Kansas sues Pfizer for lying about the safety and effectiveness of its COVID jab
Apparently a company of liars
The state of Kansas yesterday filed a detailed suit against the pharmaceutical company Pfizer over the many lies and misrepresentations it pushed as it rolled out its COVID jab, such as hiding the actual documented “adverse events”, including many deaths, that occurred after people got jabbed.
You can read the complaint here [pdf]. It opens as follows;
Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine.
- Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public.
- Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public.
- Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19.
- To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine.
The lawsuit has lots of juicy factoids. For example, Pfizer kept its own database of adverse events after people took its jab, and lied about that data to the public.
As of February 28, 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 158,893 adverse events (from 42,086 case reports) from its COVID-19 vaccine. As of February 28, 2021, Pfizer’s database contained 1,223 fatalities after taking Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, although Pfizer did not make causality findings.
Pfizer was receiving so many adverse event reports that it had to hire 600 additional full-time staff and expected to hire more than 1,800 additional resources by June 2021. Pfizer had such a backlog of adverse events that it might take 90 days to code “non-serious cases.”
Yet, on April 1, 2021, the company issued a press release insisting it knew of “no serious safety concerns through up to six months following second dose.” It repeated this claim numerous times over the coming months.
Furthermore, the lawsuit notes that Pfizer’s dishonest actions in connection with its COVID jab violated earlier consent judgments from previous state lawsuits in 2008, 2012, and 2014, which demanded the company stop making false statements about the safety of its drugs.
The state is demanding $20,000 for each violation of the 2008, 2012, and 2014 consent agreements as well as $10,000 for each violation of Kansas’s consumer protection laws, all of which could add up to many millions of dollars in penalties.
The facts here reveal something fundamental however about this drug company: It is dishonest, untrustworthy, and considers itself above the law. Why would anyone trust any of the drugs it manufactures, ever?
The support of my readers through the years has given me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Four years ago, just before the 2020 election I wrote that Joe Biden's mental health was suspect. Only in the past two weeks has the mainstream media decided to recognize that basic fact.
Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Even today NASA and Congress refuses to recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation:
5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.
Apparently a company of liars
The state of Kansas yesterday filed a detailed suit against the pharmaceutical company Pfizer over the many lies and misrepresentations it pushed as it rolled out its COVID jab, such as hiding the actual documented “adverse events”, including many deaths, that occurred after people got jabbed.
You can read the complaint here [pdf]. It opens as follows;
Pfizer misled the public that it had a “safe and effective” COVID-19 vaccine.
- Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was safe even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine was connected to serious adverse events, including myocarditis and pericarditis, failed pregnancies, and deaths. Pfizer concealed this critical safety information from the public.
- Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine was effective even though it knew its COVID-19 vaccine waned over time and did not protect against COVID-19 variants. Pfizer concealed this critical effectiveness information from the public.
- Pfizer said its COVID-19 vaccine would prevent transmission of COVID-19 even though it knew it never studied the effect of its vaccine on transmission of COVID-19.
- To keep the public from learning the truth, Pfizer worked to censor speech on social media that questioned Pfizer’s claims about its COVID-19 vaccine.
The lawsuit has lots of juicy factoids. For example, Pfizer kept its own database of adverse events after people took its jab, and lied about that data to the public.
As of February 28, 2021, Pfizer’s adverse events database contained 158,893 adverse events (from 42,086 case reports) from its COVID-19 vaccine. As of February 28, 2021, Pfizer’s database contained 1,223 fatalities after taking Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, although Pfizer did not make causality findings.
Pfizer was receiving so many adverse event reports that it had to hire 600 additional full-time staff and expected to hire more than 1,800 additional resources by June 2021. Pfizer had such a backlog of adverse events that it might take 90 days to code “non-serious cases.”
Yet, on April 1, 2021, the company issued a press release insisting it knew of “no serious safety concerns through up to six months following second dose.” It repeated this claim numerous times over the coming months.
Furthermore, the lawsuit notes that Pfizer’s dishonest actions in connection with its COVID jab violated earlier consent judgments from previous state lawsuits in 2008, 2012, and 2014, which demanded the company stop making false statements about the safety of its drugs.
The state is demanding $20,000 for each violation of the 2008, 2012, and 2014 consent agreements as well as $10,000 for each violation of Kansas’s consumer protection laws, all of which could add up to many millions of dollars in penalties.
The facts here reveal something fundamental however about this drug company: It is dishonest, untrustworthy, and considers itself above the law. Why would anyone trust any of the drugs it manufactures, ever?
The support of my readers through the years has given me the freedom and ability to analyze objectively the ongoing renaissance in space, as well as the cultural changes -- for good or ill -- that are happening across America. Four years ago, just before the 2020 election I wrote that Joe Biden's mental health was suspect. Only in the past two weeks has the mainstream media decided to recognize that basic fact.
Fourteen years ago I wrote that SLS and Orion were a bad ideas, a waste of money, would be years behind schedule, and better replaced by commercial private enterprise. Even today NASA and Congress refuses to recognize this reality.
In 2020 when the world panicked over COVID I wrote that the panic was unnecessary, that the virus was apparently simply a variation of the flu, that masks were not simply pointless but if worn incorrectly were a health threat, that the lockdowns were a disaster and did nothing to stop the spread of COVID. Only in the past year have some of our so-called experts in the health field have begun to recognize these facts.
Your help allows me to do this kind of intelligent analysis. I take no advertising or sponsors, so my reporting isn't influenced by donations by established space or drug companies. Instead, I rely entirely on donations and subscriptions from my readers, which gives me the freedom to write what I think, unencumbered by outside influences.
Please consider supporting my work here at Behind the Black.
You can support me either by giving a one-time contribution or a regular subscription. There are five ways of doing so:
1. Zelle: This is the only internet method that charges no fees. All you have to do is use the Zelle link at your internet bank and give my name and email address (zimmerman at nasw dot org). What you donate is what I get.
2. Patreon: Go to my website there and pick one of five monthly subscription amounts, or by making a one-time donation.
3. A Paypal Donation:
5. Donate by check, payable to Robert Zimmerman and mailed to
Behind The Black
c/o Robert Zimmerman
P.O.Box 1262
Cortaro, AZ 85652
You can also support me by buying one of my books, as noted in the boxes interspersed throughout the webpage or shown in the menu above. And if you buy the books through the ebookit links, I get a larger cut and I get it sooner.
“The wheels of justice grind exceeding slow, but grind exceeding fine”
Now get that lying XCRR$#!! Fauxci !!
Definition of the term factoid that Robert used:
an assumption or speculation that is reported and repeated so often that it becomes accepted as fact.
Seems like an appropriate use of the word. Let’s see where this leads. Will the gang on this site accept the results if Kansas loses?
“Will the gang on this site accept the results if Kansas loses?”
I think it has been reasonably established by the evidence available at the minimum that the government in the form of Fauci and the drug companies have outright lied for reasons that fully remain to be established.
I suspect that the lying and misdirection was driven by monetary incentives and the push to establish the “NEW” mRNA technology.
And I will assume that all of the drug companies as well as Dr. Fauci will claim that they had to manipulate the truth because of the emergency nature of the Covid event and the government had agreed to them not having any responsibility related to their manipulations.
You know, the noble lie.
Discovery will be interesting to say the least and the 10 or more years that it will take to complete will find many of those who are curious about the result will not be alive to care?
Were you compelled to take the shot because you needed to feed your kids and pay your mortgage?
Many were.
Trust none of them.
Robert Zimmerman wrote: “The facts here reveal something fundamental however about this drug company: It is dishonest, untrustworthy, and considers itself above the law. Why would anyone trust any of the drugs it manufactures, ever?”
There are a few philosophies that a company can operate under. One of them is to do what it takes to be honest and remain moral, ethical, and within the law. Another is to consider various fines to be part of the cost of doing business. We all should consider which type of company we would rather do business with.
__________________
Jed Clampett wrote: “Will the gang on this site accept the results if Kansas loses?”
It is so nice that Jed is judgmental in a preconceived way. Isn’t there a word for that?
1,223 corpses, that’s one hell of a data point. Some would have died naturally, few in the pandemic, but that’s a big pile of bodies from a study. Sounds kinda relevant to me, the fact that they didn’t report on it tells you all you need to know. The data point is that they are evil.
Never Forget, Never Forgive.
I thought Republicans joined Democrats in protecting firms from lawsuits.
That must have been individual victims.
Us poor aren’t supposed to have anything
The previous largest ever fine against a Pharma company was Pfizer, in the tune of billions for far less than the Covid-19 jab. The entire board of directors should see the inside of a dank prison cell for a very long time. Profit over safety.
It will comes down to words.
“If you experience severe side effects after getting a Covid vaccine, lawyers tell CNBC there is basically no one to blame in a U.S. court of law.
The federal government has granted companies like Pfizer
and Moderna immunity from liability if something unintentionally goes wrong with their vaccines.
“It is very rare for a blanket immunity law to be passed,” said Rogge Dunn, a Dallas labor and employment attorney. “Pharmaceutical companies typically aren’t offered much liability protection under the law.“
You also can’t sue the Food and Drug Administration for authorizing a vaccine for emergency use, nor can you hold your employer accountable if they mandate inoculation as a condition of employment.”
And this is the word: unintentionally
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/12/16/covid-vaccine-side-effects-compensation-lawsuit.html
If under a declared national emergency by the government a drug is introduced to deal with it and you or a family member dies or is severely injured from that drug under these declared circumstances the drug companies may well be held NOT liable.
There is however always those fine details where people, like Dr. Fauci and others within and without government have alternate motivations and seek to either conduct mass biological experiments on the entire human race on planet earth and establish that “NEW” technology that remains unproven in so many applications.
Monetary, ideological, political and religion all may play a part in this drama.
And the purpose of the lawsuit is first the discovery and attempting to shine the light of truth into the darkest crevasses of perversion, greed and corruption that we understand is ever present in the hearts of some.
So, is the Kansas court case the be all and end all regarding Covid and the forced mRNA shot as Jed Clampet proposes?
In a word, NO!
And the fact that he proposes that it is tells me a lot about the limitations of his personal thought process and who and what exactly he is aligned with.
And here is the tip of the Fauci mea culpa I will not be going to prison for my noble lie’s iceberg:
https://nypost.com/2024/06/18/us-news/dr-anthony-fauci-finally-reverses-course-agrees-keeping-schools-closed-during-covid-was-mistake/
Jed, you should have stayed on the farm, that oil and your newfound wealth and elite attitude has displaced your good old country common sense.
And it begins, here the Kansas attorney general fleshes out the basis of their lawsuit:
Dr. John Campbell: https://youtu.be/ejVSTRjVkSs?si=9X69obboQSYkKPQp
“A part of a multi-state effort”.
And lets remember, Dr. Campbell was well on board with the government and drug company’s directions regarding Covid and the mRNA “vaccine”. He was on board until the moment that he realized he was being lied to, being a well experienced medically trained professional. And now he is their worst nightmare.
And that is how it should be.
It is my understanding, and I could be wrong, is that the COVID19 “jab” doesn’t meet the definition of a “vaccine”, since it doesn’t stop anyone from contracting or transmitting the disease, and instead should be considered by definition a “therapeutic”. If this is done in a court of law then don’t all those protections for the drug companies and people involved go away?
And this is the function of Congress, shining the light of some measure of truth into the dark crevasses of corruption and greed.
I the Covid shot a military bioweapon? https://youtu.be/8PLxWrDL4LE?si=2g_LCn5o2FQ0gu9S
Thomas Wilson, stay tuned, keeping in mind NO ONE in government or the corporate world rarely is ever pays the consequences for their perversion and corruptions.
I call it when all is said and done TREASON!
I hope we are not all;; wasting our time and a load of dosh as well but I saw something today which has,as yet, not been confirmed and
that is that Amnesty International want to call bygones bygones to the covid 19 affair.Of course you are not happy but people like Rand Paul have always been chasing moonbeams and always will.His dad was also unlucky to come up against the force,I know you will all say
“no way” but nobody is getting anywhere until Trump takes over and it may prevent other pandemics and shots of the mandatory type
Look up the structure of cell membranes, i.e. all animal cells. The “BIG breakthrough” on the mRNA vaccine was getting the mRNA actually into the interior of the cell where the ribosomes can use the mRNA to transcribe it to the spike protein in turn stimulating the immune system. The breakthrough was the encapsulating lipid nanovesicles transporting the mRNA for endocytosis (crossing the cell membrane). Whereby when “inoculated” every organ in the body is susceptible to incorporation of the spike protein mRNA. Think about that injected into your body.
For me, an aborted biophysicist, it was a no-brainer from the start.
To Edward et alia
In 1923 Robert Wood Johnson wrote the following for J&J – I have talked to persons in the past that worked for J&J and asked about the Credo (having read about it in Jim Collins Good to Great and/or Built to Last). They were emphatic at the time that this credo is driven into the employees. Collins points to the Tylenol scare where they cleared the shelves nationwide when a much more contained recall would have done. This smaller recall was seen in the later Excedrin scare where the company deeply curtailed the recall.
I wonder if J&J Credo belief is still the case.
Dr. John Campbell on experimentation funded by Bill Gates:
https://youtu.be/j9rqfyuJ3gk?si=GAl9YiyMhqbdSsX9
Bill Gates in the manner in which he chooses to spend his billions will find that virus that will fulfill his prognostications and goals of culling the human herd?
Nerds and politicians, trust none of them.
Chris,
This lawsuit is against Pfizer, for lying. I do not know whether any of the other companies lied to us or were merely supplying something that was in demand. The government, some employers, and some sellers/venues/destinations demanded that we get shot before entering their premises. The paperwork was called a “Vax passport.”
Johnson & Johnson is still proud of their credo:
https://www.jnj.com/our-credo
Just listen to just 5 or 6 minutes of this poor bastard who is a victim of the Fauci / Pfizer mass human bio experiment without consent.
https://youtu.be/3vwKcF-O-v4?si=g2vdVNw4wYG16lai
Ah, the noble lie.
And the United States government forced experimentation on human beings at the potential cost of our military readiness and ability to project force where and when necessary continues:
https://dailycaller.com/2024/06/20/veterans-pentagon-proposal-lab-grown-meat/
When will the “T” word be used in relation to this administration and the Democrat party machine agenda be used as it should?
No, that could never happen!
I point out the recent U.S. / Dr. Fauci covid / mRNA new technology / proof of concept experience and this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuskegee_Syphilis_Study