<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NASA awards SpaceX deal to provide cargo to Gateway	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-awards-spacex-deal-to-provide-cargo-to-gateway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-awards-spacex-deal-to-provide-cargo-to-gateway/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 00:47:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: sippin_bourbon		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-awards-spacex-deal-to-provide-cargo-to-gateway/#comment-1078221</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sippin_bourbon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 00:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=64570#comment-1078221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dragon XL...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dragon XL&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: sippin_bourbon		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-awards-spacex-deal-to-provide-cargo-to-gateway/#comment-1078205</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sippin_bourbon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 16:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=64570#comment-1078205</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am not finding much info regarding the DragonVL mentioned in the articles, so I am assuming this is still theoretical. Usually Musk likes to throw something out, even if the numbers are huge or outlandish, and then pared down to reality later.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not finding much info regarding the DragonVL mentioned in the articles, so I am assuming this is still theoretical. Usually Musk likes to throw something out, even if the numbers are huge or outlandish, and then pared down to reality later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard M		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-awards-spacex-deal-to-provide-cargo-to-gateway/#comment-1078202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2020 12:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=64570#comment-1078202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[mkent,

It sure is striking how rapidly Boeing&#039;s enthusiasm for the Gateway has receded as it became evident they weren&#039;t getting any contracts to build it, or for SLS to launch it. 

So an architecture where Boeing gets billions more to develop an expensive upper stage for SLS (which of course will take much longer and cost much more money than anticipated) is just the ticket for them, regardless of whether they get a lander contract or not. Unfortunately, it looks like they have a fair shot at getting what they want.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mkent,</p>
<p>It sure is striking how rapidly Boeing&#8217;s enthusiasm for the Gateway has receded as it became evident they weren&#8217;t getting any contracts to build it, or for SLS to launch it. </p>
<p>So an architecture where Boeing gets billions more to develop an expensive upper stage for SLS (which of course will take much longer and cost much more money than anticipated) is just the ticket for them, regardless of whether they get a lander contract or not. Unfortunately, it looks like they have a fair shot at getting what they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lee S		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-awards-spacex-deal-to-provide-cargo-to-gateway/#comment-1078161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 13:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=64570#comment-1078161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[From a European perspective, whatever way around it is/was... This is a win for the you guys... Capitalism at its best.... And to be fair... NASA is head and shoulders above anyone else at robotic missions... But when it comes to launches, SpaceX kicks NASAs butt.  As You have pointed out so many times Bob, it seems that the SLS is more of a jobs program than a serious attempt to throw stuff into space. I&#039;m pleased that sanity seems to be falling into place, and the logical plan is being considered. I know we don&#039;t see eye to eye on many subjects... But on this space related one, ( which is why I am here )..   go USA!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From a European perspective, whatever way around it is/was&#8230; This is a win for the you guys&#8230; Capitalism at its best&#8230;. And to be fair&#8230; NASA is head and shoulders above anyone else at robotic missions&#8230; But when it comes to launches, SpaceX kicks NASAs butt.  As You have pointed out so many times Bob, it seems that the SLS is more of a jobs program than a serious attempt to throw stuff into space. I&#8217;m pleased that sanity seems to be falling into place, and the logical plan is being considered. I know we don&#8217;t see eye to eye on many subjects&#8230; But on this space related one, ( which is why I am here )..   go USA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mkent		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-awards-spacex-deal-to-provide-cargo-to-gateway/#comment-1078152</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mkent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 07:19:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=64570#comment-1078152</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, and Boeing has been massively lobbying
*against* Gateway for quite some time now.
Their preference is an expendable architecture
using two SLS flights and no commercial flights
per Artemis mission.  They are opposed to the
Gateway-centered re-usable architecture planned
for Artemis.  It seems in this case you have
things exactly backwards.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Boeing has been massively lobbying<br />
*against* Gateway for quite some time now.<br />
Their preference is an expendable architecture<br />
using two SLS flights and no commercial flights<br />
per Artemis mission.  They are opposed to the<br />
Gateway-centered re-usable architecture planned<br />
for Artemis.  It seems in this case you have<br />
things exactly backwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mkent		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-awards-spacex-deal-to-provide-cargo-to-gateway/#comment-1078151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mkent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 07:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=64570#comment-1078151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What are you talking about Robert?  SLS did not
have a monopoly of Gateway flights.  In fact,
SLS had no Gateway flights at all.  Both previous
Gateway contracts -- the Power and Propulsion
Element and the MiniHab (the only Gateway
elements needed for the 2024 flight under the
original plan) -- provided for commercial launches
for their elements.  Boeing won neither of htose.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you talking about Robert?  SLS did not<br />
have a monopoly of Gateway flights.  In fact,<br />
SLS had no Gateway flights at all.  Both previous<br />
Gateway contracts &#8212; the Power and Propulsion<br />
Element and the MiniHab (the only Gateway<br />
elements needed for the 2024 flight under the<br />
original plan) &#8212; provided for commercial launches<br />
for their elements.  Boeing won neither of htose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Lopes		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-awards-spacex-deal-to-provide-cargo-to-gateway/#comment-1078140</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Lopes]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 00:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=64570#comment-1078140</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s an admission that SLS may not be the vehicle we will use to explore (and settle) the rest of the solar system. At the very least, NASA is keeping its options open. SLS is a failure and they know it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s an admission that SLS may not be the vehicle we will use to explore (and settle) the rest of the solar system. At the very least, NASA is keeping its options open. SLS is a failure and they know it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pzatchok		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-awards-spacex-deal-to-provide-cargo-to-gateway/#comment-1078138</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pzatchok]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2020 23:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://behindtheblack.com/?p=64570#comment-1078138</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Could the killing of SLS be the cost to get a Covid 19 loan from the government to save Boeing?
Drop the SlS to save the Max?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could the killing of SLS be the cost to get a Covid 19 loan from the government to save Boeing?<br />
Drop the SlS to save the Max?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
