2026/01/29/business/elon-musks-spacex-in-merger-talks-with-xai-ahead-of-potential-blockbuster-ipo-report/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Zimmerman		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628089</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Zimmerman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 17:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=121103#comment-1628089</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628085&quot;&gt;Richard M&lt;/a&gt;.

Richard M: I have been reviewing the FAA EIS summary and plan to post about it later today.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628085">Richard M</a>.</p>
<p>Richard M: I have been reviewing the FAA EIS summary and plan to post about it later today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard M		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 17:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=121103#comment-1628085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jay likely caught this already for you, Bob, but just in case:

https://www.faa.gov/space/stakeholder_engagement/spacex_starship_ksc/SpaceX-SSH-LC-39A-Final-EIS_Executive-Summary.pdf

Today the FAA has advanced approval for up to 44 Starship launches from LC-39A at KSC.

NSF is the only one with a story up so far on this, so far as I can make out, for what it is worth: https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2026/01/faa-advances-approval-44-starship-launches-39a/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jay likely caught this already for you, Bob, but just in case:</p>
<p><a href="https://www.faa.gov/space/stakeholder_engagement/spacex_starship_ksc/SpaceX-SSH-LC-39A-Final-EIS_Executive-Summary.pdf" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.faa.gov/space/stakeholder_engagement/spacex_starship_ksc/SpaceX-SSH-LC-39A-Final-EIS_Executive-Summary.pdf</a></p>
<p>Today the FAA has advanced approval for up to 44 Starship launches from LC-39A at KSC.</p>
<p>NSF is the only one with a story up so far on this, so far as I can make out, for what it is worth: <a href="https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2026/01/faa-advances-approval-44-starship-launches-39a/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2026/01/faa-advances-approval-44-starship-launches-39a/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nate P		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628070</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 13:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=121103#comment-1628070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[SpaceX is making ephemeris data free for all through a program called Stargaze: https://starlink.com/updates/stargaze]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SpaceX is making ephemeris data free for all through a program called Stargaze: <a href="https://starlink.com/updates/stargaze" rel="nofollow ugc">https://starlink.com/updates/stargaze</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nate P		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628067</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 12:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=121103#comment-1628067</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jeff Wright: I hope we don’t. As Dick said, it doesn’t lend itself well to maintenance, expansion, or even daily life. We can do better, and we will. At least three companies are currently developing modules which would make building a station larger than the ISS much more affordable, practical, and speedy, and as costs drop and companies find more avenues to make money off space, we’ll see more stations spring up. Perhaps Blue will simply put Reef on hold until Limp sees a more opportune time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff Wright: I hope we don’t. As Dick said, it doesn’t lend itself well to maintenance, expansion, or even daily life. We can do better, and we will. At least three companies are currently developing modules which would make building a station larger than the ISS much more affordable, practical, and speedy, and as costs drop and companies find more avenues to make money off space, we’ll see more stations spring up. Perhaps Blue will simply put Reef on hold until Limp sees a more opportune time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dick Eagleson		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628061</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 05:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=121103#comment-1628061</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nate P,

I have to agree that an &quot;out of the blue&quot; (pun definitely intended) reference to Orbital Reef after, literally, &lt;i&gt;years&lt;/i&gt; of silence on the topic is a bit startling.  Weirdly encouraging too - but startling.

mkent,

Thanks for the Varda update.  One hopes Winnebago-5 represents the comprehensive chasing down and squishing of whatever bugs there were in Winnebago-4.  Always good to see more use cases for commercial activity in LEO emerging.  Once Varda gets to the point where it has a Winnebago riding on &lt;i&gt;every&lt;/i&gt; Transporter mission - and maybe the Bandwagons too - the next logical step up is either bigger &quot;motor homes&quot; or, as a number of LEO satellite constellation operators have been doing for some time, putting &lt;i&gt;two&lt;/i&gt; or more Winnebagos on each such rideshare.  Kooniba may have to get used to being peppered on a regular basis.

Jeff Wright,

In a very literal sense, I hope we never &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt; see another space station like the ISS.  It has always been a sort of camel whose creators were trying for a horse, but missed.  ISS isn&#039;t scalable, designed for either easy or EVA-free repair and maintenance and requires highly-trained astronauts to spend far to much of their time being weightless janitors, handymen, stevedores and warehousemen.  And it has &lt;i&gt;no laundry facilities&lt;/i&gt; - which makes its default odor that of, say, a vintage gym like the one Rocky worked out in.

No one not given to pathological nostalgia is going to miss that thing a bit when it&#039;s finally gone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nate P,</p>
<p>I have to agree that an &#8220;out of the blue&#8221; (pun definitely intended) reference to Orbital Reef after, literally, <i>years</i> of silence on the topic is a bit startling.  Weirdly encouraging too &#8211; but startling.</p>
<p>mkent,</p>
<p>Thanks for the Varda update.  One hopes Winnebago-5 represents the comprehensive chasing down and squishing of whatever bugs there were in Winnebago-4.  Always good to see more use cases for commercial activity in LEO emerging.  Once Varda gets to the point where it has a Winnebago riding on <i>every</i> Transporter mission &#8211; and maybe the Bandwagons too &#8211; the next logical step up is either bigger &#8220;motor homes&#8221; or, as a number of LEO satellite constellation operators have been doing for some time, putting <i>two</i> or more Winnebagos on each such rideshare.  Kooniba may have to get used to being peppered on a regular basis.</p>
<p>Jeff Wright,</p>
<p>In a very literal sense, I hope we never <i>do</i> see another space station like the ISS.  It has always been a sort of camel whose creators were trying for a horse, but missed.  ISS isn&#8217;t scalable, designed for either easy or EVA-free repair and maintenance and requires highly-trained astronauts to spend far to much of their time being weightless janitors, handymen, stevedores and warehousemen.  And it has <i>no laundry facilities</i> &#8211; which makes its default odor that of, say, a vintage gym like the one Rocky worked out in.</p>
<p>No one not given to pathological nostalgia is going to miss that thing a bit when it&#8217;s finally gone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeff Wright		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628055</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 02:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=121103#comment-1628055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To Nate.

I still look for Bezos to abandon his vaporware reef.

Other than one or two beehive plus sized private modules, humanity may never see the likes of ISS again]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Nate.</p>
<p>I still look for Bezos to abandon his vaporware reef.</p>
<p>Other than one or two beehive plus sized private modules, humanity may never see the likes of ISS again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mkent		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628053</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mkent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 02:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=121103#comment-1628053</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Varda has now announced the successful landing of W-5 and confirmed that it had a Varda bus.  It also appears that W-6 and W-7 are flying on Transporter-16 and -17, respectively.  They seem to be picking up the pace.  Good to see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Varda has now announced the successful landing of W-5 and confirmed that it had a Varda bus.  It also appears that W-6 and W-7 are flying on Transporter-16 and -17, respectively.  They seem to be picking up the pace.  Good to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mkent		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628051</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mkent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 01:32:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=121103#comment-1628051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Varda’s Winnebago-5 has re-entered over Australia in an apparent landing attempt.  I haven’t heard anything yet as to whether the landing was successful.

That appears to leave Winnebago-4 still in orbit.  I’ve heard rumors that Varda has had multiple problems with it, even that it was lost, though I’m not sure that that’s the case.  W-4 was Varda’s first in-house spacecraft.  Previous spacecraft buses were built by Rocket Lab and combined with the Varda re-entry capsule.

Rocket Lab delivered a fourth spacecraft bus to Varda.  Does anyone know whether W-5 had the fourth Rocket Lab bus or the second Varda bus?  I’m guessing that since Rocket Lab didn’t make an announcement of imminent re-entry as they had with Winnebagos 1-3 that it had Varda bus #2.  Does anyone know for sure?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Varda’s Winnebago-5 has re-entered over Australia in an apparent landing attempt.  I haven’t heard anything yet as to whether the landing was successful.</p>
<p>That appears to leave Winnebago-4 still in orbit.  I’ve heard rumors that Varda has had multiple problems with it, even that it was lost, though I’m not sure that that’s the case.  W-4 was Varda’s first in-house spacecraft.  Previous spacecraft buses were built by Rocket Lab and combined with the Varda re-entry capsule.</p>
<p>Rocket Lab delivered a fourth spacecraft bus to Varda.  Does anyone know whether W-5 had the fourth Rocket Lab bus or the second Varda bus?  I’m guessing that since Rocket Lab didn’t make an announcement of imminent re-entry as they had with Winnebagos 1-3 that it had Varda bus #2.  Does anyone know for sure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Nate P		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/january-29-2026-quick-space-links/#comment-1628050</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nate P]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 01:19:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=121103#comment-1628050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I’ve half thought Blue would abandon Orbital Reef, given Bezos’s lunar ambitions, and Limp’s efforts at getting Blue focused on delivering rather than announcing a whole swarm of projects, but docking is useful on multiple fronts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve half thought Blue would abandon Orbital Reef, given Bezos’s lunar ambitions, and Limp’s efforts at getting Blue focused on delivering rather than announcing a whole swarm of projects, but docking is useful on multiple fronts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
