<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NASA has identified ninety percent of the largest near-Earth asteroids	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-has-identified-ninety-percent-of-the-largest-near-earth-asteroids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-has-identified-ninety-percent-of-the-largest-near-earth-asteroids/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:14:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: David Hollick		</title>
		<link>https://behindtheblack.com/behind-the-black/points-of-information/nasa-has-identified-ninety-percent-of-the-largest-near-earth-asteroids/#comment-28596</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Hollick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behindtheblack.com/?p=12254#comment-28596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[How can they possibly say that they&#039;ve found 90% of the near Earth asteroids, when there are still undiscovered ones?  Isn&#039;t this a complete guess?  It reminds me of the old stupid question &quot; How many undiscovered caves are there?&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can they possibly say that they&#8217;ve found 90% of the near Earth asteroids, when there are still undiscovered ones?  Isn&#8217;t this a complete guess?  It reminds me of the old stupid question &#8221; How many undiscovered caves are there?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
